Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Some key sources of motivation are likely to be primitive. As a way of assessing such sources of motivation and their links to personality, participants in three studies (total N = 808) were asked to choose animals that they would prefer to be, with all pairs contrasting predator and prey animals. Individuals who select predator animals more often may wish to interact with the environment in a self-serving and callous manner. In support of such thinking, Study 1 linked higher levels of predator self-identification to lower levels of agreeableness and interpersonal warmth. Study 2 extended this model by showing that wishing to be predator animals was linked to self-serving behavior in economic games. Study 3 found inverse relationships between predator preferences and daily agreeableness levels in both between-person and within-person analyses. The findings, in total, highlight a motivation-based orientation to the environment that is disagreeable and self-serving.

Keywords

motivation projective agreeableness social functioning psychopathy traits

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

Arad

(2004). If your mother were an animal, what animal would she be? Creating play-stories in family therapy: The Animal Attribution Story-Telling Technique (AASTT). Family Process, 43(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.04302009.x

Arbuckle

N. L.

Cunningham

W. A.

(2012). Understanding everyday psychopathy: Shared group identity leads to increased concern for others among undergraduates higher in psychopathy. Social Cognition, 30(5), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.5.564

Archer

(2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 249–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990951

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

W. T.

Kwong

J. Y. Y.

(2004). Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In Suleiman

Budescu

D. V.

Fischer

Messick

D. M.

(Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 71–98). Cambridge University Press.

Baity

M. R.

Hilsenroth

M. J.

(2002). Rorschach Aggressive Content (AgC) variable: A study of criterion validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7802_04

Balliet

Parks

Joireman

(2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(4), 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209105040

Banse

Messer

Fischer

(2015). Predicting aggressive behavior with the aggressiveness-IAT. Aggressive Behavior, 41(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21574

10.

Bornstein

R. F.

(2001). The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.18.1.2

11.

Bornstein

R. F.

(2007). Nomothetic psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(4), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.24.4.590

12.

Bornstein

R. F.

(2012). Rorschach score validation as a model for 21st-century personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627961

13.

Burt

S. A.

Donnellan

M. B.

(2009). Development and validation of the Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 35(5), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20314

14.

Buss

D. M.

(1990). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: An analysis of the negative component of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 22(9–10), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288234

15.

Carter

N. T.

Daniels

M. A.

Zickar

M. J.

(2013). Projective testing: Historical foundations and uses for human resources management. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 205–218.

16.

Church

A. T.

Katigbak

M. S.

Ching

C. M.

Zhang

Shen

Arias

R. M.

Rincon

B. C.

Morio

Tanaka-Matsumi

Takaoka

Mastor

K. A.

Roslan

N. A.

Ibanez-Reyes

Vargas-Flores

J. d. J.

Locke

K. D.

Reyes

J. A. S.

Wenmei

Ortiz

F. A.

Alvarez

J. M.

(2013). Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 922–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.002

17.

Crego

Widiger

T. A.

(2022). Core traits of psychopathy. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13(6), 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000550

18.

Denzinger

Backes

Job

Brandstätter

(2016). Age and gender differences in implicit motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.09.003

19.

Diehl

Owen

S. K.

Youngblade

L. M.

(2004). Agency and communion attributes in adults’ spontaneous self-representations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000226

20.

Docherty

Boxer

Huesmann

L. R.

O’Brien

Bushman

B. J.

(2016). Exploring primary and secondary variants of psychopathy in adolescence in detention and in the community. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45(5), 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.979934

21.

Drislane

L. E.

Patrick

C. J.

Sourander

Sillanmäki

Aggen

S. H.

Elonheimo

Parkkola

Multimäki

Kendler

K. S.

(2014). Distinct variants of extreme psychopathic individuals in society at large: Evidence from a population-based sample. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000060

22.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

23.

Engel

(2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7

24.

Fetterman

A. K.

Meier

B. P.

Robinson

M. D.

(2017). Dispositional properties of metaphor: The predictive power of the sweet taste metaphor for trait and daily prosociality. Journal of Individual Differences, 38(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000234

25.

Fetterman

A. K.

Wilkowski

B. M.

Robinson

M. D.

(2018). On feeling warm and being warm: Daily perceptions of physical warmth fluctuate with interpersonal warmth. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(5), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617712032

26.

