Family-centered intervention can help families facing illness-related issues. We investigated the feasibility of Family and Network Conversations (FNCs) in high-grade glioma patients and their families. Quasi-experimental feasibility study with longitudinal mixed-methods design. Patients and families were invited to three FNCs over 1 year. They completed questionnaires at four time points and expressed their perspectives on the intervention through telephone interviews. Nurses’ perspectives were collected in a focus group. Twenty-one patients and 47 family members were included. On average, patients were 66 years old, mainly male, married, living with caregivers, with unifocal cancer. On average, caregivers were 47 years old, mainly female, being spouses or children of the patient. Quantitative and qualitative data did not always match and expanded each other. Nurse-delivered FNCs holistically addressed families’ needs while strengthening family’s dialogue and union. Nurses felt empowered, underling that advanced competencies were required. Nurse-delivered FNCs are feasible to provide family-centered care, but they should be tailored to each family’s needs.
ArmstrongT. S.DirvenL.AronsD.BatesA.ChangS. M.CoensC.EspinasseC.GilbertM. R.JenkinsonD.KluetzP.MendozaT.RubinsteinL.SulJ.WellerM.WenP. Y.van den BentM. J.TaphoornM. J. B. (2020). Glioma patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical care and research: A response assessment in neuro-oncology collaborative report. Lancet Oncology, 21(2), e97–e103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30796-X
2.
ArmstrongT. S.MendozaT.GningI.CocoC.CohenM. Z.EriksenL.HsuM. A.GilbertM. R.CleelandC. (2006). Validation of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT). Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 80(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-006-9135-z
3.
BanaM.RibiK.PetersS.Kropf-StaubS.NäfE.Zürcher-FlorinS.StoffelB.BlaeuerC.BornerM.MalinD.BiberR.BetticherD.Kuhn-BächlerT.CantoniN.SeegerT.BütikoferL.EicherM. (2021). Pilot testing of a nurse-led basic symptom self-management support for patients receiving first-line systemic outpatient anticancer treatment: A cluster-randomized study (Symptom Navi Pilot Study). Cancer Nursing, 44(6), E687–E702. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000995
4.
BenzeinE. G.HagbergM.SavemanB. I. (2008). “Being appropriately unusual”: A challenge for nurses in health-promoting conversations with families. Nursing Inquiry, 15(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2008.00401.x
5.
BenzeinE. G.OlinC.PerssonC. (2015). “You put it all together”: Families’ evaluation of participating in family health conversations. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 29(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12141
6.
BerthelsenC. B.Hølge-HazeltonB. (2017). Nursing research culture’ in the context of clinical nursing practice: Addressing a conceptual problem. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(5), 1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13229
7.
BoeleF. W.GivenC. W.GivenB. A.DonovanH. S.SchulzR.WeimerJ. M.DrappatzJ.LiebermanF. S.SherwoodP. R. (2017). Family caregivers’ level of mastery predicts survival of patients with glioblastoma: A preliminary report. Cancer, 123(5), 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30428
8.
BoeleF. W.TerhorstL.PrinceJ.DonovanH. S.WeimerJ.SherwoodP. R.LiebermanF. S.DrappatzJ. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the caregiver needs screen in neuro-oncology family caregivers. Journal of Nursing Measures, 27(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.27.2.162
9.
BoeleF. W.van Uden-KraanC. F.HilverdaK.WeimerJ.DonovanH. S.DrappatzJ.LiebermanF. S.Verdonck-de LeeuwI.SherwoodP. R. (2017). Neuro-oncology family caregivers’ view on keeping track of care issues using eHealth systems: It’s a question of time. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 134(1), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2504-y
10.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
11.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
12.
BroekemaS. P. W.RoodbolP. F.LuttikM. L. A. (2021). Effects of family nursing conversations on families in home health care: A controlled before-and-after study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(1), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14599
13.
