Many of the persistent problems in family measurement are due to inappropriate applications of theory, fuzzy conceptualizations of constructs, poor decisions regarding units of measurement, and disconnections between what researchers want to measure and how they operationalize their variables of interest. This article contains a series of tasks for family researchers to follow in planning their investigations that will help them avoid fundamental family measurement problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartle-Haring, S., Kenny, D., & Gavazzi, S. (1999). Multiple perspectives on family differentiation: Analyses by multtrait-multimethod matrix and triadic social relations model . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 491-503 .
2.
Bartle-Haring, S., & Sabatelli, R. (1998, November 14). Can we “see” family functioning at a system level and would it matter if we could? Paper presented at the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations Preconference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
3.
Bell, L., Paul, D., Tribble, D. S.-C., & Goulet, C. (2000). Strategies to elicit and analyze relational family data . Journal of Family Nursing, 6, 380-399 .
4.
Blalock, H. (1982). Conceptualization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
5.
Buehler, C. (2001). Adjustment. In J. Touliatos, B. Perlmutter, & M. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques (pp. 247-259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
6.
Chao, J., Zyzanski, S., & Flocke, S. (1998). Choosing a family level indicator of family function . Families, Systems, & Health, 16, 367-374 .
7.
Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1288-1307 .
8.
Cooley, M., & Moriarty, H. J. (1997). An analysis of empirical studies examining the impact of cancer diagnosis and treatment of an adult on family functioning . Journal of Family Nursing, 3, 318-347 .
9.
Cox, R. P., & Davis, L. (1999). Family problem-solving: Measuring the elusive concept . Journal of Family Nursing, 5, 332-360 .
10.
Davis, L. (1993). Family scores revisited: A comparison of three approaches to data aggregation . Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 649-657 .
11.
Deal, J. E. (1995). Utilizing data from multiple family members: A within-family approach . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1109-1121 .
12.
Feetham, S. L. (1984). Family research: Issues and directions for nursing. In H. H. Werley & J. J. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research (pp. 3-16). New York: Springer .
13.
Feetham, S. L. (1991). Conceptual and methodological issues in research of families. In A. Whall & J. Fawcett (Eds.), Family theory development in nursing: State of the art and science (pp. 55-68). Philadelphia: Davis .
14.
Fincham, F. (1998). Child development and marital relations . Child Development, 69, 543-574 .
15.
Fisher, L. (1982). Transactional theories but individual assessment: A frequent discrepancy in family research . Family Process, 21, 313-320 .
16.
Fisher, L., Kokes, R. F., Ransom, D. C., Phillips, S. L., & Rudd, P. (1985). Alternative strategies for creating relational family data . Family Process, 24, 213-224 .
17.
Ganong, L. (2001). Measuring family adjustment, health, and well-being. In J. Touliatos, M. Perlmutter, & M. Straus (Eds.), Second handbook on family measurement techniques (Vol. 2, pp. 205-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
18.
Holder, B., Turner-Musa, J., Kimmel, P. L., Alleyne, S., Kobrin, S., & Simmens, S., et al. (1998). Engagement of African American families in research on chronic illness: A multi-system recruiting approach . Family Process, 37, 127-151 .
19.
Knafl, K., & Gilliss, C. (2002). Families and chronic illness: A synthesis of current research . Journal of Family Nursing, 8(3), 178-198 .
20.
Larsen, A., & Olson, D. (1990). Capturing complexity of family systems: Integrating family theory, family scores, and family analysis. In T. W. Draper & A. C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use (pp. 19-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
21.
Larzelere, R. E., & Klein, D. M. (1987). Methodology. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 125-155). New York: Plenum .
22.
Maguire, M. L. (1999). Treating the dyad as the unit of analysis: A primer on three analytic approaches . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 213-223 .
23.
Melby, J. N., Conger, R., Ge, X., & Warner, T. D. (1995). The use of structural equation modeling in assessing the quality of marital observations . Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 280-293 .
24.
Morse, J. (2002, August). Ethnography . Paper presented at the Thinking Qualitatively Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
25.
Ransom, D. C., Fisher, L., Phillips, S., Kokes, R. F., & Weiss, R. (1990). The logic of measurement in family research. In T. W. Draper & A. C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use (pp. 48-63). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
26.
Robinson, C. A. (1995). Unifying distinctions for nursing research with persons and families . Journal of Family Nursing, 1, 8-29 .
27.
Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Measurement issues in marital research: A review and critique of contemporary survey instruments . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 891-915 .
28.
Sabatelli, R., & Waldron, R. (1995). Measurement issues in the assessment of the experiences of parenthood . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 969-980 .
29.
Sidani, S., & Jones, E. (1995). Use of the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) to analyze family relational data . Western Journal of Nursing Research, 17, 556-581 .
30.
Tapp, D. (1995). Impact of ischemic heart disease: Family nursing research, 1984-1993 . Journal of Family Nursing, 1, 79-104 .
31.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1982). The dyad as a unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 889-900 .
32.
Thomson, E., & Williams, R. (1982). Beyond wives' family sociology: A method for analyzing couple data . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 999-1008 .
33.
Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B., & Holden, G. (Eds.). (2001a). Handbook of family measurement techniques (Vol. 2). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
34.
Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B., & Holden, G. (Eds.). (2001b). Handbook of family measurement techniques (Vol. 3). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
35.
Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B., & Straus, M. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of family measurement techniques (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
36.
Uphold, C. R., & Strickland, O. L. (1989). Issues related to the unit of analysis in family nursing research . Western Journal of Nursing Research, 11, 405-417 .
37.
Whall, A. L., & Loveland-Cherry, C. J. (1993). Family unit-focused research: 1984-1991. In J. J. Fitzpatrick, R. L. Taunton, & A. K. Jacox (Eds.), Annual reviews of nursing research (pp. 227-247). New York: Springer .
