Teachers are faced with the challenge of selecting interventions that are most likely to be effective and best matched to the function of problem behavior. This article will define aspects of the instructional environment and describe a decision-making logic to select environmental variables. A summary of commonly used function-based interventions will be provided through two students: one who engages in problem behavior to access peer attention and another who engages in problem behavior to escape work tasks.
ArcherA.HughesC. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
BelfioreP. J.BasileS. P.LeeD. L. (2008). Using a high probability command sequence to increase classroom compliance: The role of behavioral momentum. Journal of Behavioral Education, 172, 160–171.
3.
CarrE. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816.
4.
CarrJ. E.SevertsonJ. M.LepperT. L. (2008). Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 301, 44–57.
5.
CarterM.KempC. R. (1996). Strategies for task analysis in special education. Educational Psychology, 162, 155–170.
6.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
7.
DetrichR. (2014). Treatment integrity: Fundamental to education reform. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 13, 258–271. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.13.2.258
8.
ErvinR. A.RadfordP. M.BertschK.PiperA. L.EhrhardtK. E.PolingA. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 302, 193–210.
9.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Education Research Journal, 341, 174–206.
10.
GannC. J.FerroJ. B.UmbreitJ.LiaupsinC. J. (2014). Effects of a comprehensive function-based intervention applied across multiple educational settings. Remedial and Special Education, 351, 50–60. doi:10.1177/0741932513501088
11.
GeigerK. B.CarrJ. E.LeBlancL. A. (2010). Function-based treatments for escape-maintained problem behavior for practicing behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 31, 22–32.
12.
GreshamF. M.GansleK. A.NoellG. H. (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257–263.
13.
HirschS. E.MacSuga-GageA.ParkK.DillonS. E. (2016). A road map to systematically setting up a group contingency. Beyond Behavior, 25, 21–29.
14.
IngramK.Lewis-PalmerT.SugaiG. (2005). Function-based intervention planning: Comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 74, 224–236.
15.
MathesonA. S.ShriverM. D. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: Effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 342, 202–219.
16.
MillerP. S. (2009). Validated practices for teaching students with diverse needs and abilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
17.
O’NeillR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.SpragueJ. R.StoreyK.NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C.StormontM. (2013). Classroom-level positive behavior supports in schools implementing SW-PBIS: Identifying areas for enhancement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15, 39–50.
20.
ScottT. M.HirnR. G. (2014). Addressing challenging behavior: Considering the logic of probability. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49, 313–316.
21.
ScottT. M.McIntyreJ.LiaupsinC.NelsonC. M.ConroyM.PayneL. D. (2005). An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 74, 205–215.
22.
StormontM.ReinkeW.HermanK. (2011). Teachers’ characteristics and ratings for evidence-based behavioral interventions. Behavioral Disorders, 371, 19–29.
23.
SugaiG.SpragueJ. R.HornerR. H.WalkerH. M. (2000). Preventing school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 94–101. doi:10.1177/106342660000800205
24.
TheodoreL. A.BrayM. A.KehleT. J.JensonW. R. (2001). Randomization of group contingencies to reduce the disruptive behaviors of adolescent students in special Education. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 267–277.
25.
TrussellR. P.LewisT.RaynorC. (2016). The impact of universal teacher practices and function-based behavior interventions on the rates of problem behaviors among at-risk students. Education & Treatment of Children, 393, 261–282.
