Singh BN . Atrial fibrillation following investigation of rhythm management: AFFIRM Trial Outcomes. What might be their implications for arrhythmia control. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Therapeut7(3):131-133, 2002
2.
Tsang TS , Gersh BJ. Atrial fibrillation: An old disease, a new epidemic. Am J Med113:432-435, 2002
3.
Singh BN . Atrial fibrillation: Epidemiologic considerations and rationale for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Therapeut8(1):S13-S26, 2003
4.
The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators . A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med347:185-193, 2002
5.
Hohnloser SH , Kuck KH, Lilienthal J, for the PIAF Investigators. Rhythm versus rate control in atrial fibrillation—a randomized trial. Lancet356:1789-1794, 2002
6.
Van Gelder IC , Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al for the Rate Control versus Electrical Control for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. A comparison of rate control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med347:1834-1840, 2002
7.
Singh BN , Singh SN, Reda DJ. Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med352:1861-1872, 2005
8.
Van Gelder IC , Crijns HJ, Blanksma PK, et al. Time course of hemodynamic changes and improvement of exercise tolerance after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation unassociated with cardiac valve disease. Am J Cardiol72:560-566, 1993
9.
Ueshima K , Myers J, Morris CK, et al. The effect of cardioversion on exercise capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J126:1021-1024, 1993
10.
Singh BN . β-Adrenergic blockers as antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory compounds: An overview. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Therapeut10(2):000-000, 2005