Though recent progress in family nursing science can serve the family nurse practitioner (FNP) to intervene in the regulation of family health, whether those advances are taught to FNP students has been unclear. All 266 FNP programs in the United States were invited to participate in a survey to assess the content and clinical application of family nursing theories in the curriculum. The majority of FNP programs frame family as the context of care for the individual. Though FNP students receive a foundation in family nursing theory in core courses, they are not usually expected to use family assessment methods in clinical practicum courses or to plan interventions for the family as the unit of care. The authors challenge educators to consider family nursing science as an essential component of the FNP program as the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) evolves and becomes requisite for entry into advanced practice.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Task Force on the Professional Clinical Doctorate. (2004). Position statement on the practice doctorate in nursing. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/pdf/DNP.pdf
6.
BarnardK. (1978a). Nursing Child Assessment-Feeding scale. Seattle: University of Washington.
7.
BarnardK. (1978b). Nursing Child Assessment Teaching scale. Seattle: University of Washington.
8.
BellJ. M. (2000). Reflections on the 5th International Family Nursing Conference, Chicago. Journal of Family Nursing, 6, 317-319. doi:10.1177/10748407000060040110.1177/107484070000600401
9.
BellJ. M. (2008). The Family Nursing Unit, University of Calgary: Reflections on 25 years of clinical scholarship (1982-2007) and closure announcement [Editorial]. Journal of Family Nursing, 14, 275-288. doi:10.1177/107484070832359810.1177/1074840708323598
BerlinL. E.HarperDWernerK. E.StennettJ. (2002). Master’s-level nurse practitioner educational programs: Findings from the 2000-2001 Collaborative Curriculum Survey. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing, and the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED481680.pdf
12.
BlasdellA.KlunickV.PursegloveT. (2002). The use of nursing and medical models in advanced practice: Does education affect the nurse practitioner’s practice model?Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 231-233. PMID:12025868
13.
BomarP. J.McNeelyG. (1996). Nurses and family health promotion: Concepts, assessment, and interventions (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
14.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
BurmanM.HartA.ConleyV.BrownJ.SherardP.ClarkeP. (2009). Reconceptualizing the core of nurse practitioner education and practice. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 21(1), 11-17. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00365.x10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00365.x
16.
BurmanM.StepansM.JansaN.SteinerS. (2002). How do NPs make clinical decisions?Nurse Practitioner, 27(5), 57-64. doi:10.1097/00006205-200205000-0001010.1097/00006205-200205000-00010
17.
CarterE. A.McGoldrickM. (1999). The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family and social perspectives (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
CheslaC. (2010). Do family interventions improve health?Journal of Family Nursing, 16, 355-377. doi:10.1177/107484071038314510.1177/1074840710383145
19.
CogdillK. (2003). Information needs and information seeking in primary care: A study of nurse practitioners. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91, 203-215. doi:10.1043/0025-7338(2003)091<0203:INAISI>2.0.CO;210.1043/0025-7338(2003)091<0203:INAISI>2.0.CO;2
20.
CrabtreeM. K.PruittR. (2002). Advanced nursing practice: Building curriculum for quality nurse practitioner education. Washington, DC: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties.
21.
CranleyM. S. (1981). Development of a tool for measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nursing Research, 30, 281-284. doi:10.1097/00006199-198109000-0000810.1097/00006199-198109000-00008
22.
DenhamS. A. (2003). Family health: A framework for nursing. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
25.
DuhamelF. (2010). Implementing family nursing: How do we translate knowledge into clinical practice? Part II: The evolution of 20 years of teaching, research, and practice to a Center of Excellence in Family Nursing. Journal of Family Nursing, 16(1), 8-25. doi:10.1177/107484070936020810.1177/1074840709360208
26.
DuvallE. R. (1971). Family development (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
27.
EggenbergerS.ReganM. (2010). Expanding simulation to teach family nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 49, 550-558. doi:10.3928/01484834-20100630-0110.3928/01484834-20100630-01
28.
