Youth prefer to be involved in treatment decisions, yet youth participation is minimally present in decisions like stem cell transplant (SCT) that require frequent medications and social isolation to be successful in curing cancer and chronic illness. The purpose of our study is to identify the barriers and facilitators to youth decision-making involvement in the youth–parent interaction when referred for treatment with SCT. We report qualitative findings from our theory-driven mixed-methods study. We thematically analyzed our field notes of youth and parent observations and audio-recordings during SCT consultations and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected from 10 youth, 8 to 16 (median 12) years of age, and their parents (n = 20). Three themes emerged: (a) Reluctant unless motivated, (b) Uncertain but capable, and (c) Limited unless supported. Our findings emphasize the critical role parents may take in facilitating youth involvement in decisions.
AdamsR. C.LevyS. E., & Council on Children with Disabilities. (2017). Shared decision-making and children with disabilities: Pathways to consensus. Pediatrics, 139(6), Article e20170956. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0956
2.
AtkinsL.FrancisJ.IslamR.O’ConnorD.PateyA.IversN.FoyR.DuncanE. M.ColquhounH.GrimshawJ. M.LawtonR.MichieS. (2017). A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of Behavioral Change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science, 12(77), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9
CaneJ.O’ConnorD.MichieS. (2012). Validation of the theoretic domains framework for use in behavior change and implementation research. Implementation Science, 7(37), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
5.
ColorafiK. J.EvansB. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171
6.
CoyneI.AmoryA.GibsonF.KiernanG. (2016). Information-sharing between healthcare professionals, parents and children with cancer: More than a matter of information exchange. European Journal of Cancer Care, 25(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12411
7.
D’SouzaA.FrethamC.LeeS. J.AroraM.BrunnerJ.ChhabraS.DevineS.EapenM.HamadaniM.HariP.PasquiniM. C.PerezW.PhelanR. A.RichesM. L.RizzoJ. D.SaberW.ShawB. E.SpellmanS. R.SteinertP.. . .HorowitzM. M. (2021). Current use and trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 26(8), e177–e182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.04.013
8.
HokkanenH.ErikssonE.AhonenO.SalanteraS. (2004). Adolescents with cancer: Experience of life and how it could be made easier. Cancer Nursing, 27(4), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200407000-00010
9.
JedelooS.van StaaA.LatourJ. M.van ExelN. J. A. (2010). Preferences for health care and self-management among Dutch adolescents with chronic conditions: A Q-methodological investigation. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(5), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.006
10.
KellyK. P.MowbrayC.Pyke-GrimmK.HindsP. S. (2017). Identifying a conceptual shift in a child and adolescent-reported treatment decision making: “Having a say, as I need at this time.”Pediatric Blood and Cancer, 64(4), Article e26262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26262
11.
KeysE. M.NorrisJ. M.CameronE. E.BrightK. S.Tomfohr-MadsenL. M.BenziesK. M. (2019). Recruitment and retention of fathers with young children in early childhood health intervention research: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), Article 300. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1215-1
12.
KnopfJ. M.HornungR. W.SlapG. B.DeVellisR. F.BrittoM. T. (2008). Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illness and their parents: A pilot study. Health Expectations, 11(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00508.x
13.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
14.
MantJ.KirbyA.CoxK. J.BurkeA. (2019). Children’s experiences of being diagnosed with cancer at the early stages of treatment: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104518788400
15.
MillerV. A. (2018). Involving youth with a chronic illness in decision-making: Highlighting the role of providers. Pediatrics, 142(s3), S142–S148. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-0516D
16.
MillerV. A.FeudtnerC.JawadA. F. (2017). Children’s decision-making involvement about research participation: Associations with perceived fairness and self-efficacy. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617696921
MorseJ. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
19.
Pyke-GrimmK. A.SchulzG. L.PearsonH.KellyK. P. (2020). Treatment decision making. In HindsP. S.LinderL. (Eds.), Pediatric oncology nursing-defining care through science (pp. 169–190). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25804-7_10
SchulzG. L.Patterson KellyK. P.HoltmannM.ArmerJ. M. (2021). Navigating decisional conflict as a family when facing the decision of stem cell transplant for a child or adolescent with sickle cell disease. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(5), 1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.011
22.
SmithL. E.MaybachA. M.FeldmanA.DarlingA.AkardT. F.GilmerM. J. (2019). Parent and child preferences and styles of communication about cancer diagnoses and treatment. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 36(6), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454219859235
StaceyD.LegareF.LewisK.BarryM. J.BennettC. L.EdenK. B.Holmes-RovnerM.Llewellyn-ThomasH.LyddiattA.ThomsonR.TrevenaL., & Cochrane Consumers Communication Group. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4), Article CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5
25.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
26.
van StaaA., & On Your Own Feet Research Group. (2011). Unraveling triadic communication in hospital consultations with adolescents with chronic conditions: The added value of mixed methods research. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(3), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.001
27.
YoungB.Dixon-WoodsM.WindridgeK. C.HeneyD. (2003). Managing communication with young people who have a potentially live threatening chronic illness: Qualitative study of patients and parents. BMJ, 326(7384), Article 305. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.305
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
