The Psychometric Properties of the International Work Addiction Scale (IWAS) Using CTT and IRT in a Nationally Representative UK Sample

Abstract

Work addiction refers to a compulsive drive to work relentlessly, leading to personal harm, distress, and impaired relationships. It has been characterised by salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, relapse and problems. Despite scholarly attention, it is not formally recognised within the current versions of existing diagnostic manuals. This study examined the interpretation and research use of scores from the seven-item (IWAS-7) and five-item (IWAS-5) versions of the International Work Addiction Scale (IWAS) across two samples from the United Kingdom (UK): a non-representative employee sample (n = 245, M_age = 28.93) and a nationally representative sample (n = 1,001), with analyses focused on employed individuals (n = 764, M_age = 44.45). Evidence based on internal structure supported a unidimensional interpretation for both versions, with adequate reliability. Evidence based on relations to other variables showed strong associations between IWAS scores and the Bergen Work Addiction Scale (BWAS), and theoretically consistent relationships with relevant constructs. Scalar measurement invariance across gender substantiated comparable IWAS score interpretation for men and women, with no latent mean differences. Item response theory analyses indicated the greatest IWAS score precision at moderate-to-high work addiction levels (θ ≈ 1–3), particularly Items 5 to 7. Findings support interpreting IWAS-7 and IWAS-5 scores as brief indicators of work addiction severity for research use in UK-employed adults.

Keywords

work addiction workaholism International Work Addiction Scale psychometrics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdi

Jahangiri

Kamalinia

Cousins

Mokarami

(2021). Presenteeism and work ability: Development of the Persian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (P-SPS-6) and measurement of its psychometric properties. BMC Psychology, 9(1), Article 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00617-3

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing.

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Andersen

F. B.

Djugum

M. E. T.

Sjåstad

V. S.

Pallesen

(2023). The prevalence of workaholism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1252373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1252373

Andreassen

C. S.

Griffiths

M. D.

Hetland

Kravina

Jensen

Pallesen

(2014). The prevalence of workaholism: A survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. PLOS ONE, 9(8), Article e102446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102446

Andreassen

C. S.

Griffiths

M. D.

Hetland

Pallesen

(2012). Development of a Work Addiction Scale: Development of a Work Addiction Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x

Andreassen

C. S.

Griffiths

M. D.

Sinha

Hetland

Pallesen

(2016). The relationships between workaholism and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE, 11(5), Article e0152978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152978

Andreassen

C. S.

Ursin

Eriksen

H. R.

(2007). The relationship between strong motivation to work, “workaholism”, and health. Psychology & Health, 22(5), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320600941814

Atroszko

P. A.

(2022). Work addiction. In Pontes

H. M.

(Ed.), Behavioral addictions (pp. 213–240). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04772-5_9

10.

Atroszko

P. A.

Charzyńska

Buźniak

Czerwiński

S. K.

Griffiths

M. D.

Jankowska

Kamble

Mizik

Pontes

H. M.

Shane

Sussman

Woropay-Hordziejewicz

N. A.

Pallesen

(2025). Validity, reliability, and cross-cultural comparability of a Problematic Overstudying Scale across European, North American, and Asian countries. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 23(1), 580–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-023-01128-5

11.

Atroszko

P. A.

Kun

Buźniak

Czerwiński

S. K.

Schneider

Woropay-Hordziejewicz

Bakker

A. B.

Balducci

Demetrovics

Griffiths

M. D.

Innstrand

S. T.

Morkevičiūtė

Pallesen

Pontes

H. M.

Sussman

Charzyńska

(2025). Perceived coworkers’ work addiction: Scale development and associations with one’s own workaholism, job stress, and job satisfaction in 85 cultures. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 14(1), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00011

12.

Atroszko

P. A.

Pallesen

Griffiths

M. D.

Andreassen

C. S.

(2017). Work addiction in Poland: Adaptation of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale and relationship with psychopathology. Health Psychology Report, 5(4), 345–355.

13.

