Working memory, the ability to transiently keep, process, and use information as part of ongoing mental processes is an essential feature of cognitive functioning. The largest number of items that people can hold in their working memory, referred to as the capacity of working memory, is limited and varies substantially among individuals. Uncovering the biological factors that underlie these two defining properties of working memory capacity remains a key undertaking of modern cognitive neuroscience since capacity strongly predicts how well we reason, learn, and even do math. In this work we review data that highlights the role white matter, which provides the wiring of the extensive neural networks that activate during working memory tasks, may play in interindividual variations in capacity. We also describe advanced diffusion imaging methods, which may be uniquely suited in capturing those white matter features that are most relevant to capacity. Finally, we discuss several possible mechanisms through which white matter may both contribute to and limit working memory.
AlexanderALLeeJELazarMFieldAS. 2007. Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. Neurotherapeutics4(3):316–29.
2.
AlexanderDCHubbardPLHallMGMooreEAPtitoMParkerGJ, and others. 2010. Orientationally invariant indices of axon diameter and density from diffusion MRI. Neuroimage52(4):1374–89.
3.
AssafYBasserPJ. 2005. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage27(1):48–58.
4.
AssafYBlumenfeld-KatzirTYovelYBasserPJ. 2008. AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med59(6):1347–54.
5.
BasserPJ. 1995. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed8(7-8):333–44.
6.
BasserPJJonesDK. 2002. Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review. NMR Biomed15(7-8):456–67.
7.
BleckleyMKDursoFTCrutchfieldJMEngleRWKhannaMM. 2003. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation. Psychon Bull Rev10(4):884–9.
8.
BuddeMDXieMCrossAHSongSK. 2009. Axial diffusivity is the primary correlate of axonal injury in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis spinal cord: a quantitative pixelwise analysis. J Neurosci29(9):2805–13.
9.
ChangYSOwenJPPojmanNJThieuTBukshpunPWakahiroML, and others. 2015. White matter changes of neurite density and fiber orientation dispersion during human brain maturation. PLoS One10(6):e0123656.
10.
ChechlaczMGillebertCRVangkildeSAPetersenAHumphreysGW. 2015. Structural variability within frontoparietal networks and individual differences in attentional functions: an approach using the theory of visual attention. J Neurosci35(30):10647–58.
11.
ClaydenJDNagyZWeiskopfNAlexanderDCClarkCA. 2015. Microstructural parameter estimation in vivo using diffusion MRI and structured prior information. Magn Reson Med. Epub May20. doi:10.1002/mrm.25723
12.
ConwayARKaneMJEngleRW. 2003. Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci7(12):547–52.
13.
CowanN. 2010. The magical mystery four: how is working memory capacity limited, and why?Curr Dir Psychol Sci19(1):51–7.
14.
DarkiFKlingbergT.2015. The role of fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal networks in the development of working memory: a longitudinal study. Cereb Cortex25(6):1587–95.
15.
DavisSWKragelJEMaddenDJCabezaR.2012. The architecture of cross-hemispheric communication in the aging brain: linking behavior to functional and structural connectivity. Cereb Cortex22(1):232–42.
16.
De SantisSAssafYJonesDK. 2012. Using the biophysical CHARMED model to elucidate the underpinnings of contrast in diffusional kurtosis analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI. MAGMA25(4):267–76.
17.
Dell’AcquaFSimmonsAWilliamsSCCataniM.2013. Can spherical deconvolution provide more information than fiber orientations? Hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy, a true-tract specific index to characterize white matter diffusion. Hum Brain Mapp34(10):2464–83.
18.
DickASBernalBTremblayP.2014. The language connectome: new pathways, new concepts. Neuroscientist20(5):453–67.
19.
EngleRWCantorJCarulloJJ. 1992. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn18(5):972–92.
20.
ErikssonJVogelEKLansnerABergstromFNybergL.2015. Neurocognitive architecture of working memory. Neuron88(1):33–46.
21.
EspesethTVangkildeSAPetersenADyrholmMWestlyeLT.2014. TVA-based assessment of attentional capacities-associations with age and indices of brain white matter microstructure. Front Psychol5:1177.
22.
FieldsRDWooDHBasserPJ. 2015. Glial regulation of the neuronal connectome through local and long-distant communication. Neuron86(2):374–86.
23.
FieremansEJensenJHHelpernJA. 2011. White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage58(1):177–88.
24.
GolestaniAMMilesLBabbJCastellanosFXMalaspinaDLazarM.2014. Constrained by our connections: white matter’s key role in interindividual variability in visual working memory capacity. J Neurosci34(45):14913–8.
25.
HaleSMyersonJEmeryLSLawrenceBMDufaultC.2007. Variation in working memory across the life span. In: ConwayARJaredCKaneMJMiyakeMJTowseJN, editors. Variation in working memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p 194–224.
26.
HuangSYNummenmaaAWitzelTDuvalTCohen-AdadJWaldLL, and others. 2015. The impact of gradient strength on in vivo diffusion MRI estimates of axon diameter. Neuroimage106:464–72.
