KelahanA.M., CatalanoR., MarinucciD.The history, structure, and achievements of the cancer cooperative groups. Managed Care Cancer.2001: 28–33. Available at http://www.cancernetwork.com/. Accessed October 20, 2003.
2.
WittesR.E., FriedmanM.A.Accrual to clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst.1988; 80: 884–885.
3.
GelberR.D., GoldhirschA.Can a clinical trial be the treatment of choice for patients with cancer?J Natl Cancer Inst.1988; 80: 886–887.
4.
LaraP.N.Jr, HigdonR., LimN.Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol.2001; 19: 1728–1733.
CochraneA.L.Archie Cochrane in his own words: selections arranged from his 1972 introduction to “Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on the Health Services”1972. Control Clin Trials.1989; 10: 428–433.
7.
KaluzneyA., BrawleyO., Garson-AngertD.Assuring access to state-of-the-art care for U.S. minority populations: the first 2 years of the minority-based Community Clinical Oncology Program. J Natl Cancer Inst.1993; 85: 1945–1950.
8.
HunterC.P., FrelickR.W., FeldmanA.R.Selection factors in clinical trials: results from the Community Clinical Oncology Program Physician's Patient Log. Cancer Treat Rep.1987; 71: 559–565.
9.
BeggC.B.Cancer clinical trials in the USA: patient eligibility, generalizability of results and technology transfer. Bull Cancer.1987; 74: 197–203.
10.
McCaskill-StevensW., PintoH., MarcusA.C.Recruiting minority cancer patients into cancer clinical trials: a pilot project involving the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the National Medical Association. J Clin Oncol.1999; 17: 1029–1039.
11.
ByarD.P.Why data bases should not replace randomized clinical trials. Biometrics.1980; 36: 337–342.
12.
MiccioloR., ValagussaP., MarubiniE.The use of historical controls in breast cancer: an assessment in three consecutive trials. Control Clin Trials.1985; 6: 259–270.
13.
DupontW.D.Randomized vs historical clinical trials: are the benefits worth the costs?Am J Epidemiol.1985; 122: 940–946.
14.
StillerC.A.Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival. Br J Cancer.1994; 70: 352–362.
15.
RiesL.A.G., EisnerM.P., KosaryC.L., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000.Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2000. Accessed October 28, 2003.
16.
LukensJ.N.Progress resulting from clinical trials: solid tumors in childhood cancer. Cancer.1994; 74: 2710–2718.
17.
RossJ.A., SeversonR.K., PollockB.H.Childhood cancer in the United States: a geographical analysis of cases from the Pediatric Cooperative Clinical Trials groups. Cancer.1996; 77: 201–207.
18.
AndersonB.D., SmithM.A., ReamanG.H.Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst.2003; 95: 630–631.
19.
FisherB., JeongJ.H., AndersonS.Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med.2002; 347: 567–575.
20.
FisherB., AndersonS., BryantJ.Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med.2002; 347: 1233–1241.
21.
FisherB.From Halsted to prevention and beyond: advances in the management of breast cancer during the twentieth century. Eur J Cancer.1999; 35: 1963–1973.
22.
GoldhirschA., GlickJ.H., GelberR.D.Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol.2001; 19: 3817–3827.
23.
MoertelC.G.Accomplishments in surgical adjuvant therapy for large bowel cancer. Cancer.1992; 70: 1364–1371.
24.
WhitneyC.W., SauseW., BundyB.N.Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol.1999; 17: 1339–1348.
25.
MorrisM., EifelP.J., LuJ.Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med.1999; 340: 1137–1143.
26.
KeysH.M., BundyB.N., StehmanF.B.Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med.1999; 340: 1154–1161.
27.
RoseP.G., BundyB.N., WatkinsE.B.Concurrent cisplatinbased radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med.1999; 340: 1144–1153.
28.
PetersWAIII, LiuP.Y., BarrettRJII. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol.2000; 18: 1606–1613.
McGuireW.P., HoskinsW.J., BradyM.F.Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med.1996; 334: 1–6.
31.
