Bell, J. M.
(1995). Avoiding isomorphism: Acall for a different view. Journal of Family Nursing, 1, 5-7.
2.
Berardo, F. M.
(1990). Trends and directions in family research in the 1980's. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 809-817.
3.
Feetham, S. L.
(1984). Family research: Issues and directions for nursing. In H. H. Werley & J. J. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research (pp. 3-25). New York: Springer.
4.
Gilliss, C. L.
(1989). Family research in nursing. In C. L. Gilliss, B. L. Highley, B. M. Roberts, & I. M. Martinson (Eds.), Toward a science offamily nursing (pp. 37-63). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Hayes, V. E.
(1993). Nursing science in family care, 1984-1990. In S. L. Feetham, S. B. Meister, J. M. Bell, & C. L. Gilliss (Eds.), The nursing of families: Theory/research/education/practice. (pp. 18-29). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Litman, T. J.
(1989). Some methodological problems and issues in family health research. In C. V. Ramsey (Ed.), Family systems medicine (pp. 167-180). New York: Guilford.
7.
Moriarty, H. J.
(1990). Key issues in the family research process: Strategies for nurse researchers. Advances in Nursing Science, 12(3), 1-14.
8.
Nye, F. I.
(1988). Fifty years of family research, 1937-1987. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 305-316.
9.
Sprey, J.
(1988). Current theorizing on the family: An appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 875-890.
10.
Thomas, R. B.
(1987). Methodological issues and problems in family health care research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 65-70.
11.
Uphold, C. L.
, & Strickland, O. L. (1989). Issues related to the unit of analysis in family nursing research. Western Journal ofNursing Research, 11, 405-417.
12.
Whall, A. L.
, & Loveland-Cherry, C. J. (1993). Family unit-focused research: 1984-1991. In J. J. Fitzpatrick, R. L Taunton, & A. S. Jacox (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research (pp. 227-247). New York: Springer.