BustamanteC. (2017). TPACK and Teachers of Spanish: Development of a theory-based joint display in a mixed methods research case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817712119
14.
CallesenP. (2020). Live more think less—overcoming depression and sadness with metacognitive therapy. Icon Books.
15.
ChristensenA. V.DixonJ. K.JuelK.EkholmO.RasmussenT. B.BorregaardB.MolsR. E.ThrysøeL.ThorupC. B.BergS. K. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Danish Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with cardiac disease: Results from the DenHeart survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1264-0
16.
CoomansM. B.DirvenL.AaronsonN. K.BaumertB. G.Van Den BentM.BottomleyA.BrandesA. A.ChinotO.CoensC.GorliaT.HerrlingerU.Keime-GuibertF.MalmstromA.MartinelliF.StuppR.TalacchiA.WellerM.WickW.ReijneveldJ. C.TaphoornM. J. B. (2019). Symptom clusters in newly diagnosed glioma patients: Which symptom clusters are independently associated with functioning and global health status?Neuro-Oncology, 21(11), 1447–1457. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz118
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (Vol. 1). Sage.
18.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkL. V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
19.
CubisL.OwnsworthT.PinkhamM. B.ChambersS. (2018). The social trajectory of brain tumor: A qualitative metasynthesis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(16), 1857–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1315183
20.
CubisL.OwnsworthT.PinkhamM. B.FooteM.LeggM.ChambersS. (2019). The importance of staying connected: Mediating and moderating effects of social group memberships on psychological well-being after brain tumor. Psychooncology, 28(7), 1537–1543. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5125
21.
CurranJ.ParryG. D.HardyG. E.DarlingJ.MasonA. M.ChambersE. (2019). How does therapy harm? A model of adverse process using task analysis in the meta-synthesis of service users’ experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00347
22.
Declaration of Helsinki. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
23.
DewingJ.McCormackB.McCanceT. (2021). Person-centred nursing research: Methodology, methods and outcomes. Springer.
24.
DirvenL.ArmstrongT. S.BlakeleyJ. O.BrownP. D.GrantR.JalaliR.LeeperH.MendozaT.NayakL.ReijneveldJ. C.Le RhunE.WalbertT.WellerM.WenP. Y.TaphoornM. J. B. (2018). Working plan for the use of patient-reported outcome measures in adults with brain tumours: A Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) initiative. Lancet Oncology, 19(3), e173–e180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30004-4
25.
DoserK.NorupA. (2016). Caregiver burden in Danish family members of patients with severe brain injury: The chronic phase. Brain Injury, 30(3), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2015.1114143
26.
ElmståhlS.MalmbergB.AnnerstedtL. (1996). Caregiver’s burden of patients 3 years after stroke assessed by a novel caregiver burden scale. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 77(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90164-1
27.
ErikssonI.LindbladM.MöllerU.GillsjöC. (2018). Holistic health care: Patients’ experiences of health care provided by an advanced practice nurse. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 24(1), Article e12603. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12603
28.
FaarupI.LauridsenJ. T.LütgenK.NørregaardA.PoulsenF. R.ØstergaardB. (2019). Do family health conversations impact patients with glioblastoma multiforme and their family members?Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(9–10), 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14777
29.
FarrellC.WalsheC.MolassiotisA. (2017). Are nurse-led chemotherapy clinics really nurse-led? An ethnographic study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 69, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.005
30.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6Pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
31.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
32.
HeinschM.CootesH.WellsH.TicknerC.WilsonJ.SultaniG.Kay-LambkinF. (2022). Supporting friends and family of adults with a primary brain tumour: A systematic review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(3), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13586
JanssonM. R. N.von Heymann-HoranA.RasmussenB. K.AlbieriV.FrederiksenK.SuppliN.DaltonS. O.JohansenC.BidstrupP. E. (2018). Risk for use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics in partners of glioma patients: A nationwide study covering 19 years of prescriptions. Psychooncology, 27(8), 1930–1936. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4744
35.
