Many students who experience difficulty with mathematics may also require behavioral support. We suggest educators create an appropriate scope and sequence for mathematics intervention by focusing on the critical mathematics content. Educators can then design the intervention with a common session structure. Finally, educators can embed and intensify supports for a student by increasing the dosage, focusing on the alignment of the intervention, and attending to transfer.
AlterP. (2012). Helping students with emotional and behavioral disorders solve mathematics word problems. Preventing School Failure, 56, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2011.565283
2.
BeaversG. A.IwataB. A.LermanD. C. (2013). Thirty years of research in the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.30
3.
BenzS. A.PowellS. R. (2021). The influence of behavior on performance within a word-problem intervention for students with mathematics difficulty. Remedial and Special Education, 42, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520923063
4.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.StenzelK. (2020). Virtual manipulatives as assistive technology to support students with disabilities with mathematics. Preventing School Failure, 64(4), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1762157
5.
BryantB. R.BryantD. P.PorterfieldJ.DennisM. S.FalcomataT.ValentineC.BrewerC.BellK. (2016). The effects of a tier 3 intervention on the mathematics performance of second grade students with severe mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538516
6.
CareyE.HillF.DevineA.SzücsD. (2016). The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01987
7.
CookS. C.CollinsL. W.MorinL. L.RiccominiP. J. (2020). Schema-based instruction for mathematics word problem solving: An evidence-based review for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718823080
8.
DoablerC. T.BakerS. K.KostyD. B.SmolkowskiK.ClarkeB.MillerS. J.FienH. (2015). Examining the association between explicit mathematics instruction and student mathematics achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 115(3), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/679969
9.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.KostyD.Kurtz-NelsonE.FienH.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K. (2019). Examining the impact of group size on the treatment intensity of a tier 2 mathematics intervention within a systematic framework of replication. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418789376
10.
DuPaulG. J.VolpeR. J. (2009). ADHD and learning disabilities: Research findings and clinical implications. Current Attention Disorders Reports, 1(4), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12618-009-0021-4
11.
EddyC. M.FuentesS. Q.WardE. K.ParkerY. A.CooperS.JasperW. A.MallamW. S.SortoM. A.WilkersonT. L. (2015). Unifying the algebra for all movement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14562393
12.
EnnisR. P.LosinskiM. (2019). SRSD fractions: Helping students at risk for disabilities add/subtract fractions with unlike denominators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(5), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419859509
13.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.SchellmanL. E. (2018). Behavior-specific praise: An effective, efficiency, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618798587
14.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.BurtonM. E. (2016). Teaching problem solving to students receiving tiered interventions using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence and schema-based instruction. Preventing School Failure, 60(4), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1164117
15.
FuchsL. S.BuckaN.ClarkeB.DoughertyB.JordanN. C.KarpK. S.WoodwardJ. (2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in the elementary grades. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
16.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.AppletonA. C. (2002). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on the mathematical problem-solving performance of students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00036
17.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MaloneA. S. (2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(4), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918758166
18.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.CirinoP. T.SchumacherR. F.MarrinS.HamlettC. L.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.ChangasP. C. (2014). Does calculation or word-problem instruction provide a stronger route to pre-algebraic knowledge?Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036793
19.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.SterbaS. K.CraddockC.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.GearyD. C.ChangasP. (2021). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467
GundersonE. A.ParkD.MaloneyE. A.BeilockS. L.LevineS. C. (2018). Reciprocal relations among motivational frameworks, math anxiety, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1421538
22.
HughesC. A.MorrisJ. R.TherrienW. J.BensonS. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142
23.
JitendraA. K.LeinA. E.ImS.AlghamdiA. A.HefteS. B.MouanoutouaJ. (2018). Mathematical interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917737467
24.
JitendraA. K.Petersen-BrownS.LeinA. E.ZaslofskyA. F.KunkelA. K.JungP.-G.EganA. M. (2015). Teaching mathematics word problem solving: The quality of evidence for strategy instruction priming the problem structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487108
25.