Atroszko

P. A.

Sawicki

Kamble

(2019). Cross-cultural pilot study on the relationship between study addiction and narcissism among undergraduate students in Poland and India. Health Psychology Report, 7(4), 325–333.

14.

Baker

F. B.

(2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458219

15.

Bakker

A. B.

Demerouti

Burke

(2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013290

16.

Bakker

A. B.

Demerouti

Sanz-Vergel

(2023). Job demands resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933

17.

Balducci

Alessandri

Zaniboni

Avanzi

Borgogni

Fraccaroli

(2021). The impact of workaholism on day-level workload and emotional exhaustion, and on longer-term job performance. Work & Stress, 35(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1735569

18.

Balkin

R. S.

Reiner

S. M.

Hendricks

Washington

McNeary

Juhnke

G. A.

Hunter

(2018). Life balance and work addiction among African Americans. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12123

19.

Beiler-May

Williamson

R. L.

Clark

M. A.

Carter

N. T.

(2017). Gender bias in the measurement of workaholism. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1198795

20.

Bellali

Minasidou

Galanis

Karagkounis

Liamopoulou

Manomenidis

(2023). Psychometric properties of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale in a Greek sample of health professionals. Health Psychology Report, 11(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/153494

21.

Bereznowski

Atroszko

P. A.

Konarski

(2023). Work addiction, work engagement, job burnout, and perceived stress: A network analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1130069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130069

22.

Bereznowski

Atroszko

P. A.

Konarski

(2024). Network approach to work addiction: A cross-cultural study. Sage Open, 14(2), 21582440241245414. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241245414

23.

Bereznowski

Bereznowska

Atroszko

P. A.

Konarski

(2023). Work addiction and work engagement: A network approach to cross-cultural data. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21(4), 2052–2076.

24.

Bonebright

Clay

Ankenmann

(2000). The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.469

25.

Brand

Rumpf

H.-J.

Demetrovics

Müller

Stark

King

D. L.

Goudriaan

A. E.

Mann

Trotzke

Fineberg

N. A.

Chamberlain

S. R.

Kraus

S. W.

Wegmann

Billieux

Potenza

M. N.

(2022). Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 11(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00035

26.

Brough

Timms

O’Driscoll

M. P.

Kalliath

Siu

O.-L.

Sit

(2014). Work–life balance: A longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2724–2744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.899262

27.

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

28.

Chalmers

R. P.

(2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06

29.

Charzyńska

Buźniak

Czerwiński

S. K.

Woropay-Hordziejewicz

Schneider

Aavik

Adamowic

Adams

B. G.

Al-Mahjoob

S. M.

Almoshawah

S. A. S.

Arrowsmith

Asatsa

Austin

Aziz

Bakker

A. B.

Balducci

Barros

Bălțătescu

Bdier

. . .Atroszko

P. A.

(2025). The International Work Addiction Scale (IWAS): A screening tool for clinical and organizational applications validated in 85 cultures from six continents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 14(1), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00005

30.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

31.

Clark

M. A.

Michel

J. S.

Stevens

G. W.

Howell

J. W.

Scruggs

R. S.

(2014). Workaholism, work engagement and work–home outcomes: Exploring the mediating role of positive and negative emotions. Stress and Health, 30(4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2511

32.

Clark

M. A.

Michel

J. S.

Zhdanova

Pui

S. Y.

Baltes

B. B.

(2016). All work and no play? A meta-analytic examination of the correlates and outcomes of workaholism. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1836–1873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314522301

33.

Cossin

Thaon

Lalanne

(2021). Workaholism prevention in occupational medicine: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137109

34.

Cumming

(2014). The new statistics: Why and How. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966

35.

DeMars

(2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001

36.

Denizci Nazlıgül

Arcan

Griffiths

M. D.

(2022). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(5), 3178–3190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00572-5

37.

Di Stefano

Gaudiino

(2019). Workaholism and work engagement: How are they similar? How are they different? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1590337

38.

Edwards

(2010). Questionnaires in clinical trials: Guidelines for optimal design and administration. Trials, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-2

39.

Embretson

S. E.

Reise

S. P.

(2000). Item response theory for psychologists (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605269

40.

