Precorrection is a low-intensity strategy that focuses on preventing problem behaviors from occurring by providing reminders for appropriate responding, context modification to support student success, and reinforcement for appropriate responding. In this article, we describe a step-by-step process for using precorrection. Throughout the article, we offer lessons from the field featuring the perspectives of practitioners who have successfully implemented this easy-to-use strategy with students, including those at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders.
BrossL. A.CommonE. A.OakesW. P.LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P. (2018). High-probability request sequence: An effective, efficient, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27. doi: 10.1177/1074295618798615
2.
ColvinG.SugaiG.GoodR. H.IIILeeY.-Y. (1997). Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(4), 344-363. doi: 10.1037/h0088967
3.
ColvinG.SugaiG.PatchingW. (1993). Precorrection: An instructional approach for managing predictable problem behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 143–150. doi:10.1177/105345129302800304
4.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Author.
5.
De PryR.SugaiG. (2002). The effect of active supervision and pre-correction on minor behavioral incidents in a sixth grade general education classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 255–267. doi:10.1023/A:1021162906622
6.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.GriffithC. (2017). A systematic review of precorrection in PK-12 settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 40, 465–495.
7.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.SchellmanL. E. (2018). Behavior-specific praise: An effective, efficient low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27. doi:10.1177/1074295618798587
8.
EnnisR. P.SchwabJ.JolivetteK. (2012). Using precorrection as a secondary-tier intervention for reducing problem behaviors in instructional and non-instructional settings. Beyond Behavior, 22, 40–47.
9.
FaulA.StepenskyK.SimonsenB. (2012). The effects of prompting appropriate behavior on the off-task behavior of two middle school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 47–55. doi:10.1177/1098300711410702
10.
HaydonT.KroegerS. D. (2016). Active supervision, precorrection, and explicit timing: A high school case study on classroom behavior. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60, 70–78. doi:10.1080/1045988x.2014.977213
11.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2015). Supporting behavior for school success: A step-by-step guide to key strategies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2018). Effective low-intensity strategies to enhance school success: What every educator needs to know. Beyond Behavior, 27. doi: 10.1177/1074295618799044
13.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. S. (2018). Instructional choice: An effective, efficient, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27. doi: 10.1177/1074295618786965
14.
LosinskiM.MaagJ. W.KatsiyannisA.EnnisR. P. (2014). Examining the quality and effects of interventions based on the assessment of contextual variables: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 80, 407–422.
15.
MiaoY.DarchC.RabrenK. (2002). Use of precorrection strategies to enhance reading performance of students with learning and behavior problems. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 162–174.
16.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M., (2015). Low-intensity strategies: A look at precorrection. A comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered model of prevention professional learning module. Retrieved from http://www.ci3t.org/pl
17.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.MessengerM. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K-12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 89–107. doi:10.1177/0198742916688655
18.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2018). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on k–12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932517751054
19.
ScottT. S. (2017, November). Effective strategies for students with challenging behavior: The logic of PBIS. A workshop presented at Homewood City Schools, Homewood, AL.
20.
SmithS. C.LewisT. J.StormontM. A. (2011). The effectiveness of two universal behavioral supports for children with externalizing behavior in Head Start classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 133–143.
21.
SpragueJ.ThomasT. (1997). The effect of a neutralizing routine on problem behavior performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 325–334
