BondR., & CastagneraE. (2006). Peer supports and inclusive education: An underutilized resource.Theory into Practice, 45(3), 224–229, doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4503_4
2.
Bowman-PerrottL., GreenwoodC. R., & TapiaY. (2007). The efficacy of CWPT used in secondary alternative school classrooms with small teacher/pupil ratios and students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 65–87, doi:10.1353/etc.2007.0014
3.
Bowman-PerrottL., DavisH., VannestK., WilliamsL., GreenwoodC., & ParkerR. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research.School Psychology Review, 42(1), 39–55.
4.
KampsD. M., GreenwoodC., Arreaga-MayerC., VeerkampM. B., UtleyC., TapiaY. …, & BannisterH. (2008). The efficacy of classwide peer tutoring in middle schools.Education and Treatment of Children, 31(2), 119–152.
5.
KernL., BambaraL., & FogtJ. (2002). Classwide curricular modification to improve the behavior of students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 27, 317–326.
6.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: 1990 to present. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York: Guilford Press.
7.
MasonL. H., & HedinL. R. (2011). Reading science text: Challenges for students with learning disabilities and considerations for teachers.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 211–222, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00342.x
8.
MastropieriM. A., ScruggsT. E., NorlandJ. J., BerkeleyS., McDuffieK., TornquistE. H., & ConnorsN. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests.The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130–137.
9.
McIntoshK., SadlerC., & BrownJ. A. (2012). Kindergarten reading skill level and change as risk factors for chronic problem behavior.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(1), 17–28, doi: 10.1177/1098300711403153
10.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2006). America's lab report: Investigations in high school science. Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision., SingerS. R., HiltonM. L., & SchweingruberH. A. (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
11.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core idea.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
12.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
13.
ScruggsT. E., MastropieriM. A., BerkeleyS., & GraetzJ. E. (2010). Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? A meta-analysis.Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 437–449.
TherrienW. J., TaylorJ. C., HospJ. L., KaldenbergE. R., & GorshJ. (2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 188–203.
16.
TherrienW. J., TaylorJ., WattS., & KaldenbergE. (2014). Science instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Remedial and Special Education, 35(1), 15–27.