This article is an invitation to contemplation and dialogue about the purpose of family nursing. The shared ethos of family nursing is explored as a common ground for endeavours in practice and research. Acomparison of ethical principles relating to research, family nursing practice, and Foucault’s meta-ethical framework is offered. Such examination would suggest a remarkable congruence between family nursing values and Foucault’s meta-ethical framework. The implications of such theoretical deliberations are outlined within the context of contemporary issues at a global level. Further support for the relevance of the implications at national level is presented by drawing on examples of challenges for nursing work with families in primary care in the United Kingdom. This article also raises new questions based on a number of suppositions such as family nursing being conceptualized as relational practice with an integrated approach, unifying ethos, and potential of a new paradigm of care.
Bell, J. M. (1997). Levels in undergraduate family nursing education [Editorial]. Journal of Family Nursing, 3(4), 315-317.
2.
Bruntland, G. H. (1999, June). Celebrating nursing’s past—claiming the future—organizational vision. Paper presented at the International Council of Nurses Centennial Conference WHO’s Vision for Health, London. Retrieved October 26, 2004, from www.icn.ch/speechBruntland.htm
3.
Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (2002). Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 27, 2004, from www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t104.e567
4.
Cerinus, M. (2001). The ethics of research. Nurse Researcher, 8(30), 72-89.
5.
Claveirole, A., Mitchell, R., & Whyte, D. A. (2001). Family Nursing Network: Scottish initiative to support family care. British Journal of Nursing, 10(17), 1142-1147.
6.
Cooper, M., & Blair, C. (2002). Foucault’s ethics. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(4), 511-531.
7.
Cortis, J. D., & Kendrick, K. (2003). Nursing ethics, caring and culture. Nursing Ethics, 10(1), 77-88.
8.
A dictionary of nursing. (2003). Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 27, 2004, from www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t62.31
9.
Downie, R. S., & Calman, K. C. (1994). Healthy respect: Ethics in health care (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
Fawcett, J. (2000). Analysis and evaluation of contemporary nursing knowledge and nursing models and theories. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
11.
Feeley, N., & Gottlieb, L. N. (2000). Nursing approaches for working with family strengths and resources. Journal of Family Nursing, 6(1), 9-24.
12.
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity. A practical guide for research in health and social care. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
13.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
14.
Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 by Michel Foucault (pp. 78-108). Harlow, UK: Harvester Press.
15.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777-795.
16.
Foucault, M. (1984). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 340-372). New York: Pantheon.
17.
Foucault, M. (1988). The care of the self. London: Allen Lane, Penguin Press.
18.
Foucault, M. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
19.
Friedman, M. N., Bowden, V. R., & Jones, E. G. (2003). Family nursing: Research, theory and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Giddens, A. (1987). Structuralism, post-structuralism and the production of culture. In A. Giddens & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 195-223). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
21.
Gillies, V., & Alldred, P. (2002). The ethics of intention: Research as a political tool. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 32-52). London: Sage.
22.
Gilliss, C. L. (1991). Family nursing research, theory and practice. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(1), 19-22.
23.
Hanson, S. M. H. (1987). Family nursing and chronic illness. In L. M. Wright & M. Leahey(Eds.), Families and chronic illness (pp. 2-32). Springhouse, PA: Springhouse.
24.
Hanson, S. M. H. (2001). Family health care nursing: Theory, practice and research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
25.
Hartrick Doane, G., & Varcoe, C. (2005). Family nursing as relational inquiry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
26.
International Council of Nurses. (2004). ICN on nursing and development policy background paper. Retrieved October 26, 2004, from www.icn.ch/olicy_paper1.htm
27.
Kelly, S. G., & Symonds, A. (2003). The social construction of community nursing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Macduff, C., & West, B. J. M. (2004). An evaluation of an educational program to prepare family health nurses. Nurse Education Today, 24, 575-583.
30.
Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J., & Miller, T. (2002). Ethics in qualitative research. London: Sage.
31.
Michel Foucault. (2004). Wikipedia encyclopaedia. Retrieved December 29, 2004, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault
32.
Minuchin, S. (1996). Families and family therapy. London: Routledge Tavistock.
33.
Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2002). The code of professional conduct: Protecting the public through professional standards. London: Author.
34.
O’Sullivan Burchard, D. J. H., Claveirole, A., Mitchell, R., Walford, C., & Whyte, D. A. (2004). Family nursing in Scotland. Journal of Family Nursing, 10(6), 323-337.
35.
The Oxford American dictionary of current English. (1999). Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 27, 2004, www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t21.e10484
36.
Scottish Executive Research. (2001). Research governance framework for health and community care. Scotland, UK: Chief Scientist Office. Retrieved October 26, 2004, from www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Research/16877/6933%23framework
37.
Scottish Executive Health Department. (2003). Evaluating family health nursing through education and practice. Retrieved October 27, 2004, from www.scottishexecutive.gov.uk/cru/resfinds/efht-00.asp
38.
Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (Eds.). (2004). The concise Oxford English dictionary. Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 27, 2004, www.oxfordreference.com/view/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t23.e18914
39.
Speake, J. (Ed.). (1999). The Oxford essential dictionary of foreign terms in English. Berkley Books, Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 27, 2004, from www.oxfordreference.com/vies/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t33.e2286
40.
Stickley, T., & Freshwater, D. (2002). The art of loving and the therapeutic relationship. Nursing Inquiry, 9(4), 250-256.
41.
Tapp, D. M. (2000). The ethics of relational stance in family nursing: Resisting the view of “nurse as expert.”Journal of Family Nursing, 6(1), 69-91.
42.
Tapp, D. M., Moules, N. J., Bell, J. M., & Wright, L. M. (1997). Family skills lab: Facilitating the development of family nursing skills in the undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Family Nursing, 3(3), 247-266.
43.
Whyte, D. A. (1994). The case of cystic fibrosis. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
44.
World Health Organization. (1986, November). The move towards a new public health: Ottawa charter for health promotion. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Health Promotion, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
45.
World Health Organization. (1998). Health 21: The health for all policy framework in the 21st century. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
46.
Wright, L. M., & Leahey, M. (2000). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
47.
Wright, L. M., & Leahey, M. (2005). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (4th ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
48.
Wright, L. M., Watson, W. L., & Bell, J. M. (1996). Beliefs: The heart of healing in families and illness. New York: Basic Books.
