SattlerF.R., FoderaroJ.B., AberR.C.. Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia associated with vascular catheters: an important cause of febrile morbidity in hospitalized patients.Infect Control.1984; 5: 279–283.
4.
RaadI., DavisS., KhanA.. Impact of central venous catheter removal on the recurrence of catheter-related coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.1992; 13: 215–221.
5.
RabinovichS., SmithI.M., JanuaryL.E.. The changing patterns of bacterial endocarditis.Med Clin North Am.1968; 52: 1091–1101.
6.
LernerP.I., WeinsteinL.. Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era.N Engl J Med.1966; 274: 388–393.
7.
MylotteJ.M., McDermottC., SpoonerJ.A.. Prospective study of 114 consecutive episodes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Rev Infect Dis.1987; 9: 891–907.
IanniniP.B., CrossleyK.. Therapy of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia associated with a removable focus of infection.Ann Intern Med.1976; 84: 558–560.
10.
BayerA.S., TillmanD.B., ConcepcionN.. Clinical value of teichoic acid antibody titers in the diagnosis and management of the staphylococcemias.West J Med.1980; 132: 294–300.
FowlerV.G.Jr., SandersL.L., SextonD.J.. Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients.Clin Infect Dis.1998; 27: 478–486.
16.
CapdevilaJ.A., SegarraA., PlanesA.. Long-term follow-up of patients with catheter related sepsis (crs) treated without catheter removal. In: Program and abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; September 17-20, 1995; San Francisco, Calif. Abstract J3.
17.
RaadI.I., SabbaghM.F.. Optimal duration of therapy for catheter-related Staphylo-coccus aureus bacteremia: a study of 55 cases and review.Clin Infect Dis.1992; 14: 75–82.
JacobsonM.A., GellermannH., ChambersH.. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and recurrent staphylococcal infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and AIDS-related complex.Am J Med.1988; 85: 172–176.
20.
MortaraL.A., BayerA.S.. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis.Infect Dis Clin North Am.1993; 7: 53–68.
21.
SchrenzelJ., SchockmelG., BregenzerT.. Severe staphylococcal infections: a randomized trial comparing quinolone plus rifampin (IV then PO) with conventional IV therapy. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; November 12-15, 1998; San Francisco, Calif. Abstract A93.
22.
DworkinR.J., LeeB.L., SandeM.A.. Treatment of right-sided Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in intravenous drug users with ciprofloxacin and rifampicin.Lancet.1989; 2: 1071–1073.
23.
HeldmanA.W., HartertT.V., RayS.C.. Oral antibiotic treatment of right-sided staphylococcal endocarditis in injection drug users: prospective randomized comparison with parenteral therapy.Am J Med.1996; 101: 68–76.
24.
AcocellaG.. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of rifampin in humans.Rev Infect Dis.1983; 5(suppl 3): S428–S432.
25.
FarrB.M.. Rifamycins. In: MandellG.L., BennettJ.E., DolinR., eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases.5th ed.Philadelphia, Pa: Churchill Livingstone; 2000: 348–361.
26.
MakiD.G., MermelL.A.. Infections due to infusion therapy. In: BennettJ.V., BrachmanP.S., eds. Hospital Infections.Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven;1998: 689–724.
27.
SeifertH.. Catheter-related infections due to Gram-negative bacilli. In: SeifertH., JansenB., FarrB.M., eds. Catheter-Related Infections.New York, NY: M. Dekker;1997: 111–138.
28.
MermelL.A., FarrB.M., SherertzR.J.. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections.Clin Infect Dis.2001; 32: 1249–1272.
29.
PenaC., PujolM., ArdanuyC.. An outbreak of hospital-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia, including strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase.J Hosp Infect.2001; 47: 53–59.
30.
MartinoR., GomezL., PericasR.. Bacteraemia caused by non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli and Aeromonas species in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis.2000; 19: 320–323.
31.
FriedmanN., KormanT., FairleyC.. Bacteraemia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an analysis of 45 episodes.J Infect.2002; 45: 47.
32.
MartinoR., SantamariaA., MunozL.. Bacteremia by gram-negative bacilli in patients with hematologic malignancies: comparison of the clinical presentation and outcome of infections by enterobacteria and non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli.Acta Haematol.1999; 102: 7–11.
