Base Rates of WAIS-R Qualitative Information for Persons 75 Years and Older

Abstract

Base rates of WAIS-R qualitative errors for normal persons 75 years and older were provided for Picture Arrangement, Block Design, and Digit Symbol subtests. A second sample of cognitively impaired elderly was used for comparison. Most errors were rare and occurred in less than 5% of the normal subjects. In contrast, some errors such as placing the Picture Arrangement cards vertically and skipping numbers on Digit Symbol were manifested relatively frequently. Although persons with cognitive dysfunction tended to commit more qualitative errors, only four errors occurred significantly more frequently for persons with brain dysfunction. Interpretation of qualitative errors for elderly persons must be done cautiously and they should not be considered pathognomonic of chronic, diffuse brain impairment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Daigneault, S. , Braun, C. M. J. , & Whitaker, H. A. (1992). Early effects of normal aging on perseverative and nonperseverative prefrontal measures. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8, 99-114.

Goldstein, G. , & Shelly, C. H. (1981). Does the right hemisphere age more rapidly than the left? Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 65-78.

Goodglass, H. , & Kaplan, E. (1979). Assessment of cognitive deficit in the brain-injured patient. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology (pp. 3-22). New York: Plenum Press.

Kaplan, E. (1990). The process approach to neuropsychological assessment of psychiatric patients. Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 2, 72-87.

Kaplan, E. , Fein, D. , Morris, R. , & Delis, D. C. (1991). WAIS-R as a neuropsychological instrument. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

McFie, J. (1975). Assessment of organic intellectual impairment. London: Academic Press.

Milberg, W. , Hebben, N. , & Kaplan, E. (1986). The Boston process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In I. Grant & K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders (pp. 65-86). New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Mittenberg, W. , Seidenberg, M. , O'Leary, D. S. , & DiGiulio, D. V. (1989). Changes in cerebral functioning associated with normal aging. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 918-932.

11.

Schaie, K. W. , & Schaie, J. P. (1977). Clinical assessment and aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 692-723). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

12.

U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1983). America in transition: An aging society (Current population reports, series P-23, No. 128). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

13.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R). New York: The Psychological Corporation.

14.

Yesavage, J. A. , Brink, T. L. , Rose, T. L. , Lum, O. , Huang, V. , Adey, M. , & Leirer, V. O (1983). Development and validation of a Geriatric Depression Scale. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 31-49.