Measures of normal variations in personality, called "psychological type," are frequently used in education (e.g., to identify learning styles) and counseling (e.g., in career counseling). However, the most frequently-used measure of types, developed by Myers and Briggs, has been criticized on various psychometric grounds. The present study investigated the psychometric properties of an alternative measure, the Personal Preferences Self-Description Questionnaire (PPSDQ), which employs normative rather than ipsative (forced-choice) items. Because previous studies of the measure have primarily used older and highly literate participants, the present study was conducted with 328 Hispanic high school students to determine whether the sound psychometric quality of PPSDQ scores was compromised by vocabulary or language issues. The results of reliability and factor analyses were generally favorable as regards PPSDQ score integrity.
Arnau, R. C.
, Thompson, B., & Rosen, D. H. (in press). Alternative measures of Jungian personality constructs. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development.
2.
Bayne, R.
(1995). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A critical review and practical guide. London: Chapman & Hall.
3.
Byrne, B. M.
(1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
Campbell, D. T.
(1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297-312.
5.
Carlson, J. G.
(1989). Affirmative: In support of researching the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 484-486.
6.
Cattell, R. B.
(1956). Validation and intensification of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 205-214.
7.
Cattell, R. B.
, & Burdsal, C. A. (1975). The radical parcel double factoring design: A solution to the item-vs-parcel controversy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 165-179.
8.
Cronbach, L. J.
(1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Intelligence: Measurement theory and public policy (pp. 147-171). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.
Fan, X.
, Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (in press). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling.
10.
Gorsuch, R. L.
(1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Healy, C. C.
(1989). Negative: The MBTI: Not ready for routine use in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 487-488.
12.
Jackson, S. L.
, Parker, C. P., & Dipboye, R. L. (1996). A comparison of competing models underlying responses to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 99-115.
13.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation
. (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Jung, C. G.
(1923). Psychological types. London: Routledge.
15.
Kerlinger, F. N.
(1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
16.
Kier, F. J.
, Melancon, J. G., & Thompson, B. (1998). Reliability and validity of scores on the Personal Preferences Self-Description Questionnaire (PPSDQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 612-622.
17.
Kier, F.
, & Thompson, B. (1997, January). A new measure of Jungian psychological types for use in counseling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 222)
18.
McCaulley, M. H.
(1991). Additional comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A response to comments. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 182-185.
19.
Melancon, J. G.
, & Thompson, B. (1994, November). An adjectival self-description checklist evaluating Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) scores: Concurrent and construct score validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 379 339)
20.
Melancon, J. G.
, & Thompson, B. (1996, April). Measurement of self-perceptions of Jungian psychological types. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395 237)
21.
Merenda, P. F.
(1991). Additional comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 179-181.
22.
Moss, P. A.
(1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62, 229-258.
23.
Moss, P. A.
(1995). Themes and variations in validity theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(2), 5-12.
24.
Myers, I. B.
, & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
25.
Nunnally, J. C.
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Popper, K. R.
(1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
27.
Read, H.
, Fordham, M., Adler, G., & McGuire, W. (Eds). (1953-1979). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung (Bollinger Series, 20 vols., R.F.C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
Reynolds, W. M.
(1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119-125.
29.
Sharp, D.
(1987). Personality types:Jung's model of typology. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Inner City Books.
30.
Shepard, L. A.
(1993). Evaluating test validity. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 19, pp. 405-450). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
31.
Thompson, B.
(1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837-847.
32.
Thompson, B.
(1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 5-19.
33.
Thompson, B.
, & Ackerman, C. (1994). Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In J. Kapes, M. Mastie, & E. Whitfield (Eds.), A counselor's guide to career assessment instruments (3rd ed., pp. 283-287). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
34.
Thompson, B.
, & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: An historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 213-224.
35.
Thompson, B.
, & Melancon, J. (1995, January). Measurement integrity of scores from a self-description checklist evaluating Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) types: A confirnatoiy factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Dallas, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 487)
36.
Thompson, B.
, & Melancon, J. G. (1996a, January). Measuring Jungian psychological types: Some confirmatory factor analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 393 872)
37.
Thompson, B.
, & Melancon, J. (1996b, November). Using item 'testlets /'parcels' in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using the PPSDQ-78. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 404 349)
38.
Thompson, B.
, & Melancon, J. G. (1997, January). Measurement of self-perceptions of Jungian psychological types. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.
39.
Thompson, B.
, & Stone, E. (1994, January). Concurrent validity of scores from an adjectival self-description checklist in relation to Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) scores. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367 706)
40.
Vacha-Haase, T.
(1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 6-20.
41.
Yabroff, W.
(1990). The inner image: A resource for type development. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
