Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Converging lines of evidence suggest that attorneys are influencing data relied upon by psychological experts in forensic cases. This is a problem because a consequence of attorney prompting may be invalid expert opinions that mislead rather than inform the trier of fact. Attorneys influence psychological data by a variety of means. They advise their clients how to respond to psychological tests, make suggestions of what to tell examining psychologists and what to emphasize, and lead patients not to disclose certain information important to psychologists. The purpose of this article is to alert psychologists to a growing threat to the validity of psychological and neuropsychological evaluations in forensic matters. Several examples of attorney preparation of clients for examinations are described.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author

Baer

Wetter

Berry

(1995). Effects of information about validity scales on underreporting of symptoms on the MMPI-2: An analogue investigation. Assessment, 2, 189–200

Bureau of National Affairs. (1994, July 13). Importance of dealings with psychologists in harassment cases is stressed by panel. BNA'S Employment Discrimination Report, 3, 52–53

Butcher

J. N.

Dahlstrom

W. G.

Graham

J. R.

Tellegen

Kaemmer

(1989). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press

Butterworth Legal Publishers. (1994). Parker's 1994 California code of civil procedure. Carlsbad, CA: Author

Dolan

(1994, June 1). Defense seldom rests on issues of ethics & duty. Los Angeles Times, p. A17

Fillingim

R. B.

Fine

M. A.

(1986). The effects of internal versus external information processing on symptom perception in an exercise setting. Health Psychology, 5, 115–123

Hathaway

S. R.

McKinley

J. C.

(1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press

Lailhengue v. Mobil. (1990). Civil Action No. 90–4425, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

10.

Legate

B. L.

(1996, June 22). Presenting a tort claim in a first party system-strategies for recovery of a loss of earning capacity benefit. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Bar Association-Ontario Continuing Legal Education, Ontario, Canada

11.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(1980). Perceptual and environmental determinants of coughing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 83–91

12.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Lightner

J. M.

(1980). Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 165–174

13.

Platt

J. J.

Husband

S. D.

(1986). Post-traumatic stress disorder in forensic practice. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4, 29–56

14.

Ragge v. MCA/Universal Studios 165 F. 605 (Cal. 1995)

15.

Resnick

P. J.

(1988). Malingering of posttraumatic disorders. In Rogers

(Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 84–103). New York: Guilford

16.

Rosen

G. M.

(1995). The Aleutian Enterprise sinking and posttraumatic stress disorder: Misdiagnosis in clinical and forensic settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 82–87

17.

Taylor

J. S.

Harp

J. H.

Elliott

(1992). Preparing the plaintiff in the mild brain injury case. Trial Diplomacy Journal, 15, 65–72

18.

Wetter

M. W.

Corrigan

S. K.

(1995). Providing information to clients about psychological tests: A survey of attorneys' and law students' attitudes. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 474–477

19.

Williams

C. W.

Lees-Haley

P. R.

Price

J. R.

(1996). Effect of self-attention versus distraction on physical and psychological symptoms. Manuscript submitted for publication

20.

Youngjohn

J. R.

(1995). Confirmed attorney coaching prior to neuropsychological evaluation. Assessment, 2, 279–283

Attorneys Influence Expert Evidence in Forensic Psychological and Neuropsychological Cases

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References