Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant primary neoplasm of bone. Orthopedic procedures are essential components in the multidisciplinary treatment of osteosarcoma. Limb-salvaging procedures offer adequate disease control comparable to the results obtained by amputations. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the various types of amputations and the limb-salvaging techniques for the treatment of osteosarcoma.
Methods
The authors analyzed the characteristics of limb-salvaging procedures and amputations for osteosarcoma. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in the English language that are listed in the National Library of Medicine were used as the basis for this review. In addition, a review of an expandable prosthesis is included.
Results
Limb-salvaging techniques have acceptable rates of disease control. However, amputation remains a valid procedure in selected cases of osteosarcoma in most parts of the world. Orthopedic oncology surgeons have various materials, procedures, and techniques available to achieve disease control and improve function in patients with osteosarcoma.
Conclusions
The surgical management of patients with osteosarcoma is challenging. No difference in survival has been shown between amputations and adequately performed limb-salvaging procedures. Optimal tumor resection and a functional residual limb with increased patient survival are the goals of modern orthopedic oncology.
CortesE.P., HollandJ.F., WangJ.J.. The Classic: amputation and adriamycin in primary osteosarcoma. 1974.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2005; 438: 5–8.
4.
MankinH.J., HornicekF.J., RosenbergA.E.. Survival data for 648 patients with osteosarcoma treated at one institution.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2004: 286–291.
5.
EbeidW., AminS., AbdelmegidA.. Limb salvage management of pathologic fractures of primary malignant bone tumors.Cancer Control.2005; 12: 57–61.
6.
LewisV.O.. What's new in musculoskeletal oncology.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2007; 89: 1399–1407.
7.
BabinS.R., SimonP., Babin-BoilletotA.. Can amputation be avoided in local recurrence after limb salvage for high grade osteosarcoma? A case report and a review of the literature.Int Orthop.1995; 19: 374–376.
8.
BacciG., FerrariS., LariS.. Osteosarcoma of the limb: amputation or limb salvage in patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2002; 84: 88–92.
9.
BonvalotS., LaplancheA., LejeuneF.. Limb salvage with isolated perfusion for soft tissue sarcoma: could less TNF-alpha be better?Ann Oncol.2005; 16: 1061–1068. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
10.
LetsonG.D.. Diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.Cancer Control.1994; 1: 566–567.
11.
LetsonG.D.. Issues in the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas.Cancer Control.2001; 8: 215–216.
12.
Lev-CheloucheD., Abu-AbeidS., KollanderY.. Multifocal soft tissue sarcoma: limb salvage following hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with high-dose tumor necrosis factor and melphalan.J Surg Oncol.1999; 70: 185–189.
13.
OgiharaY., SudoA., FujinamiS.. Limb salvage for bone sarcoma of the proximal tibia.Int Orthop.1991; 15: 377–379.
14.
JaffeN., CarrascoH., RaymondK.. Can cure in patients with osteosarcoma be achieved exclusively with chemotherapy and abrogation of surgery?Cancer.2002; 95: 2202–2210.
15.
FriedmanM.A., CarterS.K.. The therapy of osteogenic sarcoma: current status and thoughts for the future.J Surg Oncol.1972; 4: 482–510.
16.
NeelM.D., LetsonG.D.. Modular endoprostheses for children with malignant bone tumors.Cancer Control.2001; 8: 344–348.
17.
GodalT.. World Health Organization and health problem in developing countries.Do we have something to learn? [In Norwegian.] Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen.1980; 100: 420–422.
18.
NgomaT.. World Health Organization cancer priorities in developing countries.Ann Oncol.2006; 17(Suppl 8): viii9–viii14.
19.
KagenL.B.. Use of denial in adolescents with bone cancer.Health Soc Work.1976; 1: 70–87.
20.
Felder-PuigR., FormannA.K., MildnerA.. Quality of life and psychosocial adjustment of young patients after treatment of bone cancer.Cancer.1998; 83: 69–75.
21.
NicholsonH.S., MulvihillJ.J.. Late effects of therapy in survivors of childhood and adolescent osteosarcoma.Cancer Treat Res.1993; 62: 45–48.
22.
AgarwalM., AnchanC., ShahM.. Limb salvage surgery for osteosarcoma: effective low-cost treatment.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2007; 459: 82–91.
23.
DillinghamT.R., PezzinL.E., MacKenzieE.J.. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States.South Med J.2002; 95: 875–883.
24.
BielackS.S., Kempf-BielackB., DellingG.. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group protocols.J Clin Oncol.2002; 20: 776–790.
25.
SimonM.A., AschlimanM.A., ThomasN.. Limb-salvage treatment versus amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. 1986.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2005; 87: 2822.
26.
PerryJ.. Below-the-knee compared with above-the-knee amputation.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2005; 87: 1162–1163; author reply 1163.
27.
OtisJ.C., LaneJ.M., KrollM.A.. Energy cost during gait in osteosarcoma patients after resection and knee replacement and after above-the-knee amputation.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1985; 67: 606–611.
28.
MontM.A., UrquhartM.A., HungerfordD.S.. Intramedullary goniometer can improve alignment in knee arthroplasty surgery.J Arthroplasty.1997; 12: 332–336.
29.
BenjaminJ.. Component alignment in total knee arthroplasty.Instr Course Lect.2006; 55: 405–412.
30.
PaleyD., TetsworthK.. Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of multiapical frontal plane angular and bowing deformities of the femur and tibia.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1992; 280: 65–71.
31.
