Abstract
The hypothesis that matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors reduce risks of cardiovascular disease in humans is plausible, unproven, and difficult to test, due, in part, to differences in specificity and route of administration. Endogenous tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) are tight-binding, protein inhibitors that function in vivo and can be engineered to enhance specificity for desired targets. Nonetheless, TIMPs have been difficult to test, in part, because their secondary functions, including cell growth promotion and angiogenesis, raise concerns about side effects and they cannot be delivered orally. In contrast, doxycycline and other chemically modified tetracyclines are broad-spectrum, reversible MMP inhibitors with lower affinity but can be taken orally and have US Food and Drug Administration approval. The completed phase 2 randomized trials in humans of MMP inhibitors have methodologic limitations but generally show no significant benefits with adverse effects. At present, the principal research challenge is to achieve a better understanding of the complexities of biological functions of MMPs and subsequently to conduct large-scale phase 3 trials.
Introduction
The transitory proteolytic breakdown of specific protein components of extracellular matrices (ECMs) is a necessary component of many normal physiological processes, including developmental tissue remodeling, wound healing, and embryo implantation. 1 Conversely, anomalous proteolysis is a pathologic feature of cardiovascular and other inflammatory diseases. 2 Members of the large matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family play major roles in degradation of all matrix proteins. Thus, the use of exogenous inhibitors of specific MMPs has the potential to treat or prevent diseases involving pathologic ECM breakdown. 2
Numerous synthetic MMP inhibitors have been tested in randomized trials, mainly in cancer, and their results have been disappointing. The findings of no significant evidence for benefit have been attributed to deficiencies in specificity, kinetics, and limitations in trial design. 3
In animal, but not human, models of myocardial infarction (MI), inhibition of MMPs by synthetic inhibitors reduces adverse remodeling of the left ventricle (LV). 4 Further, endogenous tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) that regulate the activities of MMPs in vivo, but have been generally dismissed as leads for developing clinical treatments, can be exogenously introduced to reduce adverse post-MI LV remodeling and inflammatory processes. 4,5 In addition, tetracycline, which was initially discovered as an antibacterial agent and used to develop a family of antibiotics and derivatives, also inhibits MMPs. In rodent hearts, doxycycline has a cardioprotective effect during reperfusion mediated by MMP-2 inhibition. 6 In one small phase 2 randomized trial in humans, doxycycline reduces the adverse LV remodeling, infarct size, severity of MI, and LV dysfunction. 7 Doxycycline is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating tissue degradation by MMPs in periodontitis. 8,9 Thus, synthetic MMP inhibitors, TIMPs, and chemically modified tetracyclines (CMTs) are promising but unproven agents to decrease risks of cardiovascular diseases. 10
Basic Research
Matrix Metalloproteinases
The 23 MMPs encoded by the human genome are classified as collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, and membrane-bound MMPs, based on their substrates and structures. 1 Unregulated MMP proteolysis is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular diseases. Specifically, MMPs are prominent players in matrix destruction post-MI, with gelatinases A and B (MMP-2 and MMP-9) playing important roles during the early post-MI period. 2,11 Matrix metalloproteinase 2 is expressed in the heart, but several other MMPs, including MMP-9, are not. These enzymes are produced by inflammatory cells, particularly neutrophils, which migrate into the cardiac matrix post-MI. The ECM that is degraded and remodeled post-MI is composed of type I, III, and IV collagens, fibronectins, laminins, and matricellular proteins including osteonectin, periostin (osteoblast-specific factor 2), and thrombospondin 1. 12 The cardiac ECM is not merely structural but interacts with and influences myocytes and fibroblasts through cell surface integrins. 12 In addition to the breakdown of ECM and other extracellular proteins by secreted MMPs, nonsecreted forms of MMP-2 can target intracellular proteins including sarcomere proteins such as troponin I, myosin light chain 1, α-actinin, and titin causing cellular damage and death. 13
Like other proteases that do not function in digestive processes, active forms of MMPs normally have restricted lifetimes in vivo and their production is firmly regulated at the levels of synthesis, activation, and through inhibition. They are synthesized as inactive precursors, or pro-MMPs, which are activated through proteolytic removal of N-terminal pro-domains; this process can be catalyzed by other proteases, or autolytically, or promoted by chemical modification (oxidation).
Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases
Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1 through 4 are tight-binding, endogenous inhibitors of the MMPs, whereas circulatory MMPs are inhibited by the serum protein, α2-macroglobulin. Like many proteins, TIMPs have an array of additional “moonlighting” functions. For example, TIMP-2 also mediates the activation of pro-MMP-2 in the pericellular environment. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 2 binds to the noncatalytic hemopexin domain of pro-MMP-2 and forms a membrane-anchored complex by also binding to the active site of a molecule of membrane-type MMP-14. The pro-MMP-2 component of this complex is then activated by proteolytic cleavage of the pro-domain by a second MMP-14 molecule. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 4 also binds to pro-MMP-2 through the hemopexin domain, in competition with TIMP-2, but it forms a complex that cannot be activated. Since TIMP-4 is the most abundant TIMP in the heart, pro-MMP-2 activation is normally regulated. 13 Post-MI, however, reperfusion generates reactive oxygen species that activate pro-MMP-2 and others by oxidizing a cysteine in the pro-domain. 14 This process triggers an upsurge in proteolytic activity arising from endogenous cells in the myocardium, together with the inflammatory cells that invade post-MI. 2,15
Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases are also potential therapeutic agents for MMP-related pathologies. 13 As endogenous proteins, TIMPs are verified as in vivo MMP inhibitors. Although they are generally irreversible inhibitors of a broad spectrum of MMPs, they can be engineered to narrow their range of targets. 13 Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 3 inhibits the largest array of MMPs including several proinflammatory molecules such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)-converting enzyme or A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase 17 (ADAM-17) that releases a soluble, active form of the inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α , from a membrane bound precursor. TIMP-3 also inhibits the aggrecanases, A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motifs 4 and 5 (ADAM-TS4 and ADAM-TS5), that initiate the degradation of the proteoglycan, aggrecan, in cartilage. 13 Little free TIMP-3 is present in tissues since it binds tightly to sulfated oligosaccharides in the ECM and is also endocytosed by cells after it has been secreted. 16,17 Hyaluronic acid hydrogel was used to encapsulate recombinant human TIMP-3, to which it binds through electrostatic interactions, allowing slow release in vivo. In pigs, MI was induced by coronary ligation, and the hydrogel/TIMP-3, hydrogel alone, or saline was injected into the MI region in subgroups. During 14 days of observation, both infarct size and LV dilatation were reduced in the TIMP-3-treated pigs that also showed lower levels of inflammatory cytokines and increased smooth muscle actin content relative to the controls. 5 The continuous delivery of TIMP-3 obstructed post-MI remodeling in the animals treated with TIMP-3. Although TIMP-3 was effective at mitigating adverse MI effects in pigs, the fact that TIMP-4 is expressed in a narrow range of organs, and is the predominant TIMP in the heart, directs attention to this inhibitor for the treatment of cardiac disease. In addition, overexpression of human TIMP-4 from an adenoviral construct, or through a cardiac-specific overexpression transgenic construct in post-MI mice, improved LV dilatation as well as ejection fraction and increased fibrillar collagen expression in the MI region, suggesting that exogenous TIMP-4 promotes matrix stabilization. 18
Clinical Research With MMP Inhibitors
In the human heart, exogenous MMP inhibitors have the potential to minimize harmful effects of LV remodeling post-MI. Nonetheless, some MMPs have crucial functions that must be maintained. Thus, any clinical applicability of MMP inhibitors must include selective inhibition of desired targets or localized delivery to a tissue. Multiple synthetic MMP inhibitors have been developed, including some that appeared to be specific in vitro and had efficacy in animal models of various human diseases. When these were tested in randomized trials in humans, none had efficacy and many caused serious adverse events including anemia, musculoskeletal, and liver abnormalities. 19 This may reflect their nonspecific binding to other MMPs and proteins in humans. Specifically 2 types of inhibitors have been tested in humans, each in a phase 2 randomized trial of small sample size of LV remodeling post-MI. Each of these is useful to formulate but not to test the hypothesis of clinical benefits in cardiovascular disease. 20 These inhibitors include PG116800, a hydroxamate inhibitor, and doxycycline (Table 1). 4,21,22 The trial of PG116800 was reported to show no significant evidence of benefit, but the point estimate is compatible with no effect as well as small to moderate benefit or harm. In addition, there may have been inadequate dosing. 4 In contrast, doxycycline significantly reduced the adverse LV remodeling, infarct size, severity of MI, and LV dysfunction. These discrepancies in findings may be real but also may have been due, at least in part, to the size of the samples as well as the lower affinity of doxycycline for MMPs in comparison with most synthetic MMP inhibitors and TIMPs (Ki in the 10−5 mol/L range vs ≤10−9 mol/L). 21,22
Randomized Trials in Humans of MMP Inhibitors and LV Remodeling.