27.
HuiESRussell GlennGHelpernJAJensenJH. 2015. Kurtosis analysis of neural diffusion organization. Neuroimage106:391–403.
28.
JelescuIOVeraartJAdisetiyoVMillaSSNovikovDSFieremansE.2015. One diffusion acquisition and different white matter models: how does microstructure change in human early development based on WMTI and NODDI? Neuroimage107:242–56.
29.
JensenJHHelpernJARamaniALuHKaczynskiK.2005. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med53(6):1432–40.
30.
JohnsonMKMcMahonRPRobinsonBMHarveyANHahnBLeonardCJ, and others. 2013. The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia. Neuropsychology27(2):220–9.
31.
KaneMJEngleRW. 2003. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen132(1):47–70.
32.
KlingbergT. 2006. Development of a superior frontal-intraparietal network for visuo-spatial working memory. Neuropsychologia44(11):2171–7.
33.
LazarM. 2010. Mapping brain anatomical connectivity using white matter tractography. NMR Biomed23(7):821–35.
34.
LismanJEIdiartMA. 1995. Storage of 7 +/− 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles. Science267(5203):1512–5.
35.
LuckSJVogelEK. 2013. Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends Cogn Sci17(8):391–400.
36.
MaroisR. 2015. The brain mechanisms of working memory: an evolving story. In: JolicoeurPLefebvreCMartinez-TrujilloJ, editors. Mechanisms of sensory working memory: attention and perfomanceXXV. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. p 23–31.
37.
MillerEKBuschmanTJ. 2015. Working memory capacity: limits on the bandwidth of cognition. Daedalus144(1):112–22.
38.
PajevicSBasserPJFieldsRD. 2014. Role of myelin plasticity in oscillations and synchrony of neuronal activity. Neuroscience276:135–47.
39.
PergeJANivenJEMugnainiEBalasubramanianVSterlingP.2012. Why do axons differ in caliber?J Neurosci32(2):626–38.
40.
PetersBDIkutaTDeRossePJohnMBurdickKEGrunerP, and others. 2014. Age-related differences in white matter tract microstructure are associated with cognitive performance from childhood to adulthood. Biol Psychiatry75(3):248–56.
41.
PostleBR. 2015. Neural bases of the short-term retention of visual information. In: JolicoeurPLefebvreCMartinez-TrujilloJ, editors. Mechanisms of sensory working memory: attention and perfomanceXXV. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. p43–58.
42.
SalthouseTA. 2011. Neuroanatomical substrates of age-related cognitive decline. Psychol Bull137(5):753–84.
43.
SepehrbandFClarkKAUllmannJFKurniawanNDLeanageGReutensDC and others. 2015. Brain tissue compartment density estimated using diffusion-weighted MRI yields tissue parameters consistent with histology. Hum Brain Mapp36(9):3687–702.
44.
ShipsteadZHarrisonTLEngleRW. 2015. Working memory capacity and the scope and control of attention. Atten Percept Psychophys77(6):1863–80.
45.
SongSKSunSWRamsbottomMJChangCRussellJCrossAH. 2002. Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage17(3):1429–36.
46.
StikovNCampbellJSStrohTLaveleeMFreySNovekJ, and others. 2015. In vivo histology of the myelin g-ratio with magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage118:397–405.
47.
SykováENicholsonC.2008. Diffusion in brain extracellular space. Physiol Rev88(4):1277–340.
48.
TakeuchiHTakiYSassaYHashizumeHSekiguchiAFukushimaA, and others. 2011. Verbal working memory performance correlates with regional white matter structures in the frontoparietal regions. Neuropsychologia49(12):3466–73.
49.
TamnesCKFjellAMOstbyYWestlyeLTDue-TonnessenPBjornerudA, and others. 2011. The brain dynamics of intellectual development: waxing and waning white and gray matter. Neuropsychologia49(13):3605–11.
50.
ToddJJMaroisR.2004. Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature428(6984):751–4.
51.
TournierJDCalamanteFGadianDGConnellyA.2004. Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage23(3):1176–85.
52.
TuholskiSWEngleRWBaylisGC. 2001. Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration. Mem Cognit29(3):484–92.
53.
UnsworthNEngleRW. 2005. Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: evidence from the serial reaction time task. Mem Cognit33(2):213–20.
54.
VogelEKMachizawaMG. 2004. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature428(6984):748–51.
55.
WangYSunPWangQTrinkausKSchmidtRENaismithRT, and others. 2015. Differentiation and quantification of inflammation, demyelination and axon injury or loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain138(Pt 5):1223–38.
56.
WangYWangQHaldarJPYehFCXieMSunP, and others. 2011. Quantification of increased cellularity during inflammatory demyelination. Brain134(Pt 12):3590–601.
57.
WedeenVJHagmannPTsengWYReeseTGWeisskoffRM. 2005. Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med54(6):1377–86.
58.
ZhangHSchneiderTWheeler-KingshottCAAlexanderDC. 2012. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage61(4):1000–16.