KargoA. S.JensenP. T.LindemannK.HjollundN. H. I.LundB.HaeeM.MöllerS.HansenD. G.Dahl SteffensenK. (2021). The PROMova study comparing active and passive use of patient-reported outcome measures in ovarian cancer follow-up: Effect on patient-perceived involvement, satisfaction with care, and usefulness. Acta Oncologica, 60(4), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1891281
36.
KishinoM.Ellis-SmithC.AfolabiO.KoffmanJ. (2022). Family involvement in advance care planning for people living with advanced cancer: A systematic mixed-methods review. Palliative Medicine, 36(3), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211068282
37.
KonradsenH.DieperinkK. B.LauridsenJ.SorknaesA. D.OstergaardB. (2018). Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the Ice Expressive Family Functioning and Ice Family Perceived Support questionnaires. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 32(4), 1447–1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12591
38.
KruegerR.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage.
39.
LawlerM.OliverK.GijsselsS.AaproM.AbolinaA.AlbrehtT.ErdemS.GeisslerJ.JassemJ.KarjalainenS.La VecchiaC.LievensY.MeunierF.MorrisseyM.NarediP.OberstS.PoortmansP.PriceR.SullivanR.. . . SelbyP. (2021). The European Code of Cancer Practice. Journal of Cancer Policy, 28, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100282
40.
LewisM.BromleyK.SuttonC. J.McCrayG.MyersH. L.LancasterG. A. (2021). Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: The hypothesis test strikes back!Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 7(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x
41.
LocatelliG.AusiliD.StubbingsV.Di MauroS.LucianiM. (2021). The epilepsy specialist nurse: A mixed-methods case study on the role and activities. Seizure, 85, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.12.013
42.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
43.
MarraJ. S.MendesG. P.YoshinariG. H.da Silva GuimarãesF.MazinS. C.de OliveiraH. F. (2019). Survival after radiation therapy for high-grade glioma. Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy, 24(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2018.09.003
44.
MatthiessenJ.Biltoft-JensenA.RasmussenL. B.HelsO.FagtS.GrothM. V. (2008). Comparison of the Danish Physical Activity Questionnaire with a validated position and motion instrument. European Journal of Epidemiol, 23(5), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-008-9228-4
45.
McCaffreyR.ReinosoH. (2017). Transformational leadership: A model for advanced practice holistic nurses. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 35(4), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010116685242
46.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2004). Mixed method and mixed model research. In JohnsonR. B.ChristensenL. B. (Eds.), Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (pp. 408–431). Allyn & Bacon.
47.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of “significant” findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770–792.
48.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636
49.
OrsmondG. I.CohnE. S. (2015). The distinctive features of a feasibility study: Objectives and guiding questions. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(3), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449215578649
50.
PaceA.KoekkoekJ. A. F.Van Den BentM. J.BulbeckH. J.FlemingJ.GrantR.GollaH.HenrikssonR.KerriganS.MarosiC.ObergI.OberndorferS.OliverK.PasmanH. R. W.Le RhunE.RooneyA. G.RudaR.VeroneseS.WalbertT.. . . DirvenL. (2020). Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: Why and how?Neuro-Oncology Practice, 7(6), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa040
51.
ParkM.LeeM.JeongH.JeongM.GoY. (2018). Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: A review of systematic reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 87, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.006
52.
PiilK.JakobsenJ.ChristensenK. B.JuhlerM.GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.JardenM. (2018). Needs and preferences among patients with high-grade glioma and their caregivers: A longitudinal mixed methods study. European Journal of Cancer Care, 27(2), Article e12806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12806
53.
PiilK.JakobsenJ.ChristensenK. B.JuhlerM.JardenM. (2015). Health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade gliomas: A quantitative longitudinal study. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 124(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1821-2
PiilK.JardenM. (2018). Bereaved caregivers to patients with high-grade glioma: A qualitative explorative study. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 50(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000348
56.