33.
RoseH.D.. Venous catheter-associated candidemia.Am J Med Sci.1978; 275: 265–269.
34.
RexJ.H., BennettJ.E., SugarA.M.. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia: Candidemia Study Group and the National Institute.N Engl J Med.1994; 331: 1325–1330.
35.
AnaissieE.J., VartivarianS.E., Abi-SaidD.. Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in the treatment of hematogenous candidiasis: a matched cohort study.Am J Med.1996; 101: 170–176.
36.
DatoV.M., DajaniA.S.. Candidemia in children with central venous catheters: role of catheter removal and amphotericin B therapy.Pediatr Infect Dis J.1990; 9: 309–314.
37.
NguyenM.H., PeacockJ.E.Jr., TannerD.C.. Therapeutic approaches in patients with candidemia: evaluation in a multicenter prospective observational study.Arch Intern Med.1995; 155: 2429–2435.
RexJ.H., WalshT.J., SobelJ.D.. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis: Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clin Infect Dis.2000; 30: 662–678.
40.
NucciM., AnaissieE.. Should vascular catheters be removed from all patients with candidemia? An evidence-based review.Clin Infect Dis.2002; 34: 591–599.
41.
NucciM., ColomboA.L., SilveiraF.. Risk factors for death in patients with candidemia.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.1998; 19: 846–850.
42.
NucciM., SilveiraM.I., SpectorN.. Risk factors for death among cancer patients with fungemia.Clin Infect Dis.1998; 27: 107–111.
43.
AnaissieE.J., RexJ.H., UzumO.. Predictors of adverse outcome in cancer patients with candidemia.Am J Med.1998; 104: 238–245.
44.
LuzzatiR., AmalfitanoG., LazzariniL.. Nosocomial candidemia in non-neutropenic patients at an Italian tertiary care hospital.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis.2000; 19: 602–607.
45.
ThyraultM., GachotB., ChastangC.. Septic shock in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.Intensive Care Med.1997; 23: 1018–1023.
46.
AnnaneD., SebilleV., TrocheG.. A 3-level prognostic classification in septic shock based on cortisol levels and cortisol response to corticotropin.JAMA.2000; 283: 1038–1045.
47.
NucciM., AnaissieE.. Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut?Clin Infect Dis.2001; 33: 1959–1967.
48.
MermelL.A., McCormickR.D., SpringmanS.R.. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular sub-typing.Am J Med.1991; 91(3B): 197S–205S.
49.
BjornsonH.S., ColleyR., BowerR.H.. Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition.Surgery.1982; 92: 720–727.
50.
BlotF., ChachatyE., RaynardB.. Mechanisms and risk factors for infection of pulmonary artery catheters and introducer sheaths in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit.J Hosp Infect.2001; 48: 289–297.
51.
MakiD.G., RingerM., AlvaradoC.J.. Prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters.Lancet.1991; 338: 339–343.
52.
SheehanG., LeichtK., O'BrienM.. Chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of vascular-catheter infection. In: Program and abstracts of the 33rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; October 17-20, 1993; New Orleans, La. Abstract 1616.
53.
MimozO., PieroniL., LawrenceC.. Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients.Crit Care Med.1996; 24: 1818–1823.
54.
HumarA., OstromeckiA., DirenfeldJ.. Prospective randomized trial of 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% tincture of chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of central venous catheter infection.Clin Infect Dis.2000; 31: 1001–1007.
55.
MakiD.G., KnasinskiV., NaransL.L.. A randomized trial of a novel 1% chlorhexidine-75% alcohol tincture vs 10% povidone-iodine for cutaneous disinfection with vascular catheters. In: Program and abstracts of the 31st Annual Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Meeting; April 1-3, 2001; Toronto, Ontario. Abstract A142.
56.
GarlandJ.S., BuckR.K., MaloneyP.. Comparison of 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization in neonates: a prospective trial.Pediatr Infect Dis J.1995; 14: 510–516.
57.
MeffreC., GirardR., HajjarJ.. Povidone-iodine versus alcoholic chlorhexidine for disinfection of the insertion site of peripheral venous catheters: results of a multicenter randomized trial.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.1996; 17(5 suppl 2): A64. Abstract.
