Quality Control of Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fletcher

S.W.

, Black

, Harris

Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 1644–1656.

Kerlikowske

, Grady

, Rubin

S.M.

Efficacy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995; 273: 149–154.

Elmore

J.G.

, Wells

C.K.

, Lee

C.H.

Variability in radiologistsí interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 1493–1499.

Spring

D.B.

, Kimbrell-Wilmot

Evaluating the success of mammography at the local level: how to conduct an audit of your practice. Radiol Clin North Am. 1987; 25: 983–992.

Murphy

W.A.

Jr , Destouet

J.M.

, Monsees

B.S.

Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. Radiology. 1990; 175: 319–320.

Sickles

E.A.

Quality assurance: how to audit your own mammography practice. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992; 30: 265–275.

Brenner

R.J.

, Sickles

E.A.

Acceptability of periodic follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for mammographically detected lesions interpreted as probably benign. Radiology. 1989; 171: 645–646.

Helvie

M.A.

, Pennes

D.R.

, Rebner

Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. Radiology. 1991; 178: 155–158.

Sickles

E.A.

Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology. 1991; 179: 463–468.

10.

Varas

, Leborgne

J.H.

Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184: 409–414.