ClarkR.A.. Breast cancer screening: is it worthwhile?Cancer Control: JMCC.1995; 2: 189–194.
2.
SäbelM., AichingerH.. Recent developments in breast imaging.Phys Med Biol.1996; 41: 315–368.
3.
HendeeW.R.. History and status of x-ray mammography.Health Phys.1995; 69: 636–648.
4.
FeigS.A., YaffeM.J.. Current status of digital mammography.Semin Ultrasound CT MR.1996; 17: 424–443.
5.
SchmidtR.A., NishikawaR.M.. Clinical use of digital mammography: the present and the prospects.J Digit Imaging.1995; 8: 74–79.
6.
NewsteadG.M., WeinrebJ.C.. Critical pathways for the future: MR imaging and digital mammography.Radiographics.1995; 15: 951–962.
7.
HoggeJ.P., ArtzD.S., FreedmanM.T.. Update in digital mammography.Crit Rev Diagn Imaging.1997; 38: 89–113.
8.
YaffeM.J.. Digital mammography. In: HausA., YaffeM.J., eds. Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Physics: Technical Aspects of Breast Imaging.Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America;1992: 245–255.
9.
CheungL., CoeR.. Full-field, single exposure digital mammography.Med Electronics.1995; October: 50–57.
10.
WilliamsM.B., FajardoL.L.. Digital mammography: performance considerations and current detector designs.Acad Radiol.1996; 3: 429–437.
11.
WagnerA.J.. Contrast and grid performance in mammography. In: BarnesG.T., FreyG.D., eds. Screen Film Mammography - Imaging Considerations and Medical Physics Responsibilities.Madison, Wisc: Medical Physics Publishing;1991: 115–134.
12.
NishikawaR.M., MawdsleyG.E., FensterA.. Scanned-projection digital mammography.Med Phys.1987; 14: 717–727.
13.
YaffeM.J., NishikawaR.M.. X-ray imaging concepts: noise, SNR, and DQE. In: SeibertJ.A., BarnesG.T., GouldR.B., eds Specification, Acceptance Testing, and Quality Control of Diagnostic X-ray Imaging Equipment.American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Medical Physics Monograph No. 20: 1994; 109–144.
14.
AntonukL.E., YorkstonJ., HuangW.. A real-time, flat-panel, amorphous silicon, digital x-ray imager.Radiographics.1995; 15: 993–1000.
15.
ZhaoW., RowlandsJ.A.. X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology.Med Phys.1995; 22: 1595–1604.
16.
HausA.G., GrayJ.E., DalyT.R.. Evaluation of mammographic viewbox luminance, illuminance, and color.Med Phys.1993; 20: 819–821.
17.
MukaE., BlumeH., DalyS.. Display of medical images on CRT soft-copy displays: a tutorial.SPIE. 1995; 2431; 341–359.
18.
WeibrechtM., SpekowiusG., QuadfliegP.. Image quality assessment of monochrome monitors for medical soft copy display.SPIE. 1997; 3031; 232–244.
19.
GohelH.J., KallergiM., VossbergM.. A workstation interface for ROC studies in digital mammography.SPIE. 1997; 3031; 440–447.
20.
CoxG.G., TempletonA.W., DwyerSJIII. Digital image management: networking, display and archiving.Radiol Clin North Am.1986; 24: 37–54.
21.
KallergiM., GavrielidesM.A., GrossW.W.. Evaluation of a CCD-based film digitizer for digital mammography.SPIE. 1997; 3032; 282–291.
22.
RoehrigH., YuT., KrupinskiE.. Image quality control for digital mammographic systems: initial experience and outlook.J Digit Imaging.1995; 8: 52–66.
23.
BarnesG.T., FajardoL.L.. Cost of digital mammography. InfoRAD exhibit 9420 CAD.Proc Radiol Soc North Am.1996; 201(P): 557.
24.
FeigS.A., YaffeM.J.. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.Radiol Clin North Am.1995; 33: 1205–1230.
25.
QianW., ClarkeL.P., ZhengB.. Computer assisted diagnosis for digital mammography.IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag.1995; 14: 561–569.
26.
QianW., KallergiM., ClarkeL.P.. Tree structured wavelet transform segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammography.Med Phys.1995; 22: 1247–1254.
27.
DoiK., GigerM.L., NishikawaR.M.. Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis.J Digit Imaging.1995; 8: 2–7.
28.
KopansD.B.. Accuracy of mammographic interpretation.N Engl J Med.1994; 331: 1521–1522.
29.
ClarkR.A., NemecL., LoveN.. Breast imaging: a practical look at its capabilities and its limitations.Postgrad Med.1992; 92: 117–134.