Fleeson

(2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011

27.

Fleeson

Jayawickreme

(2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009

28.

Foulkes

Seara-Cardoso

Neumann

C. S.

Rogers

J. S. C.

Viding

(2014). Looking after number one: Associations between psychopathic traits and measures of social motivation and functioning in a community sample of males. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9381-2

29.

Frick

P. J.

Ray

J. V.

(2015). Evaluating callous-unemotional traits as a personality construct. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12114

30.

Furnham

Richards

S. C.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018

31.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26

32.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1999). A broad bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-order facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde

Deary

De Fruyt

Ostendorf

(Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.

33.

Graziano

W. G.

Tobin

R. M.

(2002). Agreeableness: Dimension of personality or social desirability artifact? Journal of Personality, 70(5), 695–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05021

34.

Gurtman

M. B.

(2009). Exploring personality with the interpersonal circumplex. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00172.x

35.

Gurtman

M. B.

Lee

D. L.

(2009). Sex differences in interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017085

36.

Hare

R. D.

(1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854896023001004

37.

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

Leist

Heydasch

(2013). It takes two: Honesty-humility and agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 598–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.008

38.

Hoyle

R. H.

Lynam

D. R.

Miller

J. D.

Pek

(2023). The questionable practice of partialing to refine scores on and inferences about measures of psychological constructs. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 19, 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071720-015436

39.

Hsu

Badura

K. L.

Newman

D. A.

Speech

M. E. P.

(2021). Gender, “masculinity,” and “femininity”: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in agency and communion. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 987–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000343

40.

Hunsley

Mash

E. J.

(2007). Evidence-based assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091419

41.

Hyde

J. S.

(2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

42.

James

L. R.

LeBreton

J. M.

(2010). Assessing aggression using conditional reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359279

43.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.

44.

Jones

D. N.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2011). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In Horowitz

L. M.

Strack

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–267). John Wiley & Sons.

45.

Kalliopuska

(1992). Hostility of asocial youth as measured by the TAT and Rorschach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74(2), 563–566. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.74.2.563-566

46.

Lee

Salekin

R. T.

(2010). Psychopathy in a noninstitutionalized sample: Differences in primary and secondary subtypes. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1(3), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019269

47.

Levenson

M. R.

(1992). Rethinking psychopthy.Theory & Psychology, 2(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354392021003

48.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

Wood

J. M.

Garb

H. N.

(2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.002

49.

Lima

S. L.

(2002). Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02393-X

50.

Locke

K. D.

(2015). Agentic and communal social motives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(10), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12201

51.

Lorah

(2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6, article number 8.

52.

Maas

C. J. M.

Hox

J. J.

(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86

53.

Markey

P. M.

Markey

C. N.

(2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16(4), 325–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191109340382

54.

Matranga

J. T.

(1976). The relationship between behavioral indices of aggression and hostile content on the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 40(2), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4002_3

55.

McCabe

K. O.

Fleeson

(2016). Are traits useful? Explaining trait manifestations as tools in the pursuit of goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039490

56.

McClelland

D. C.

(1951). Personality. William Sloane Associates. https://doi.org/10.1037/10790-000

57.

McClelland

D. C.

(1987). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690

58.

McClelland

D. C.

Koestner

Weinberger

(1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690

59.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). The Guilford Press.

60.

Meloy

J. R.

(2006). Empirical basis and forensic application of affective and predatory violence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(6–7), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01837.x

61.

Meyer

G. J.

Eblin

J. J.

(2012). An overview of the Roschach Personality Assessment System (R-PAS). Psychological Injury and Law, 5(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-012-9130-y

62.

Mihura

J. L.

Meyer

G. J.

Dumitrascu

Bombel

(2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 548–605. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029406

63.

Miller

J. D.

Lynam

D. R.

(2015). Understanding personality using the basic elements of personality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(5), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12170

64.

Moshagen

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

(2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111

65.

Murphy

R. O.

Ackermann

K. A.

(2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501745

66.

Nezlek

J. B.

(2007). A multilevel framework for understanding relationships among traits, states, situations and behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 21(6), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.640

67.