FeethamS. (1990). Conceptual and methodological issues in research of families. In BellJ.WatsonW.WrightL. (Eds.), The cutting edge of family nursing. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Family Nursing Unit. Retrieved from https://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/45100/3/FNU_CuttingEdge.pdf
29.
FeethamS. L.MeisterS. B.BellJ. M.GillissC. L. (Eds.). (1993). The nursing of families. Theory/research/education/practice. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
FlowersK.St. JohnW.BellJ. M. (2008). The role of the clinical laboratory in teaching and learning family nursing skills. Journal of Family Nursing, 14, 242-267. doi:10.1177/107484070831656210.1177/1074840708316562
31.
FriedmanM. M. (1998). Family nursing: Research, theory & practice (4th ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
32.
GaganM.BergJ.RootS. (2002). Nurse practitioner curriculum for the 21st century: A model for evaluation and revision. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 202-206. PMID: 12025863
33.
GanongL. (2011). Return of the “intimate outsider”: Current trends and issues in family nursing research revisited. Journal of Family Nursing, 17, 416-440. doi:10.1177/107484071142502910.1177/1074840711425029
34.
GillissC. L. (1983). The family as the unit of analysis: Strategies for the nurse researcher. Advances in Nursing Science, 5(3), 50-59. PMID: 6405684
35.
GillissC. (1991). Family nursing research, theory and practice. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(1), 19-22. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00629.x10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00629.x
36.
HansonS. (2005). Family nursing: Challenges and opportunities: Whither thou goeth family nursing. Journal of Family Nursing, 11, 336-339. doi:10.1177/107484070528082110.1177/1074840705280821
37.
HansonS. H.MischkeK. B. (2006). Family systems stressors-strength inventory. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
38.
HansonS. M. (2001). Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
39.
HansonS. M.BoydS. T. (1996). Family nursing: An overview. In HansonS. M.BoydS. T. (Eds.), Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research (2nd ed., pp. 5-37). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
40.
HansonS. M. H.Gedaly-DuffV.KaakinenJ. R. (Eds.). (2005). Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
41.
HartA. M.MacneeC. L. (2007). How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 19(1), 35-42. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x
KaakinenJ. R.Gedaly-DuffV.CoehloD. P.HansonS. M. H. (Eds.). (2010). Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, & research (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis.
44.
Loveland-CherryC. (2006). Where is the family in family interventions?Journal of Family Nursing, 12(1), 4-6. doi:10.1177/107484070528520910.1177/1074840705285209
45.
McCubbinH. I.OlsonD.LarsenA. (1996). FCOPES: Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluation Scales. In McCubbinH. I.ThompsonA. I.McCubbinM. A. (Eds.), Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation—Inventories for research and practice (pp. 455-507). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin System.
46.
McCubbinH. I.PattersonJ. M. (1983). The family stress process: The Double ABCX Model of family adjustment and adaptation. In McCubbinH. I.SussmanM.PattersonJ. M. (Eds.), Social stress and the family: Advances and developments in family stress theory and research (pp. 7-37). New York, NY: Haworth.
47.
McCubbinH. I.PattersonJ. M. (1991). FILE: Family Inventory of Life Events and Changes. In McCubbinH. I.ThompsonA. I. (Eds.), Family assessment inventories for research and practice (pp. 79-98). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
48.
McCubbinM. A.McCubbinH. I. (1987). Family stress theory and assessment: The T-double ABCX Model of family adjustment and adaptation. In McCubbinH. I.ThompsonA. (Eds.), Family assessment inventories for research and practice (pp. 3-32). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
49.
McCubbinM. A.McCubbinH. I. (1991). Family stress theory and assessment: The Resiliency Model of Family Stress Adjustment and Adaptation. In McCubbinH. I.ThompsonA. (Eds.), Family assessment inventories for research and practice (pp. 3-31). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
50.
McCubbinM. A.McCubbinH. I. (1993). Families coping with illness: The Resiliency Model of Family Stress Adjustment and Adaptation. In DanielsonC.Hamel-BissellB.Winstead-FryP. (Eds.), Families, health & illness: Perspectives on coping and intervention (pp. 21-64). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
51.
