Emergency contraceptive pills (ECP) are a safe and efficacious backup method of birth control. Despite widespread availability, ECP is underutilized by young women. While partner level of involvement has been shown to influence contraceptive behavior, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding any possible association between partner influence and ECP use. To better understand the reasons for the seemingly underuse of ECP, a grounded theory study was conducted to elucidate the relationship of couple dynamics and knowledge of, attitudes toward, and decision making regarding the use of ECP in coupled young adults. Consistent with contemporary constructivist grounded theory methods, several categories were identified including the meanings associated with ECP use. This article presents an elaboration of this particular finding. The meanings that participants ascribed to ECP use represented a continuum of value attributes regarding ethics, safety, efficacy, and responsibility.
AdamjiJ.SwartoutK. (2010). Advanced provision of emergency contraception for adolescents. Journal of School Nursing, 26, 443-449. doi:10.1177/105984051037776510.1177/1059840510377765
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2005). Emergency contraception (Practice Bulletin No. 69). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 106, 1443-1452.
4.
ArnettJ. (1994). Are college students adults? Their conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 1, 213-224.
5.
ArnettJ. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
6.
BeckC. (2009). Critiquing qualitative research. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses Journal, 90, 543-554.
7.
BeckerS. (1996). Couples and reproductive health: A review of couples studies. Studies in Family Planning, 27, 291-306. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138025
8.
BeckmanL.HarveyM.ShermanC.PetittiD. (2001). Changes in providers’ views and practices about emergency contraception with education. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 97, 942-946.
CampH.HarperW.RaineT. (2003). The benefit and risk of over-the-counter availability of levonorgestrel emergency contraception. Contraception, 68, 309-317. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2003.08.01110.1016/j.contraception.2003.08.011
11.
Center for Disease Control, National Vital Statistics Report. (2009). Estimated pregnancy rates in the United States, 1990-2005: An update (Vol. 58). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_04.pdf
12.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
ChengL.GulmezoqluA.PiaggioG.EzcurraE.Van LookP. (2008). Interventions for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Systems Review, 16, Art. No. CD001324. doi:10.1002/1465185810.1002/14651858
14.
ClarkeA. (2003). Situational analysis: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn [Special issue on Theory and Method]. Symbolic Interactionism, 26, 553-576. doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.4.55310.1525/si.2003.26.4.553
15.
ClarkeA. (2005). Situational analysis grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
CoeytauxF.PillsburyB. (2001). Bringing emergency contraception to American women: The history and remaining challenges. Women’s Health Issues, 11, 80-86.
17.
ColemanL.InghamR. (1999). Exploring young people’s difficulties in talking about contraception: How can we encourage more discussion between partners?Health Education Research, 14, 741-750.
18.
CommendadorK. (2010). Parental influence on adolescent decision making and contraceptive use. Pediatric Nursing, 36, 147-170.
19.
CorbettP.MitchellC.TaylorJ.KemppainenJ. (2006). Emergency contraception: Knowledge and perceptions in a university population. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 18, 161-168.
20.
CroxattoH.DevotoL.DurandM.EzcurraE.LarreaF.NagleC.. . . von HertzenH. (2001). Mechanism of action of hormonal preparations used for emergency contraception: A review of the literature. Contraception, 63, 111-121.
21.
CubbinsL.JordanL.RutterV.TanferK. (2007, March). Who’s the decider: How different dimensions of power are related to partner’s belief about control over the couple’s method choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New York, NY.
22.
DehlendorfC.RodriguezM.LevyK.BorreroS.SteinauerJ. (2010). Disparities in family planning. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 202, 214-220. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.02210.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022
23.
DenzinN. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
24.
FainJ. (2004). Reading, understanding, and applying nursing research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
25.
FreeC.LeeR.OgdenJ. (2002). Young women’s accounts of factors influencing their use and non-use of emergency contraception: In-depth interview study. British Medical Journal, 325, 1393-1398.
26.
FreeC.OgdenJ. (2005). Emergency contraception use and non-use in young women: The application of a contextual and dynamic model. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 237-253.
27.
Gemzell-DanielsonK. (2010). Mechanism of action of emergency contraception. Contraception, 82, 404-409. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.00410.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.004
28.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
29.
