Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The intercorrelation matrices of the standardization sample of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML), a multi-component measure of memory functioning in children ages 5 to 17 years, were submitted to a hierarchical exploratory principal factor analysis (PFA). The PFA solutions were examined and compared with the published principal components analysis (PCA) solutions with the goal of examining the validity of the clinical scale configuration (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Learning) proposed by the test authors. Results of the PFA differ from the PCA and do not provide statistical support for the existing three-scale structure nor the division between memory and learning. Specific factor loadings on the majority of subtests are higher than the common factor loadings indicating low shared variance. The low communalities together with the poor interpretability of the factor structure suggests that the subtests should be interpreted clinically as unique entities first and secondarily as factors. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Memory factor analysis children clinical interpretation WRAML

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aylward, G. P. , Gioia, G. A. , Verhulst, S. J. , & Bell, S. (1995). Factor structure of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning in a clinical population. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 132-142.

Boyd, T. A. (1988). Clinical assessment of memory in children: A developmental framework for practice. In M. G. Tramontana & S. R. Hooper (Eds.), Assessment issues in child neuropsychology (pp. 177-204). New York: Plenum Press.

Brown, A. L. (1975). The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 103-152). New York: Academic Press.

Callahan, T. S. , Haut, J. S. , Haut, M. W. , & Franzen, M. D. (1993, August). Confirmatory factor analysis of the WRAML. Paper presented at the 101st annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Factor Analysis Programs for the Apple II Plus. Chapel Hill, NC: L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory.

Carroll, J. B. (1988). Individual differences in cognitive functioning. In R. C. Atkinson , R. J. Herrnstein , G. Lindzey , & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Delis, D. C. , Kramer, J. H. , Kaplan, E. , & Ober, B. A. (1994). California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Durday, C. (1993). The Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning: A review. Child Assessment News, 3, 9-11.

10.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory factor analysis. In J. Nessleroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 231-258). New York: Plenum Press.

11.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1990). Common factor analysis versus component analysis: Some well and little known facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 33-39.

12.

Kaufman, A. S. (1975). Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 61/2 and 161/2 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 135-147.

13.

Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent Testing With the WISCII. New York: Wiley & Sons.

14.

Montanelli, R. G. , & Humphreys, L. G. (1976). Latent roots of random data correlation matrices with squared multiple correlations on the diagonal: A Monte Carlo study. Psychometrika, 41, 341-348.

15.

Schmid, J. , & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53-61.

16.

Schneider, W. , & Pressley, M. (1989). Memory development between 2 and 20. New York: Springer-Verlag.

17.

Sheslow, D. , & Adams, W. (1990). Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning: Administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Assessment Systems.

18.

Snook, S. C. , & Gorsuch, R. L. (1989). Principal component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 148-154.

19.

Velicer, W. F. , & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1-28.

20.

Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

21.

Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

22.

Wechsler, D. , & Stone, C. P. (1987). Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

Re-Examining the Factor Structure of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning: Implications for Clinical Interpretation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References