Falco

Girardi

De Carlo

Andreassen

C. S.

Dal Corso

(2022). Work addiction among bank employees in Italy: A contribution to validation of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale with a focus on measurement invariance across gender and managerial status. Sustainability, 14(21), 13714.

41.

Feldt

Rantanen

Hyvönen

Mäkikangas

Huhtala

Pihlajasaari

Kinnunen

(2014). The 9-item Bergen Burnout Inventory: Factorial validity across organizations and measurements of longitudinal data. Industrial Health, 52(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2013-0059

42.

Field

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

43.

Fisher

G. G.

Matthews

R. A.

Gibbons

A. M.

(2016). Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039139

44.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.

45.

Griffiths

(2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197.

46.

Griffiths

(2011). Workaholism—A 21st-century addiction. The Psychologist, 24(10), 740–744.

47.

Hair

Black

Babin

Anderson

(2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

48.

Hambleton

R. K.

Jones

R. W.

(1993). An NCME instructional module on: Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x

49.

Hobfoll

S. E.

(2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062

50.

Hooper

Coughlan

Mullen

(2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

51.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

52.

Karanika-Murray

Duncan

Pontes

H. M.

Griffiths

M. D.

(2015). Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2013-0359

53.

Karanika-Murray

Pontes

H. M.

Griffiths

M. D.

Biron

(2015). Sickness presenteeism determines job satisfaction via affective-motivational states. Social Science & Medicine, 139, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.035

54.

Kenyhercz

Mervó

Lehel

Demetrovics

Kun

(2024). Work addiction and social functioning: A systematic review and five meta-analyses. PLOS ONE, 19(6), Article e0303563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303563

55.

Kline

R. B.

(2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Publications.

56.

Koopman

Pelletier

K. R.

Murray

J. F.

Sharda

C. E.

Berger

M. L.

Turpin

R. S.

Hackleman

Gibson

Holmes

D. M.

Bendel

(2002). Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44(1), 14–20. https://journals.lww.com/joem/fulltext/2002/01000/stanford_presenteeism_scale__health_status_and.4.aspx

57.

Koopmans

Coffeng

J. K.

Bernaards

C. M.

Boot

C. R.

Hildebrandt

V. H.

De Vet

H. C.

Van Der Beek

A. J.

(2014). Responsiveness of the individual work performance questionnaire. BMC Public Health, 14(1), Article 513. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-513

58.

Korkmaz

Goksuluk

Zararsiz

(2014). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-031

59.

Kun

Takacs

Z. K.

Richman

M. J.

Griffiths

M. D.

Demetrovics

(2020). Work addiction and personality: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(4), 945–966. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00097

60.

Lehre

A.-C.

Hansen

Laake

(2009). Gender and the 2003 Quality Reform in higher education in Norway. Higher Education, 58, 585–597.

61.

Lord

F. M.

(1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203056615

62.

Loscalzo

Tziner

Shkoler

(2023). Heavy work investment, workaholism, servant leadership, and organizational outcomes: A study among Italian workers. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 39(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2023a7

63.

Mardia

K. V.

(1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334770

64.

Marsh

H. W.

Hocevar

(1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562

65.

Mazzetti

Vignoli

Schaufeli

W. B.

Guglielmi

(2019). Work addiction and presenteeism: The buffering role of managerial support. International Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12449

66.

Merino-Soto

Lozano-Huamán

Lima-Mendoza

Calderón de la Cruz

Juárez-García

Toledano-Toledano

(2022). Ultrashort Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3): A psychometric assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020890

67.

Molino

Kovalchuk

L. S.

Ghislieri

Spagnoli

(2022). Work addiction among employees and self-employed workers: An investigation based on the Italian version of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2607

68.

Morkevičiūtė

Endriulaitienė

(2024). Explaining work addiction through perceived behaviors of signiﬁcant others in a family and organization: Gender differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 64, 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12990

69.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In Wolman

B. B.

(Ed.), Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook (pp. 97–146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4

70.

Orlando

Thissen

(2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216000241003

71.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J.-Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

72.