PiccartM.J., BertelsenK., JamesK.Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst.2000; 92: 699–708.
32.
KirkwoodJ.M., StrawdermanM.H., ErnstoffM.S.Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684. J Clin Oncol.1996; 14: 7–17.
33.
KirkwoodJ.M., IbrahimJ.G., SondakV.K.High- and low-dose interferon alfa-2b in high-risk melanoma: first analysis of intergroup trial E1690/S9111/C9190. J Clin Oncol.2000; 18: 2444–2458.
34.
KirkwoodJ.M., IbrahimJ.G., SosmanJ.A.High-dose interferon alfa-2b significantly prolongs relapse-free and overall survival compared with the GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccine in patients with resected stage IIB-III melanoma: results of intergroup trial E1694/S9512/C509801. J Clin Oncol.2001; 19: 2370–2380.
35.
FisherB., CostantinoJ.P., WickerhamD.L.Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst.1998; 90: 1371–1388.
36.
ThompsonI.M., GoodmanP.J., TangenC.M.The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med.2003; 349: 215–224.
37.
SandlerR.S., HalabiS., BaronJ.A.A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med.2003; 348: 883–90. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1939.
38.
RothenbergM.L., MeropolN.J., PoplinE.A.Mortality associated with irinotecan plus bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin: summary findings of an independent panel. J Clin Oncol.2001; 19: 3801–3807.
39.
SargentD.J., GoldbergR.M., MahoneyM.R.Rapid reporting and review of an increased incidence of a known adverse event. J Natl Cancer Inst.2000; 92: 1011–1013.
40.
PetersW.P., RosnerG., VredenburghJ.Updated results of a prospective, randomized comparison of two doses of combination alkyating agents (AA) as consolidation after CAF in high-risk primary breast cancer involving ten or more axillary lymph nodes (LN): CALGB 9082/SWOG 9114/NCIC Ma-13. Proc Annu Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol.2001; 20: 81. Abstract.
41.
TallmanM.S., GrayR., RobertN.J.Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in high-risk breast cancer. N Engl J Med.2003; 349: 17–26.
42.
National Library of Medicine. Medical subject headings. Available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/. Accessed October 28, 2003.
43.
LeeS.J., EarleC.C., WeeksJ.C.Outcomes research in oncology: history, conceptual framework, and trends in the literature. J Natl Cancer Inst.2000; 92: 195–204.
44.
GotayC.C., MoinpourC.M., Moody-ThomasS.Behavioral science research in the cooperative group setting: the Southwest Oncology Group Experience. J Natl Cancer Inst.2000; 92: 1381–1387.
45.
BennettC.L., GolubR., WatersT.M.Economic analysis of phase III cooperative group trials: are they feasible?Cancer Invest.1997; 15: 227–236.
46.
Integrating economic analysis into cancer clinical trials: the National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Economics Workbook.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr.1998; 24: 1–28.
47.
SchulmanK.A., YabroffK.R.Measuring the cost-effectiveness of cancer care. Oncology (Huntingt).1995; 9: 523–538.
48.
Rubio-TerresC., TisaireJ.L., KobinaS.Cost-minimisation analysis of three regimens of chemotherapy (docetaxel-cisplatin, paclitaxel-cisplatin, paclitaxel-carboplatin) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer.2002; 35: 81–89.
49.
KonskiA., BracyP., WeissS.Cost-utility analysis of a malignant glioma protocol. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1997; 39: 575–578.
50.
OwenJ.B., GrigsbyP.W., CaldwellT.M.Can costs be measured and predicted by modeling within a cooperative clinical trial group? Economic methodologic pilot studies of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies 90-03 and 91-04. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2001; 49: 633–639.
51.
ComisR.L.The cooperative groups: past and future. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol.1998; 42: 585–587.
52.
CellaD.F., OravE.J., KornblithA.B.Socioeconomic status and cancer survival. J Clin Oncol.1991; 9: 1500–1509.
53.