GoldM.SucatoG.ConradL.HillardP. (2004). Provision of emergency contraception to adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 35, 67-70.
30.
GoodwinP.McGillB.ChandraA. (2009). Who marries and when? Age at first marriage in the United States: 2002. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief, 19, 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db19.htm
31.
GordonD. (1990). Formal operational thinking: The role of cognitive-developmental processes in adolescent decision-making about pregnancy and contraception. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60, 346-356.
32.
HarperC.RoccaC.DarneyP.von HertzenH.RaineT. (2004). Tolerability of levonorgestrel emergency contraception in adolescents. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 191, 1158-1163. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2006.08.00410.1016/j.pedn.2006.08.004
33.
HensleyA.LappinR. E.WellsK.BaroneB.DaltonV. K. (2010). Adolescent and young adult women’s use of emergency contraception. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 23, 279-284. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2010.03.00310.1016/j.jpag.2010.03.003
34.
LaRossaR.ReitzesD. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In BossP.DohertyW.LaRossaR.SchummW.SteinmetzS. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and methods (pp. 135-166). New York, NY: Plenum.
35.
ManningW.LongmoreM.GiordanoP. (2000). The relationship context at first intercourse. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 104-110.
MillerL. (2011). College students knowledge and attitudes toward emergency contraception. Contraception, 83, 68-73. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.00510.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.005
38.
PolisC.GrimesD.SchafferK.BlanchardK.GlasierA.HarperC. (2010). Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention (full review). Cochrane Database System Review (CD005497). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005497.pub210.1002/14651858.CD005497.pub2
39.
RaineT. R.HarperC. C.RoccaC. H.FischerR.PadianN.KlausnerJ.DarneyP. (2005). Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancies and STIs. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 54-62. doi:10.1001/jama.293.1.5410.1001/jama.293.1.54
40.
RaymondE.TrusselJ.PollisC. (2007). Population effects of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: A systemic review, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109, 181-188.
41.
ReisH.CollinsW.BerscheidE. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844-872. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.126.6.84410.1037/0033–2909.126.6.844
42.
RoccaC.SchwarzE.StewartF.DarneyP.RaineT.HarperC. (2007). Beyond access: Acceptability, use and nonuse of emergency contraception among young women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 196, 29.e1-29.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.02410.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.024
43.
SambolN.HarperC.KimL.LiuC.DarneyP.RaineT. (2006). Pharmacokinetics of single-dose levonorgestrel in adolescents. Contraception, 74, 104-109. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.01.01110.1016/j.contraception.2006.01.011
Society for Adolescent Medicine. (2004). Provision of emergency contraception to adolescents, position paper for the Society of Adolescent Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 35, 66-70. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.04.00510.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.04.005
46.
SteinbergL. (2004). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 9, 69-74. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.00510.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005
47.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (Eds.). (1998). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
48.
TrussellJ.RodriguezG.EllertsonC. (1998). New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regime of emergency contraception. Contraception, 57, 363-369. doi:10.1016/S0010–7824(98)00042–010.1016/S0010–7824(98)00042–0
49.
TrussellJ.SchwarzE.GutherieK.RaymondE. (2008). No such thing as an easy or (EC) fix. Contraception, 78, 351-354. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.06.01810.1016/j.contraception.2008.06.018
50.
TrussellJ.EllertsonC.StewartF.RaymondE.ShochetT. (2004). The role of emergency contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 190, S380-S338. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.06310.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.063
51.
Tuval-MashiachR.ShulmanS. (2006). Resolution of disagreements between romantic partners, among adolescents, and young adults: Qualitative analysis of interaction discourse. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 561-588. doi:10.1111/j.1532–7795.2006.00508.x10.1111/j.1532–7795.2006.00508.x
52.
VahratianA.PatelD.WolffK.XuX. (2008). College students’ perceptions of emergency contraception provision. Journal of Women’s Health, 17, 103-111. doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.039110.1089/jwh.2007.0391
53.
WidmanL.WelshD.McNultyJ.LittleK. (2006). Sexual communication and contraceptive use in adolescent dating couples. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 893-899. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.06.00310.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.06.003
