BerrongA., SchusterJ. W., MorseT. E., & CollinsB. C. (2007). The effects of response cards on active participation and social behavior of students with moderate and severe disabilities.Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 19, 187–199, doi:10.1007/s10882-007-9047-7
2.
CarpenterT. P., & MoserJ. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179–202, doi:10.2307/748348
3.
ChenZ. (1999). Schema induction in children'555s analogical problem solving.Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 703–715, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.703
4.
ChristleC. A., & SchusterJ. W. (2003). The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class, math instruction.Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 147–165.
5.
DavisL. L., & O'NeillR. E. (2004). Use of response cards with a group of students with learning disabilities including those for whom English is a second language.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 219–222.
6.
GardnerR., HewardW. L., & GrossiT. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71, doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27–63
7.
GeorgeC. L. (2010). Effects of response cards on performance and participation in social studies for middle school students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 35, 200–213.
8.
HodgeJ., RiccominiP. J., BufordR., & HerbstM. H. (2006). A review of instructional interventions in mathematics for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 31, 297–311.
9.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
10.
JitendraA. K., GriffinC. C., Deatline-BuchmanA., & SczesniakE. (2007). Mathematical word problem solving in third-grade classrooms.Journal of Educational Research, 100, 283–302.
11.
JitendraA. K., GriffinC. C., McGoeyK., GardillM., BhatP., & RileyT. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities.Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345–355, doi:10.1080/00220679809597564
12.
LambertM., CartledgeG., HewardW. L., & LoY. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 88–99.
13.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.http://standards.nctm.org (Accessed October 22, 2011).
14.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
15.
TempletonT., NeelR. S., & BloodE. (2008). Meta-analysis of math interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 226–239.
16.
XinY., JitendraA. K., & Deatline-BuchmanA. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems.Journal of Special Education, 39, 181–192.