MercerR. T. (1989). Theoretical perspectives on the family. In GillissC. L.HighleyB. L.RobertsB. M.MartinsonI. M. (Eds.), Toward a science of family nursing (pp. 9-36). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
52.
MüllerM. E.MercerR. (1993). Development of the prenatal attachment inventory. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 199-211. doi:10.1177/01939459930150020510.1177/019394599301500205
National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. (2008, August). Eligibility for NP certification for nurse practitioner students in doctor of nursing practice programs. In Clinical education issues in preparing nurse practitioner students for independent practice: An ongoing series of papers (2010). Retrieved from http://www.nonpf.org/associations/10789/files/ClinicalEducationIssuesPPRFinalApril2010.pdf
National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties Curriculum Guidelines Task Force. (1995). Advanced nursing practice: Curriculum guidelines and program standards for nurse practitioner education (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF).
58.
NicoteriJ.AndrewsC. (2003). The discovery of unique nurse practitioner theory in the literature: Seeking evidence using an integrative review approach. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 15, 494-500. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00338.x10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00338.x
59.
OlsonD. H. (2000). Circumplex model of family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144-167. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.0014410.1111/1467-6427.00144
60.
OlsonD. H. (2008). FACES IV manual. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.
61.
PulciniJ.JelicM.GulR.LokeA. (2010). An international survey on advanced practice nursing education, practice, and regulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42(1), 31-39. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01322.x10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01322.x
62.
RansomD. C. (1983). The family as patient: Part II. Family Systems Medicine, 1(3), 110-113. doi:10.1037/h009010310.1037/h0090103
63.
RaschR.CogdillK. (1999). Nurse practitioners’ information needs and information seeking: Implications for practice and education. Holistic Nursing Practice, 13(4), 90-97. PMID:10661122
64.
RobertsC.FeethamS. (1982). Assessing family functioning across three areas of relationships. Nursing Research, 31, 231-235. doi:10.1097/00006199-198207000-0001110.1097/00006199-198207000-00011
65.
RoyC. (1983). Roy adaptation model. In ClementsI. W.RobertsF. B. (Eds.), Family health: A theoretical approach to nursing care (pp. 255-278). New York, NY: John Wiley.
66.
SchererY.BruceS.MontgomeryC.BallL. (2008). A challenge in academia: Meeting the health care needs of the growing number of older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 20, 471-476. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00350.x10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00350.x
67.
SmilksteinG. (1978). The Family APGAR: A proposal for family function test and its use by physicians. Journal of Family Practice, 6, 1231-1239. PMID: 660126
68.
SullivanJ.DacheletC.SultzH.HenryM. (1978). The rural nurse practitioner: A challenge and a response. American Journal of Public Health, 68, 972-976. doi:10.2105/AJPH.68.10.97210.2105/AJPH.68.10.972
UpholdC. R.HarperD. C. (1986). Methodological issues in intergenerational family nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 38-49. PMID 3083766
71.
UpholdC. R.StricklandO. L. (1989). Issues related to the unit of analysis in family nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 11, 405-417. doi:10.1177/01939459890110040310.1177/019394598901100403
72.
WicksM. N. (1995). Family health as derived from King’s framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
73.
WrightL. M. (2005). Spirituality, suffering, and illness: Ideas for healing. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
74.
WrightL.BellJ. (1989). A survey of family nursing education in Canadian universities. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 21(3), 59-74.
75.
WrightL. M.BellJ. M. (2009). Beliefs and illness: A model for healing. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: 4th Floor Press.
WrightL. M.LeaheyM. (1988, May). Trends in family nursing. Plenary paper presented at the First International Family Nursing Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
79.
WrightL. M.LeaheyM. (1990). Trends in the nursing of families. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 148-154. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01795.x10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01795.x
80.
WrightL. M.LeaheyM. (2005). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
81.
WrightL. M.LeaheyM. (2009). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
82.
ZerwekhJ. V. (1991). A family caregiving model for public health nursing. Nursing Outlook, 39, 213-217. PMID: 1896313