Nezlek

J. B.

(2012). Multilevel modeling for psychologists. In Cooper

Camic

P. M.

Long

D. L.

Panter

A. T.

Rindskopf

Sher

K. J.

(Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 219–241). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13621-011

68.

Patrick

C. J.

(2022). Psychopathy: Current knowledge and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 18, 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-012851

69.

Penzel

I. B.

Bair

Liu

Robinson

M. D.

(2021). The Revised Animal Preference Test: An implicit probe of tendencies toward psychopathy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), 3710–3731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518777553

70.

Pervin

L. A.

(1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0502_1

71.

Robinson

M. D.

Asad

M. R.

Irvin

R. L.

(2024). Action over feeling: The Revised Animal Preference Test and callous-unemotional functioning. Motivation and Emotion, 48(4), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10080-3

72.

Robinson

M. D.

Bair

J. L.

Liu

Scott

M. J.

Penzel

I. B.

(2017). Of tooth and claw: Predator self-identifications mediate gender differences in interpersonal arrogance. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 77(3–4), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0706-y

73.

Robinson

M. D.

Lindquist

J. A.

Irvin

R. L.

(2024). Open-hearted: Preferences for openness in the agreeableness domain. Journal of Personality, 92(2), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12829

74.

Robinson

M. D.

Irvin

R. L.

Asad

M. R.

(2025). In the beast mode: Predator self-identifications as a model of disagreeable functioning [dataset]. https://osf.io/7g59u/?view_only=0a18c16008b141fa9198a16fe6b43ae5

75.

Rojas

E. B.

Tuber

S. B.

(1991). The Animal Preference Test and its relationship to behavioral problems in young children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_16

76.

Scherbaum

C. A.

Ferreter

J. M.

(2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107308906

77.

Sevillano

Fiske

S. T.

(2016). Warmth and competence in animals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(5), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12361

78.

Sherman

E. D.

Lynam

D. R.

(2017). Psychopathy and low communion: An overlooked and underappreciated core feature. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000203

79.

Simons

D. J.

(2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514755

80.

Singer

J. D.

(1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(4), 323–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165280

81.

Skeem

Johansson

Andershad

Kerr

Louden

J. E.

(2007). Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(2), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.395

82.

Thielmann

Böhm

Hilbig

B. E.

(2015). Different games for different motives: Comment on Haesevoets, Folmer, and Van Hiel (2015). European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 506–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2007

83.

Thielmann

Böhm

Ott

Hilbig

B. E.

(2021). Economic games: An introduction and guide for research. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), ArtID 19004. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.19004

84.

Thielmann

Spadaro

Balliet

(2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217

85.

Tuber

(2012). Understanding personality through projective testing. Jason Aronson.

86.

Van Krevelen

D. A

. (1956). The use of Pigem’s test with children. Journal of Projective Techniques, 20, 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853126.1956.10380694

87.

Viding

McCrory

(2019). Towards understanding atypical social affiliation in psychopathy. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(5), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30049-5

88.

Viglione

D. J.

Blume-Marcovici

A. C.

Miller

H. L.

Giromini

Meyer

(2012). An inter-rater reliability study for the Rorschach Performance Assessment System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(6), 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.684118

89.

Waller

Corbett

Raine

Wagner

N. J.

Broussard

Edmonds

Reardon

Jones

Itkin-Ofer

Schell

Neumann

C. S.

(2021). Reduced sensitivity to affiliation and psychopathic traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(5), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000423

90.

Waller

Wagner

(2019). The Sensitivity to Threat and Affiliative Reward (STAR) model and the development of callous-unemotional traits. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.10.005

91.

West

S. G.

Ryu

Kwok

Cham

(2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79(1), 2–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00681.x

92.

Wiggins

J. S.

Broughton

(1991). A geometric interpretation of personality scales. European Journal of Personality, 5(5), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410050503

93.

Wiggins

J. S.

Trapnell

Phillips

(1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2304_8

94.

Winter

D. G.

John

O. P.

Stewart

A. J.

Klohnen

E. C.

Duncan

L. E.

(1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.230

95.

Zhao

Smillie

L. D.

(2015). The role of interpersonal skills in social decision making: Exploring sources of behavioral heterogeneity in economic games. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314553709

In the Beast Mode: Predator Self-Identifications as a Model of Disagreeable Functioning

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References