58.
CobbettS., LeBlancA.. IV site infection: a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of three methods of skin antisepsis.J Intraven Nurs.1999; 15: 48–49. Abstract.
59.
SessoR., BarbosaD., LemeI.L.. Staphylococcus aureus prophylaxis in hemodialysis patients using central venous catheter: effect of mupirocin ointment.J Am Soc Nephrol.1998; 9: 1085–1092.
60.
Zakrzewska-BodeA., MuytjensH.L., LiemK.D.. Mupirocin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci, after topical prophylaxis for the reduction of colonization of central venous catheters.J Hosp Infect.1995; 31: 189–193.
61.
CrnichC.J., MakiD.G.. The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices.Clin Infect Dis.2002; 34: 1232–1242.
62.
WilleJ.C., Blusse van Oud AlbasA., ThewessenE.A.. A comparison of two transparent film-type dressings in central venous therapy.J Hosp Infect.1993; 23: 113–121.
63.
MakiD.G., RingerM.. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters: gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing.JAMA.1987; 258: 2396–2403.
64.
MadeoM., MartinC.R., TurnerC.. A randomized trial comparing Arglaes (a transparent dressing containing silver ions) to Tegaderm (a transparent polyurethane dressing) for dressing peripheral arterial catheters and central vascular catheters.Intensive Crit Care Nurs.1998; 14: 187–191.
65.
HanazakiK., ShinguK., AdachiW.. Chlorhexidine dressing for reduction in microbial colonization of the skin with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized controlled trial.J Hosp Infect.1999; 42: 165–168.
66.
GarlandJ.S., AlexC.P., MuellerC.D.. A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates.Pediatrics.2001; 107: 1431–1436.
67.
MakiD.G., MermelL.A., KlugerD.M.. The efficacy of a chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge (biopatch) for the prevention of intravascular catheter related infection: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. In: Program and abstracts of the 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; September 17-20, 2000; Toronto, Ontario. Abstract 1430.
68.
MakiD.G., CobbL., GarmanJ.K.. An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.Am J Med.1988; 85: 307–314.
69.
BonawitzS.C., HammellE.J., KirkpatrickJ.R.. Prevention of central venous catheter sepsis: a prospective randomized trial.Am Surg.1991; 57: 618–623.
70.
FlowersRHIII, SchwenzerK.J., KopelR.F.. Efficacy of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection: a randomized, controlled trial.JAMA.1989; 261: 878–883.
71.
BabycosC.R., BarrocasA., WebbW.R.. A prospective randomized trial comparing the silver-impregnated collagen cuff with the bedside tunneled subclavian catheter.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1993; 17: 61–63.
72.
SmithH.O., DeVictoriaC.L., GarfinkelD.. A prospective randomized comparison of an attached silver-impregnated cuff to prevent central venous catheter-associated infection.Gynecol Oncol.1995; 58: 92–100.
73.
MermelL.A., StolzS.M., MakiD.G.. Surface antimicrobial activity of heparin-bonded and antiseptic-impregnated vascular catheters.J Infect Dis.1993; 167: 920–924.
74.
MossH.A., TebbsS.E., FaroquiM.H.. A central venous catheter coated with benzalkonium chloride for the prevention of catheter-related microbial colonization.Eur J Anaesthesiol.2000; 17: 680–687.
75.
JaegerK., OsthausA., HeineJ.. Efficacy of a benzalkonium chloride-impregnated central venous catheter to prevent catheter-associated infection in cancer patients.Chemotherapy.2001; 47: 50–55.
76.
VeenstraD.L., SaintS., SahaS.. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis.JAMA.1999; 281: 261–267.
77.
MermelL.A.. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.Ann Intern Med.2000; 132: 391–402.
78.
RaadI., DarouicheR., HachemR.. The broad-spectrum activity and efficacy of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin.J Infect Dis.1996; 173: 418–424.
79.
DarouicheR.O., RaadI.I., HeardS.O.. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters: Catheter Study Group.N Engl J Med.1999; 340: 1–8.
80.
RaadI., DarouicheR., DupuisJ.. Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections: a randomized, double-blind trial. The Texas Medical Center Catheter Study Group.Ann Intern Med.1997; 127: 267–274.
