Specificity of the WAIS-R Subtests with Psychiatric Inpatients

Abstract

Subtest specificities were determined for each of the 11 WAIS-R subtests for a sample of 200 psychiatric inpatients. The subtest's shared variance (defined as the multiple squared correlation between a subtest and all remaining subtests) was subtracted from reliable variance (defined as the subtest's reliability) to yield a measure of subtest specificity. The Information, Arithmetic, Vocabulary, Comprehension, Similarities, Picture Arrangement, and Digit Symbol subtests were judged to have adequate to ample specificity for ipsative interpretation. The Object Assembly, Digit Span, Picture Completion, and Block Design subtests were judged to have inadequate specificity for ipsative interpretation. Implications for the interpretation of WAIS-R results with psychiatric inpatients are discussed.

Keywords

WAIS-R subtest specificity psychiatric inpatients

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Bannatyne, A. (1974). Diagnosis: A note on recategorization of the WISC scaled scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 272-274.

Boone, D. E. (1992). Reliability of the WAIS-R with psychiatric inpatients.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 72-76.

Cohen,J. (1952). A factor-analytically based rationale for the Wechsler-Bellevue. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 272-277.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Groth-Marnat, G. (1996). Handbook of psychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.

Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Kuder, G. F. , & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151-160.

10.

Meyer, R. G. , & Deitsch, S. E. (1996). The clinician's handbook (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

11.

Parker, K. C. H. (1983). Factor analysis of the WAIS-R at nine age levels between 16 and 74 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 302-308.

12.

Piedmont, R. L. , Sokolove, R. L. , & Fleming, M. Z. (1989). On WAIS-R difference scores in a psychiatric sample. Psychological Assessment, 1, 155-159.

13.

Rapaport, D. , Gill, M. , & Schafer, R. (1945). Diagnostic psychological testing. Volume I. Chicago: Year Book Publishers.

14.

Silverstein, A. B. (1977). Comparison of two criteria for determining the number of factors. Psychological Reports, 41, 387-390.

15.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.