TaylorS.M., KalbaughC.A., BlackhurstD.W.. Preoperative clinical factors predict postoperative functional outcomes after major lower limb amputation: an analysis of 553 consecutive patients.J Vasc Surg.2005; 42: 227–235.
32.
RizzoR.L., MatsumotoT.. Above vs. below knee amputations: a retrospective analysis.Int Surg.1980; 65: 265–267.
33.
Van NesC.P.. Rotation-plasty for congenital defects of the femur: making use of the shortened limb to control the knee joint of a prosthesis.J Bone Joint Surg.1950; 32B: 12–16.
34.
BetsyM., CapozziJ.D., RhodesR.. The human form: accepting the prioritization of patient values.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2005; 87: 1653–1655.
35.
LindnerN.J., RammO., HillmannA.. Limb salvage and outcome of osteosarcoma. The University of Muenster experience.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1999; 358: 83–89.
36.
CampanacciM., LausM.. Local recurrence after amputation for osteosarcoma.J Bone Joint Surg Br.1980; 62-B: 201–207.
37.
GherlinzoniF., PicciP., BacciG.. Limb sparing versus amputation in osteosarcoma. Correlation between local control, surgical margins and tumor necrosis: Istituto Rizzoli experience.Ann Oncol.1992; 3(Suppl 2): S23–S27.
38.
WolfR.E., EnnekingW.F.. The staging and surgery of musculoskeletal neoplasms.Orthop Clin North Am.1996; 27: 473–481.
39.
VirkusW.W., MarshallD., EnnekingW.F.. The effect of contaminated surgical margins revisited.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2002; 397: 89–94.
40.
EnnekingW.F., MaaleG.E.. The effect of inadvertent tumor contamination of wounds during the surgical resection of musculoskeletal neoplasms.Cancer.1988; 62: 1251–1256.
41.
EnnekingW.F., ShirleyP.D.. Resection-arthrodesis for malignant and potentially malignant lesions about the knee using an intramedullary rod and local bone grafts.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1977; 59: 223–236.
GebhardtM.C., FlugstadD.I., SpringfieldD.S.. The use of bone allografts for limb salvage in high-grade extremity osteosarcoma.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1991; 270: 181–196.
44.
SimF.H., FrassicaF.J.. Use of allografts following resection of tumors of the musculoskeletal system.Instr Course Lect.1993; 42: 405–413.
45.
WeinbergH., KenanS., LewisM.M.. The role of microvascular surgery in limb-sparing procedures for malignant tumors of the knee.Plast Reconstr Surg.1993; 92: 692–698.
46.
ClohisyD.R., MankinH.J.. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction after resection of a musculoskeletal tumor in the proximal end of the tibia.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1994; 76: 549–554.
47.
MankinH.J., DoppeltS.H., SullivanT.R.. Osteoarticular and intercalary allograft transplantation in the management of malignant tumors of bone.Cancer.1982; 50: 613–630.
48.
BradishC.F., KempH.B., ScalesJ.T.. Distal femoral replacement by custom-made prostheses. Clinical follow-up and survivorship analysis.J Bone Joint Surg Br.1987; 69: 276–284.
49.
ChoongP.F., SimF.H., PritchardD.J.. Megaprostheses after resection of distal femoral tumors. A rotating hinge design in 30 patients followed for 2-7 years.Acta Orthop Scand.1996; 67: 345–351.
50.
KawaiA., MuschlerG.F., LaneJ.M.. Prosthetic knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur. Medium to long-term results.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1998; 80: 636–647.
51.
KhattakM.J., UmerM., Haroon-ur-Rasheed. Autoclaved tumor bone for reconstruction: an alternative in developing countries.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2006; 447: 138–144.
52.
GermainM.A., DuboussetJ., MascardE.. Vascularized peroneal reconstruction after bloc resection of tumors or congenital malformations of the upper limb in children.Bull Acad Natl Med.2000; 184: 1671–1684; discussion 1685-1686.
53.
LeeS.H., KimH.S., ParkY.B.. Prosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the distal tibia and fibula.J Bone Joint Surg Br.1999; 81: 803–807.
54.
HornicekF.J., GebhardtM.C., TomfordW.W.. Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft-host junction.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2001: 87–98.
55.
MinamiA., UsuiM., OginoT.. Simultaneous reconstruction of bone and skin defects by free fibular graft with a skin flap.Microsurgery.1986; 7: 38–45.
56.
CapannaR., van HornJ.R., BiaginiR.. Reconstruction after resection of the distal fibula for bone tumor.Acta Orthop Scand.1986; 57: 290–294.
57.
FaridY., LinP.P., LewisV.O.. Endoprosthetic and allograft-pros-thetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2006; 442: 223–229.
58.
MontM.A., JonesL.C., SeylerT.M.. New treatment approaches for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: an overview.Instr Course Lect.2007; 56: 197–212.
59.
ReachJ.S.Jr, DickeyI.D., ZobitzM.E.. Direct tendon attachment and healing to porous tantalum: an experimental animal study.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2007; 89: 1000–1009.
60.
KneislJ.S., FinnH.A., SimonM.A.. Mobile knee reconstructions after resection of malignant tumors of the distal femur.Orthop Clin North Am.1991; 22: 105–119.
61.
WilkinsR.M., SoubeiranA.. The Phenix expandable prosthesis: early American experience.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2001: 51–58.
62.
GuptaA., MeswaniaJ., PollockR.. Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2006; 88: 649–654.
63.
GuptaA., MeswaniaJ., BlunnG.. Stanmore noninvasive growing arthrodesis endoprosthesis in the reconstruction of complicated total knee arthroplasty: a case report.Knee.2006; 13: 247–251. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
