The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Observer form of the five-factor model of personality by examining agreement between self- and observer ratings. Both partners of 49 young, adult couples rated themselves and their partners on the NEO-FFI. The results provide preliminary evidence of the measurement utility of the NEO-FFI Observer form. Specifically, (a) each personality scale possessed acceptable levels of internal reliability, (b) five factors consistent with the five-factor model of personality emerged in both ratings forms, and (c) there was significant self-observer agreement for all five personality scales. Self-observer agreement was assessed by correlations as well as analyses that test a more stringent definition of agreement. Overall, there is consensus across analyses that points to a substantial amount of concordance between partners' self- and observer ratings.
ByrneD. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. InBerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 35–89). New York: Academic Press.
3.
ColvinC. R.FunderD.C. (1991). Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 884–894.
4.
CoolidgeF. L.BumsE. M.MooneyJ. A. (1995). Reliability of observer ratings in the assessment of personality ratings: A preliminary study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 22–29.
5.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.
7.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1991). NEO-FFI Form S.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
FunderD. C. (1980). On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 48, 473–493.
10.
FunderD. C. (1989). “Accuracy in personality judgment and the dancing bear.” InBussD. M.CantorN. (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 210–233). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1988). Friends and Strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149–158.
12.
FunderD. C.DobrothK. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409–418.
13.
FunderD. C.WestS. G. (1993). Consensus, self-other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 61, 457–476.
14.
HillC. T.StullD. E. (1981). Sex differences in effects of social and value similarity in same-sex friendships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 488–502.
15.
HoldenR. R.FekkenG. C. (1994). The NEO five-factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 441–444.
16.
KammannR.SmithR.MarticC.McQueenM. (1984). Low accuracy in judgments of others' psychological well-being as seen from a phenomenological perspective. Journal of Personality, 52, 107–123.
17.
LinL. (1992). Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 48, 599–604.
18.
MarshH. W.ByrneB. M. (1993). Do we see ourselves as others infer: A comparison of self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of self-concept from two continents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 49–58.
19.
McCraeR. R. (1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 293–303.
20.
McCraeR. R. (1993). Agreement of personality profiles across observers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 25–40.
21.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
22.
MutenE. (1991). Self-reports, spouse ratings, and psychophysiological assessment in a behavioral medicine program: An application of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 449–464.
23.
PaunonenS. V. (1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823–833.
24.
PiedmontR. L. (1994). Validation of the NEO PI-R Observer form for college students: Toward a paradigm for studying personality development. Assessment, 1, 259–268.
25.
ShraugerJ. S.SchoenemannT. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549–573.
26.
SoldzS.BudmanS.DembyA.MerryJ. (1995). Personality traits as seen by patients, therapists and other group members: The Big Five in personality disorder groups. Psychotherapy, 32, 678–687.