81.
RaadI.I., HackettB., HannaH.. Use of antibiotic impregnated catheters associated with significant decrease in nosocomial bloodstream infections in critically ill cancer patients. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Atlanta, Ga: March 5-9, 2000. Abstract S-W3-05.
82.
MarikP.E., AbrahamG., CareauP.. The ex vivo antimicrobial activity and colonization rate of two antimicrobial-bonded central venous catheters.Crit Care Med.1999; 27: 1128–1131.
83.
SampathL., TambeS., ModakS.. Comparison of the efficacy of antiseptic and antibiotic catheters impregnated on both their luminal and outer surfaces. In: Program and abstracts of the 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; September 26-29, 1999; San Francisco, Calif. Abstract 1917.
84.
GoldschmidtH., HahnU., SalwenderH.J.. Prevention of catheter-related infections by silver coated central venous catheters in oncological patients.Zentralbl Bakteriol.1995; 283: 215–223.
85.
BachA., EberhardtH., FrickA.. Efficacy of silver-coating central venous catheters in reducing bacterial colonization.Crit Care Med.1999; 27: 515–521.
86.
BoswaldM., LugauerS., RegenfusA.. Reduced rates of catheter-associated infection by use of a new silver-impregnated central venous catheter.Infection.1999; 27(suppl 1): S56–S60.
87.
CarbonR.T., LugauerS., GeitnerU.. Reducing catheter-associated infections with silver-impregnated catheters in long-term therapy of children.Infection.1999; 27(suppl 1): S69–S73.
88.
ParkhouseDAFH, HockingG.R., ShaikhL.S.. Advanced catheter related infection and line sepsis following the use of Ventex central venous catheters in the critically ill.Crit Care Med.2000; 28(12 suppl): A54. Abstract.
89.
BongJ.J., KiteP., WilcoxM.H.. Efficacy of silver iontophoretic central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection amongst high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial. In: Program and abstracts of the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Chicago, Ill; December 16-19, 2001. Abstract K-1425.
90.
Ibanez-NollaJ.J., CorralM.L., NollaM.. A randomized study using oligon vantex central venous catheters (cvc) to reduce bacterial colonization. In: Program and abstracts of the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Chicago, Ill; December 16-19, 2001. Abstract K-1428.
91.
CappelloM., De PauwL., BastinG.. Central venous access for haemodialysis using the Hickman catheter.Nephrol Dial Transplant.1989; 4: 988–992.
92.
DrydenM.S., SamsonA., LudlamH.A.. Infective complications associated with the use of the Quinton “Permcath” for long-term central vascular access in haemodialysis.J Hosp Infect.1991; 19: 257–262.
93.
GroegerJ.S., LucasA.B., ThalerH.T.. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer.Ann Intern Med.1993; 119: 1168–1174.
94.
CrnichC.J., MakiD.G.. The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. II. Long-term devices.Clin Infect Dis.2002; 34: 1362–1368.
95.
GroegerJ.S., LucasA.B., CoitD.. A prospective, randomized evaluation of the effect of silver impregnated subcutaneous cuffs for preventing tunneled chronic venous access catheter infections in cancer patients.Ann Surg.1993; 218: 206–210.
96.
GrahamD.R., KeldermansM.M., KlemmL.W.. Infectious complications among patients receiving home intravenous therapy with peripheral, central, or peripherally placed central venous catheters.Am J Med.1991; 91(3B): 95S–100S.
97.
DuerksenD.R., PapineauN., SiemensJ.. Peripherally inserted central catheters for parenteral nutrition: a comparison with centrally inserted catheters.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1999; 23: 85–89.
98.
CowlC.T., WeinstockJ.V., Al-JurfA.. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.Clin Nutr.2000; 19: 237–243.
99.
JanesM., KalynA., PinelliJ.. A randomized trial comparing peripherally inserted central venous catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters in infants with very low birth weight.J Pediatr Surg.2000; 35: 1040–1044.
100.
YamamotoA.J., SolomonJ.A., SoulenM.C.. Sutureless securement device reduces complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters.J Vasc Interv Radiol.2002; 13: 77–81.
101.
