This study details the psychometric evaluation of the Response to Conflict Scale (RTC), a 24-item measure of maladaptive responses to marital conflict. The inventory showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct and discriminant validity, and classification efficiency. Clinical utility of the RTC is also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldessariniR. J.FinklesteinS.AranaG. W. (1983). The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 569–573
2.
BaucomD. H.MehlmanS. K. (1984). Predicting marital status following behavioral marital therapy: A comparison of models of marital relationships. In HahlwegK.JacobsonN. S. (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis & modification (pp. 89–104). New York: Guilford Press
3.
BirchlerG. R.Fals-StewartW. (1992, August). The Response to Conflict Scale: A brief measure of maladaptive marital conflict. Paper presented at the 100th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
4.
BirchlerG. R.Fals-StewartW.SchaferJ. (1994). The Response to Conflict Scale: A brief measure of maladaptive marital conflict. The Behavior Therapist, 17, 68–69
5.
BirchlerG. R.WebbL. J. (1977). Discriminating interaction behaviors in happy and unhappy marriages. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 494–495
6.
BirchlerG. R.WeissR. L.VincentJ. P. (1975). Multimethod analysis of reinforcement exchange between maritally distressed and nondistressed spouse and stranger dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 349–360
7.
ComreyA. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press
8.
CrowneD. D.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 24, 349–354
9.
DarlingtonR. B. (1975). Radicals and squares: Statistical methods for the behavioral sciences. Ithaca, NY: Logan Hill Press
10.
GorsuchR. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
11.
GorsuchR. (1991). Unimult. Alameda, CA: Unimult
12.
GottmanJ. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press
13.
GottmanJ. M. (1990). How marriages change. In PattersonG. R. (Ed.), Depression and aggression in family interaction (pp. 75–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
14.
JacobsonN. S. (1979). Increasing positive behavior in severely distressed marital relationships: The effects of problem-solving training. Behavior Therapy, 10, 311–326
15.
LockeH. J.WallaceK. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255
16.
OlsonD. H.RyderR. (1978). Marital and Family Interaction Coding System (MFICS): Abbreviated coding manual. St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota
17.
SpanierG. R. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New measures for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28
18.
SnyderD. K.WillsR. M.KeiserT. W. (1981). Empirical validation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory: An actuarial approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 262–268
19.
StrausM. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 7, 75–88
20.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row
21.
WeissR. L. (1990). MICS-IV Marital Interaction Coding System: Training and reference manual for coders. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon, Marital Studies Program, Eugene
22.
WeissR. L.HopsH.PattersonG. R. (1973). A framework for conceptualizing marital conflict, a technology for altering it, some data for evaluating it. In ClarkF. W.HamerlynckL. A. (Eds.), Critical issues in research and practice: Proceedings of the fourth Banff international conference on behavior modification. Champaign, IL: Research Press