Justicia-GalianoM. J.Martín-PugaM. E.LinaresR.PelegrinaS. (2017). Math anxiety and math performance in children: The mediating roles of working memory and math self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12165
26.
KernL.WehbyJ. H. (2014). Using data to intensity behavioral interventions for individual students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522970
27.
KorinekL.deFurS. H. (2016). Supporting student self-regulation to access the general education curriculum. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(5), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915626134
28.
LaneK. L.Barton-ArwoodS. M.NelsonJ. R.WehbyJ. (2008). Academic performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders served in a self-contained setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.10007/s10864-007-9050-1
29.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2018). Effective low-intensity strategies to enhance school success: What every educator needs to know. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618799044
30.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. S. (2018). Instructional choice: An effective, efficiency, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618786965
31.
LeonJ.Medina-GarridoE.NúñezJ. L. (2017). Teaching quality in math class: The development of a scale and the analysis of its relationship with engagement and achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00895
32.
MontagueM.KrawecJ.EndersC.DietzS. (2014). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle-school students of varying ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035176
33.
MoranoS.MarkelzA. M.RandolphK. M.MyersA. M.ChurchN. (2021). Motivation matters: Three strategies to support motivation and engagement in mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 57, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451221994803
34.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.MaczugaS. (2015). Which instructional practices most help first-grade students with and without mathematics difficulties?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714536608
35.
MulcahyC. A.KrezmienM. P. (2009). Effects of a contextualized instructional package on the mathematics performance of secondary students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 34(3), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290903400303
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through Grade 8 mathematics.
38.
OakesW. P.LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.BuckmanM. M. (2018). Instructional feedback: An effective, efficiency, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618799354
39.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2016). Schema-based strategy instruction and the mathematical problem-solving performance of two students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 521–544. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0023
40.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2017). A meta-analysis of schema instruction on the problem-solving performance of elementary school students. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317720163
41.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2018). Using the concrete representational abstract (CRA) instructional framework for mathematics with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 62(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1354809
42.
Petersen-BrownS.LundbergA. R.RayJ. E.Dela PazI. N.RissC. L.PanahonC. J. (2019). Applying spaced practice in the schools to teach math vocabulary. Psychology in the Schools, 56, 977–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22248
43.
PowellS. R.BerryK. A.FallA.-M.RobertsG.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2021). Alternative paths to improved word-problem performance: An advantage for embedding pre-algebraic reasoning instruction within word-problem intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 898–910. https://doi.org.10.1037/edu0000513
44.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S. (2018). Effective word-problem instruction: Using schemas to facilitate mathematical reasoning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777250
45.
PowellS. R.NamkungJ. M.LinX. (in press). An investigation of using keywords to solve word problems. The Elementary School Journal. https://doi.org10.1086/717888
46.
PowellS. R.SteckerP. M. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify mathematics intervention for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914523735
47.
ReidR.GonzalezJ. E.NordnessP. D.TroutA.EpsteinM. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/behavioral disturbance. The Journal of Special Education, 38(3), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380030101
48.
RiccominiP. J.StockerJ. D.Jr.MoranoS. (2017). Implementing an effective mathematics fact fluency practice activity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(5), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916685053
49.
SchumacherR. F.Zumeta EdmondsR.ArdenS. V. (2017). Examining implementation of intensive intervention in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12141
50.
ScottT. M.LandrumT. J. (2020). An evidence-based logic for the use of positive reinforcement: Responses to typical criticisms. Beyond Behavior, 29(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295620917153
51.
StevensE. A.RodgersM. A.PowellS. R. (2018). Mathematics interventions for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517731887
52.
SwoszowskiN. C. (2013). Adapting a Tier 2 behavioral intervention, check-in/check-out, to meet students’ needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451213509485
53.
VannestK. J.BurkeM. D.SauberS. B.DavisJ. L.DavisC. R. (2011). Daily behavior report cards as evidence-based practice for teachers. Beyond Behavior, 20(2), 13–21.
54.
WuS. S.WillcuttE. G.EscovarE.MenonV. (2014). Mathematics achievement and anxiety and their relation to internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(6), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412473154