PiilK.KolbaekR.OttmannG.RasmussenB. (2012). The impact of the expanded nursing practice on professional identify in Denmark. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 26(6), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e31826e3f43
57.
PiilK.Laegaard SkovhusS.TolverA.JardenM. (2022). Neuro-oncological symptoms: A longitudinal quantitative study of family function, perceived support, and caregiver burden. Journal of Family Nursing, 28(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407211029986
58.
PiilK.WhisenantM.MendozaT.ArmstrongT.CleelandC.NordentoftS.WilliamsL. A.JardenM. (2021). Psychometric validity and reliability of the Danish version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module. Neuro-Oncology Practice, 8(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa068
59.
REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (2016). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2016:119:FULL&from=EN
60.
RønneP. F.EsbensenB. A.BrødsgaardA.RosenstrømS. M.VoltelenB.HansenC. A. (2023). Barriers and facilitators influencing nurses’ confidence in managing family nursing conversations in the treatment of chronic noncancer pain: A longitudinal qualitative study. Journal of Family Nursing, 29(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407221145963
61.
SaltinB.GrimbyG. (1968). Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation, 38(6), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.38.6.1104
62.
SchubartJ. R.KinzieM. B.FaraceE. (2008). Caring for the brain tumor patient: Family caregiver burden and unmet needs. Neuro-Oncology, 10(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2007-040
63.
SeowH.GuthrieD. M.StevensT.BarberaL. C.BurgeF.McGrailK.ChanK. K. W.PeacockS. J.SutradharR. (2021). Trajectory of end-of-life pain and other physical symptoms among cancer patients receiving home care. Current Oncology, 28(3), 1641–1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28030153
64.
ShajaniZ.SnellD. (2019). Wright & Leahey’s nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (7th ed.). F. A. Davis.
Sorensen von EssenH.PiilK.Dahl SteffensenK.Rom PoulsenF. (2020). Shared decision making in high-grade glioma patients-a systematic review. Neuro-Oncology Practice, 7(6), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa042
67.
StichlerJ. F. (2015). Using consultants in the design, construction, and occupancy of new healthcare facilities. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(11), 537–539. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000259
68.
StuppR.HegiM. E.MasonW. P.van den BentM. J.TaphoornM. J.JanzerR. C.LudwinS. K.AllgeierA.FisherB.BelangerK.HauP.BrandesA. A.GijtenbeekJ.MarosiC.VechtC. J.MokhtariK.WesselingP.VillaSEisenhauerE. . . . National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials, G. (2009). Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. The Lancet Oncology, 10(5), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7
69.
SveinbjarnardottirE. K.SvavarsdottirE. K.HrafnkelssonB. (2012a). Psychometric development of the Iceland-Expressive Family Functioning Questionnaire (ICE-EFFQ). Journal of Family Nursing, 18(3), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840712449204
70.
SveinbjarnardottirE. K.SvavarsdottirE. K.HrafnkelssonB. (2012b). Psychometric development of the Iceland-Family Perceived Support Questionnaire (ICE-FPSQ). Journal of Family Nursing, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840712449203
71.
TeisbergE.WallaceS.O’HaraS. (2020). Defining and implementing value-based health care: A strategic framework. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003122
72.
WeitznerM. A.MeyersC. A.GelkeC. K.ByrneK. S.LevinV. A.CellaD. F. (1995). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale. Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer, 75(5), 1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950301)75:5<1151::AID-CNCR2820750515>3.0.CO;2-Q
73.
Wright & Leahey. (2013). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (6th ed.). F.A. Davis.
74.
ZimanskyM.StasielowiczL.FrankeI.RemmersH.FriedelH.AtzpodienJ. (2020). Effects of implementing a brief family nursing intervention with hospitalized oncology patients and their families in Germany: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Family Nursing, 26(4), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840720967022
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