ModianoM.R., Villar-WerstlerP., CrowleyJ.Evaluation of race as a prognostic factor in multiple myeloma: an ancillary of Southwest Oncology Group Study 8229. J Clin Oncol.1996; 14: 974–977.
54.
RoachMIII, CirrincioneC., BudmanD.Race and survival from breast cancer: based on Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 8541. Cancer J Sci Am.1997; 3: 107–112.
55.
DignamJ.J., ColangeloL., TianW.Outcomes among African-Americans and Caucasians in colon cancer adjuvant therapy trials: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. J Natl Cancer Inst.1999; 91: 1933–1940.
56.
YancikR., RiesL.A.Aging and cancer in America: demographic and epidemiologic perspectives. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am.2000; 14: 17–23.
57.
BalducciL., ExtermannM.Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach. Oncologist.2000; 5: 224–237.
58.
BeggC.B., CarboneP.P.Clinical trials and drug toxicity in the elderly: the experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer.1983; 52: 1986–1992.
59.
DixonD.O., NeilanB., JonesS.E.Effect of age on therapeutic outcome in advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma: the Southwest Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol.1986; 4: 295–305.
60.
SargentD.J., GoldbergR.M., JacobsonS.D.A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. N Engl J Med.2001; 345: 1091–1097.
61.
LangerC.J., ManolaJ., BernardoP.Cisplatin-based therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: implications of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 5592, a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst.2002; 94: 173–181.
62.
Rocha LimaC.M., HerndonJEII, KostyM.Therapy choices among older patients with lung carcinoma: an evaluation of two trials of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Cancer.2002; 94: 181–187.
SchilskyR.L., DresslerL.M., BucciD.Cooperative group tissue banks as research resources: the cancer and leukemia group B tissue repositories. Clin Cancer Res.2002; 8: 943–948.
65.
ParmarM.K., UngerleiderR.S., SimonR.Assessing whether to perform a confirmatory randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst.1996; 88: 1645–1651.
66.
BerryD.A.When is a confirmatory randomized clinical trial needed?J Natl Cancer Inst.1996; 88: 1606–1607.
67.
RocketteH.E., RedmondC.K.Limitations and advantages of meta-analysis in clinical trials. Recent Results Cancer Res.1988; 111: 99–104.
68.
PignonJ.P., HillC.Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in oncology. Lancet Oncol.2001; 2: 475–482.
69.
EifelP., AxelsonJ.A., CostaJ.National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer, November 1-3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst.2001; 93: 979–989.
70.
KosecoffJ., KanouseD.E., RogersW.H.Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA.1987; 258: 2708–2713.
71.
RuschV.W.Surgeons: a future role in clinical trials?Oncologist.1997; 2: V–VI.
72.
StocchiL., NelsonH., SargentD.J.Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report. J Clin Oncol.2001; 19: 3895–3902.
73.
HaaseG.M.The implications of surgical quality assurance in cancer clinical trials. Cancer.1994; 74: 2630–2637.
74.
MandelblattJ.S., YabroffK.R., KernerJ.F.Equitable access to cancer services: a review of barriers to quality care. Cancer.1999; 86: 2378–2390.
75.
PaikS.Incorporating genomics into the cancer clinical trial process. Semin Oncol.2001; 28: 305–309.
76.
DignamJ.J., BryantJ., PaikS.Statistical considerations in assessing molecular markers of cancer prognosis and treatment efficacy. In: LooneyS.W., ed. Biostatistical Methods.Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2002.
77.
TejedaH.A., GreenS.B., TrimbleE.L.Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and Whites in National Cancer Institute cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst.1996; 88: 812–816.
78.
BleyerW.A., TejedaH.A., MurphyS.B.Equal participation of minority patients in US national pediatric cancer clinical trials. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol.1997; 19: 423–427.
79.
MoinpourC.M., AtkinsonJ.O., ThomasS.M.Minority recruitment in the prostate cancer prevention trial. Ann Epidemiol.2000; 10: S85–S91.
80.
EllisP.M., ButowP.N., TattersallM.H.Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. J Clin Oncol.2001; 19: 3554–3561.