Abbreviations: LV, left ventricle; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase.
Research Challenges in Hypothesis Testing
Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors are a plausible but unproven means to treat various clinical manifestations of cardiovascular diseases. Although TIMPs are tight-binding, essentially irreversible, inhibitors of MMPs that function in vivo and can be engineered to enhance their specificity for desired targets, they are difficult to test clinically because their secondary functions on cell growth and differentiation, cell migration, and angiogenesis raise concerns about serious adverse effects. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases cannot be delivered orally but, when embedded in a matrix, can be delivered locally and released slowly. In addition, doxycycline and other CMTs are broad-spectrum MMP inhibitors that bind reversibly and with lower affinity. They can be taken orally and may be more clinically useful than high-affinity inhibitors that completely block enzyme action. One of the research challenges in testing the hypothesis is the need for rigorous testing and exploration of less conventional approaches. Support for this approach derives from the previously discussed promising results using a modified form of TIMP-3 in an animal model and other clinical studies with the relatively weak inhibitor, doxycycline. The latter may imply that partial, relatively nonspecific inhibition of MMPs may yield more favorable results. 7,23
Conclusions
The completed randomized trials of MMP inhibitors showing no significant benefits have clear limitations in their design features that can be addressed. A greater and more fundamental research challenge is to better understand the biological functions and complexities of MMPs and their natural inhibitors. Such basic research findings may form the basis to conduct large-scale phase 3 randomized trials in humans. At present, the potential clinical and public health impact of MMP inhibition in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases is enormous. Thus, the adequate testing of this important and timely hypothesis will be extremely difficult but requires methodological rigor to be able to conclude whether there are clinical benefits or, to paraphrase Huxley, it is a beautiful hypothesis that is slain by ugly facts. 24
Footnotes
Authors’ Note
M. Lizotte-Waniewski contributed to conception and design; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafted the manuscript; critically revised the manuscript; gave final approval; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. K. Brew contributed to conception and design; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; critically revised the manuscript; gave final approval; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. C. H. Hennekens contributed to conception and design; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; critically revised the manuscript; gave final approval; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
Dr. Lizotte-Waniewski, Professor Brew and Professor Hennekens reported that they are funded by the Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University. Professor Hennekens reported that he serves as an independent scientist in an advisory role to investigators and sponsors as: Chair or Member of Data and Safety Monitoring Boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, British Heart Foundation, Cadila, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, DalCor, Genzyme, Lilly, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sunovion and the Wellcome Foundation; to Aralez/Pozen, the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration, UpToDate, and legal counsel for Pfizer and Takeda; receives royalties for authorship or editorship of 3 textbooks and as coinventor on patents for inflammatory markers and CV disease that are held by Brigham and Women’s Hospital; has an investment management relationship with the West-Bacon Group within SunTrust Investment Services, which has discretionary investment authority and does not own any common or preferred stock in any pharmaceutical or medical device company.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
