AlbertoP. A., & TroutmanA. C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
2.
AxelrodS. (1998). How to use group contingencies. In HallR.V., & HallM.L. (Series Eds.). How to manage behavior series.Austin, TX: pro-ed.
3.
CampbellA., RodriguezB. J., AndersonC., & BarnesA. (2013). Effects of CICO on disruptive behavior.Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7, 32–54.
4.
CooperJ. O., HeronT. E., & HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
5.
DamonS., Riley-TillmanT., & FiorelloC. (2008). Comparing methods of identifying reinforcing stimuli in school consultation.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 31–53.
6.
DaviesS., & WitteR. (2000). Self-management and peer-monitoring within a group contingency to decrease uncontrolled verbalizations of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Psychology in the Schools, 37, 135–147.
7.
EpsteinM., AtkinsM., CullinanD., KutashK., & WeaverR. (2008). Reducing behavior problems in the elementary school classroom: A practice guide (NCEE#2008-012). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides
8.
FarleyC., TorresC., WailehuaC. T., & CookL. (2012). Evidence-based practices for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Improving academic achievement.Beyond Behavior, 21(2), 37–43.
9.
FranzenK., & KampsD. (2008). The utilization and effects of positive behavior support strategies on an urban school playground.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 150–161.
10.
GageN. A., & McDanielS. (2012). Creating smarter classrooms: Data-based decision-making for effective classroom management.Beyond Behavior, 22, 48–55.
11.
GreenwoodC. R., & HopsH. (1981). Group-oriented contingencies and peer behavior change. In StrainP. S. (Ed.), The utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents (pp. 189–259). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
12.
GreshamF., & GreshamG. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior.Journal of Special Education, 16, 101–110.
13.
HeeringP. W., & WilderD. A. (2006). The use of dependent group contingencies to increase on-task behavior in two general education classrooms.Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 459–468.
14.
HermanS. H., & TramontanaJ. (1971). Instructions and group versus individual reinforcement in modifying disruptive group behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 113–119.
15.
JonesM., BoonR. T., ForeC., & BenderW. N. (2008). Our mystery hero! A group contingency intervention for reducing verbally disrespectful behaviors.Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 61–69.
16.
KampsD., WillsH. P., Heitzman-PowellL., LaylinJ., SzokeC., PetrilloT., & CuleyA. (2011). Class-wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 154–167. doi:10.1177/1098300711398935
17.
KerrM. M., & NelsonC. M. (2002). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
18.
LeeD. L., VostalB., & LyloB. (2011). Collecting behavioral data in general education settings: A primer for behavior data collection,Beyond Behavior,20, 22–30.
19.
LingS. M., & BarnettD. W. (2013). Increasing preschool student engagement during group learning activities using a group contingency.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33, 186–196.
20.
LitowL., & PumroyD. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-orientated contingencies.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341–347.
21.
LittleS. G., Akin-LittleA., & O'NeilK. (2015). Group contingency interventions with children—1980-2010: A meta-analysis.Behavior Modification, 39, 322–341.
22.
MichaelJ. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.
23.
NelsonJ. R., OliverR. M., HebertM. A., & BohatyJ. (2015). Use of self-monitoring to maintain program fidelity of multi-tiered interventions.Remedial and Special Education, 36, 14–19.
24.
OliverR. M., WehbyJ. J., & NelsonJ. R. (2015). Helping teachers maintain classroom management practices using a self-monitoring checklist.Teaching & Teacher Education, 51, 113–120.
25.
ParkK. L. (2016). Integrating student preferences with a Classwide Reinforcer Survey.Manuscript in preparation.
26.
PiazzaC. C., FisherW. W., HagopianL. P., BowmanL. G., & TooleL. (1996). Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 1–9.
27.
RomeoF. F. (1998). The negative effects of using a group contingency system of classroom management.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 130–133.
SkinnerC. H., SkinnerC. F., SkinnerA. L., & CashwellT. H. (1999). Using interdependent contingencies with group of students: Why the principal kissed a pig.Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 806–820.
30.
SmithR. G., & IwataB. A. (1997). Antecedent influences on behavior disorders.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 343–375.
31.
StageS. A., & QuirozD. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings.School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
32.
ThorneS., & KampsD. (2008). The effects of a group contingency intervention on academic engagement and problem behavior of at-risk students.Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(2), 12–18.
33.
WeiR. C., Darling-HammondL., AndreeA., RichardsonN., & OrphanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
34.
WeisR., OsborneK., & DeanE. (2015). Effectiveness of a universal, interdependent group contingency program on children's academic achievement: A countywide evaluation.Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31, 199–218.