Putnick

D. L.

Bornstein

M. H.

(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

73.

R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

74.

Revelle

(2024). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (Version 2.5.3)[R]. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych

75.

Robinson

B. E.

(1989). Workaholism: Hidden legacies of adult children. Health Communications.

76.

Robinson

B. E.

(1999). The work addiction risk test: Development of a tentative measure of workaholism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 199–210.

77.

Rogowska

A. M.

Zmaczyńska-Witek

Olejniczak

(2022). Depression and workaholism in undergraduates: Examining gender as a moderator. Journal of American College Health, 70(8), 2445–2453. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1865976

78.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.

79.

Rumpf

Achab

Billieux

Bowden-Jones

Carragher

Demetrovics

Higuchi

King

D. L.

Mann

Potenza

Saunders

J. B.

Abbott

Ambekar

Aricak

O. T.

Assanangkornchai

Bahar

Borges

Brand

Chan

E. M.

. . . Poznyak

(2018). Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective: Commentary on: A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution (van Rooij et al., 2018). Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(3), 556–561. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.59

80.

Salmela-Aro

Hietajärvi

Lonka

(2019). Work burnout and engagement profiles among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02254

81.

Salmela-Aro

Rantanen

Hyvönen

Tilleman

Feldt

(2011). Bergen Burnout Inventory: Reliability and validity among Finnish and Estonian managers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(6), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-010-0594-3

82.

Sanchez-Gomez

Bresó

(2020). In pursuit of work performance: Testing the contribution of emotional intelligence and burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 5373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155373

83.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Salanova

González-Romá

Bakker

A. B.

(2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

84.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Shimazu

Hakanen

Salanova

De Witte

(2019). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430

85.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Shimazu

Taris

T. W.

(2009). Being driven to work excessively hard: The evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural Research, 43(4), 320–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397109337239

86.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Taris

T. W.

Bakker

A. B.

(2006). Dr Jekyll or Mr Hyde? On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In Burke

R. J.

(Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 193–217). Edward Elgar Publishing.

87.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Taris

T. W.

Van Rhenen

(2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology, 57(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00285.x

88.

Shimazu

Schaufeli

W. B.

Kamiyama

Kawakami

(2015). Workaholism vs. work engagement: The two different predictors of future well-being and performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 18–23.

89.

Snir

Harpaz

(2012). Beyond workaholism: Towards a general model of heavy work investment. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.011

90.

Spagnoli

Haynes

N. J.

Kovalchuk

L. S.

Clark

M. A.

Buono

Balducci

(2020). Workload, workaholism, and job performance: Uncovering their complex relationship. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186536

91.

Spence

J. T.

Robbins

A. S.

(1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_15

92.

Steiger

J. H.

(1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245

93.

Wong

Yip

(2023). Validation of the ultra-short scale for measuring work engagement among social workers in Chinese contexts. International Journal of Social Welfare, 32(2), 241–255.

94.

Sun

Lam

L. W.

A. M. S.

(2023). Work addiction in Chinese white-collar workers: The psychometric properties of its measure and its comorbidity with general anxiety in network analysis. BMC Psychology, 11(1), Article 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01247-7

95.

Taris

T. W.

de Jonge

(2024). Workaholism: Taking stock and looking forward. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-111821-035514

96.

Toland

M. D.

(2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511332

97.

Towch

S. V.

Atroszko

P. A.

Pontes

H. M.

(2024). Exploring the relationship between work addiction and burnout. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 24, 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01397-8

98.

West

S. G.

McNeish

Savord

(2023). Model fit in structural equation modeling. In Hoyle

R. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (2nd ed., pp. 184–205). Guilford Press.

99.

Wickham

Averick

Bryan

Chang

McGowan

François

Grolemund

Hayes

Henry

Hester

Kuhn

Pedersen

Miller

Bache

Müller

Ooms

Robinson

Seidel

Spinu

. . .Yutani

(2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

100.

World Health Organization. (2025). ICD-11: International classification of diseases (11th revision). https://icd.who.int/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.43 MB

0.00 MB