TrerotolaS.O., JohnsonM.S., ShahH.. Tunneled hemodialysis catheters: use of a silver-coated catheter for prevention of infection: a randomized study.Radiology.1998; 207: 491–496.
102.
O'GradyN.P., AlexanderM., DellingerE.P.. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.MMWR Recomm Rep.2002; 51(RR-10): 1–29.
103.
RackoffW.R., WeimanM., JakobowskiD.. A randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of a heparin and vancomycin solution in preventing central venous catheter infections in children.J Pediatr.1995; 127: 147–151.
104.
DaghistaniD., HornM., RodriguezZ.. Prevention of indwelling central venous catheter sepsis.Med Pediatr Oncol.1996; 26: 405–408.
105.
SchwartzC., HenricksonK.J., RoghmannK.. Prevention of bacteremia attributed to luminal colonization of tunneled central venous catheters with vancomycin-susceptible organisms.J Clin Oncol.1990; 8: 1591–1597.
106.
CarratalaJ., NiuboJ., Fernandez-SevillaA.. Randomized, double-blind trial of an antibiotic-lock technique for prevention of Gram-positive central venous catheter-related infection in neutropenic patients with cancer.Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1999; 43: 2200–2204.
107.
HenricksonK.J., AxtellR.A., HooverS.M.. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections and thrombotic events in immunocompromised children by the use of vancomycin/ciprofloxacin/heparin flush solution: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial.J Clin Oncol.2000; 18: 1269–1278.
108.
GarlandJ.S., HenricksonK.J., MakiD.G.. A prospective randomized trial of vancomycin-heparin lock for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in an NNICU. In: Program and abstracts of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies; May 4-7, 2002; Baltimore, Md. Abstract 1734.
109.
MessingB., ManF., ColimonR.. Antibiotic lock technique is an effective treatment of bacterial catheter related sepsis during parenteral nutrition.Clin Nutr.1990; 9: 220–227.
110.
MessingB., Peitra-CohenS., DebureA.. Antibiotic-lock technique: a new approach to optimal therapy for catheter-related sepsis in home-parenteral nutrition patients.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1988; 12: 185–189.
111.
RaoJ.S., O'MearaA., HarveyT.. A new approach to the management of Broviac catheter infection.J Hosp Infect.1992; 22: 109–116.
112.
KrzywdaE.A., AndrisD.A., EdmistonC.E.Jr.,. Treatment of Hickman catheter sepsis using antibiotic lock technique.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.1995; 16: 596–598.
113.
LonguetP., DouardM.C., ArletG.. Venous access port-related bacteremia in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or cancer: the reservoir as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool.Clin Infect Dis.2001; 32: 1776–1783.
114.
DomingoP., FontanetA., SanchezF.. Morbidity associated with long-term use of totally implantable ports in patients with AIDS.Clin Infect Dis.1999; 29: 346–351.
115.
SpaffordP.S., SinkinR.A., CoxC.. Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance: recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.1994; 44: 1–13.
116.
SieradzkiK., RobertsR.B., SerurD.. Recurrent peritonitis in a patient on dialysis and prophylactic vancomycin.Lancet.1998; 351: 880–881.
117.
HiramatsuK., AritakaN., HanakiH.. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin.Lancet.1997; 350: 1670–1673.
118.
HiramatsuK., AritakaA.N., HanakiH.. Interim guidelines for prevention and control of staphylococcal infections associated with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.1997; 46: 626–628.
119.
SmithT.L., PearsonM.L., WilcoxK.R.. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Working Group.N Engl J Med.1999; 340: 493–501.
120.
SieradzkiK., RobertsR.B., HaberS.W.. The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.N Engl J Med.1999; 340: 517–523.
121.
RaadI., BuzaidA., RyneJ.. Minocycline and ethylenediaminetetraacetate for the prevention of recurrent vascular catheter infections.Clin Infect Dis.1997; 25: 149–151.
122.
BleyerA., MasonL., RaadI.. A randomized, double-blind trial comparing minocycline/edta vs heparin as flush solutions for hemodialysis catheters. In: Program and abstracts of the Fourth Decennial Conference Program Committee; March 5-9, 2000; Atlanta, Ga. Abstract P-S1-31.