DuffyS.W., TabarL., VitakB., WarwickJ.. Tumor size and breast cancer detection: what might be the effect of a less sensitive screening tool than mammography?Breast J.2006; 12(Suppl 1): S91–S95.
2.
MillerA.B., WallC., BainesC.J.. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.BMJ.2014; 348: g366.
3.
TabárL., VitakB., ChenT.H.. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.Radiology.2011; 260(3): 658–663.
4.
HellquistB.N., DuffyS.W., AbdsalehS.. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort.Cancer.2011; 117(4): 714–722.
5.
KoscielnyS., TubianaM., LêMG. Breast cancer: relationship between the size of the primary tumour and the probability of metastatic dissemination.Br J Cancer.1984; 49(6): 709–715.
6.
American Cancer Society.Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2013-2014.Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.2013.
7.
BakerL.H.. Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.CA Cancer J Clin.1982; 32(4): 194–225.
8.
YaffeM.J.. Correction: Canada study [letter].J Natl Cancer Inst.1993; 85: 94.
9.
MathisK.L., HoskinT.L., BougheyJ.C.. Palpable presentation of breast cancer persists in the era of screening mammography.J Am Coll Surg.2010; 210(3): 314–318.
10.
GüthU., HuangD.J., HuberM.. Tumor size and detection in breast cancer: Self-examination and clinical breast examination are at their limit.Cancer Detect Prev.2008; 32(3): 224–228.
TaroneR.E.. The excess of patients with advanced breast cancer in young women screened with mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.Cancer.1995; 75(4): 997–1003.
