Although the good behavior game (GBG) has a long empirical record for effectively decreasing inappropriate student behavior, there are fewer studies that have targeted improving appropriate behavior. This article describes why and how the GBG can be used by teachers across grade levels and situations to increase student appropriate behavior and benefit teachers.
BarrishH. H.SaundersM.WolfM. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124. doi:10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119
2.
*Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.ZainiS.ZhangN.VannestK. (2016). Promoting positive behavior using the good behavior game: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Journal of Positive Behavior Support, 18, 180–190. doi:10.1177/1098300715592355
3.
BreemanL. D.van LierP. A. C.WubbelsT.VerhulstF. C.van der EndeJ.MarasA.. . . TickN. T. (2016). Effects of the good behavior game on the behavioral, emotional, and social problems of children with psychiatric disorders in special education settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 156–167. doi:10.1177/1098300715593466
4.
CayirdagN. (2016). Creativity fostering teaching: Impact of creative self-efficacy and teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences, 17, 1959–1975. doi:10.12738/estp.2017.6.0437
5.
Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education. (2006, August). Report on the teacher needs survey. Washington, DC: Center for Psychology in Schools and Education, American Psychological Association.
6.
*DonaldsonJ. M.MatterA. L.WiskowK. M. (2018). Feasibility of and teacher preference for student-led implementation of the good behavior game in early elementary classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 118–129. doi:10.1002/jaba.432
7.
*ElswickS.CaseyL. B. (2011). The good behavior game is no longer just an effective intervention for students: An examination of the reciprocal effects on teacher behaviors. Beyond Behavior, 21, 36–46.
8.
EmbryD. D. (2002). The good behavior game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273–297.
9.
*GalbraithL. A.NormandM. P. (2017). Step it up! Using the good behavior game to increase physical activity with elementary school students at recess. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 856–860. doi:10.1002/jaba.402
10.
HermanK. C.Hickmon-RosaJ. E.ReinkeW. M. (2018). Empirically derived profiles of teacher stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and copying and associated student outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 90–100. doi:10.1177/1098300717732066
11.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2018). Effective low-intensity strategies to enhance school success: What every educator needs to know. Beyond Behavior, 27, 128–133. doi:10.1177/1074295618799044
12.
LastrapesR. E. (2016). Let us play: Using research-based games to facilitate effective instruction. Beyond Behavior, 25, 27–33. doi:10.1177/107429561602500305
13.
LitowL.PumroyD. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341–347. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-341
14.
*MaagJ. W. (2018). Behavior management: From theoretical implications to practical applications (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
15.
MooneyP.RyanJ. B. (2018). Supporting professionals in becoming skilled classroom managers of behavior. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 127. doi:10.1177/1074295618804525
16.
RamirezL. H.HawkinsR. O.CollinsT. A.RitterC.HaydonT. (2019). Generalizing the effects of group contingencies across instructional settings for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Review, 48, 98–112. doi:10.17105/SPR-2017-0122.V48-1
17.
ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C.StormontM. (2013). Classroom-level positive behavior supports in schools implementing SW-PBIS: Identifying areas for enhancement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15, 39–50. doi:10.1177/1098300712459079
18.
*RhodeG.JensonW. R.ReavisH. K. (1992). The tough kid book: Practical classroom management strategies. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
19.
RubowC. C.VollmerT. R.JoslynP. R. (2018). Effects of the good behavior game on students and teacher behavior in an alternative school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 382–392. doi:10.1002/jaba.455
20.
SchwartzI. S.BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
21.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaneK. L. (2016). Embedding interventions to promote self-determination within multitier systems of supports. Exceptionality, 24, 213–224. doi:10.1080/09362835.2015.1064421
22.
SweigartC. A.CollinsL. W.EvanovichL. L.CookS. C. (2016). Evaluation of the evidence base for performance feedback to improve teacher praise using CEC’s quality indicators. Education and Treatment of Children, 39, 419–444. doi:10.1353/etc.2016.0019
23.
TanolG.JohnsonL.McComasJ.CoteE. (2010). Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the good behavior game with kindergarten students. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 337–355. doi:10.1016/j.jsp. 2010.06.001
24.
Van AckerR.GrantS. H.HenryD. (1996). Teacher and student behavior as a function of risk for aggression. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 316–334.
25.
*WahlE.HawkinsR. O.HaydonT.MarsicanoR.MorrisonJ. Q. (2016). Comparing versions of the good behavior game: Can a positive spin enhance effectiveness?Behavior Modification, 40, 493–517. doi:10.1177/0145445516644220
26.
*WrightR. A.McCurdyB. L. (2011). Class-wide positive behavior support and group contingencies: Examining a positive variation of the good behavior game. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 173–180. doi:10.1177/1098300711421008
