The NIH Toolbox® for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) is a brief neuropsychological assessment tool created as part of the NIH Neuroscience Blueprint. Since its inception, NIHTB-CB has been widely used in a variety of clinical and research settings, including large-scale epidemiological studies. The NIHTB-CB was recently updated and re-normed to Version 3 (V3). We describe the approach to establish normative reference values. The NIHTB-CB tests were administered to a large English-speaking sample of n = 3,904 (average age = 25.7 years, 52.1% female) individuals from the U.S. population, stratified by age, race and ethnicity, sex assigned at birth, and education level within the four U.S. census regions. Normative data were raked via iterative proportional fitting (e.g., by sex assigned at birth, race, ethnicity, and educational attainment nested within geographic region) to derive sampling weights that match the demographic proportions from the U.S. Census targets. Through regression-based continuous norming and bootstrap techniques, age-adjusted and age-and-education-adjusted normative scores were created for individual measure-level and composite scores.
CasalettoK. B.UmlaufA.BeaumontJ.GershonR.SlotkinJ.AkshoomoffN.HeatonR. K. (2015). Demographically corrected normative standards for the English version of the NIH toolbox cognition battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21(5), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715000351
4.
DeBellM.KrosnickJ. A. (2009). Computing weights for American national election study survey data (ANES Technical Report series no. nes012427). American National Election Studies.
5.
delCacho-TenaA.ChristB. R.Arango-LasprillaJ. C.PerrinP. B.RiveraD.Olabarrieta-LandaL. (2024). Normative data estimation in neuropsychological tests: A systematic review. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 39(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad084
6.
DelisD. C.KramerJ. H.KaplanE.OberB. A. (2017). California Verbal Learning Test, Third Edition (CVLT-3). The Psychological Corporation.
EmbretsonS. E.ReiseS. P. (2013). Item response theory. Psychology Press.
9.
FarmerR. L.McGillR. J.DombrowskiS. C.McClainM. B.HarrisB.LockwoodA. B.PowellS. L.PynnC.Smith-KellenS.LoethenE.BensonN. F.StinnettT. A. (2020). Teleassessment with children and adolescents during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and beyond: Practice and policy implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(5), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000349
FlynnJ. R. (1998). WAIS-III and WISC-III gains in the United States from 1972 to 1995: How to compensate for obsolete norms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86(3, Pt 2), 1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.3c.1231
12.
FlynnJ. R. (2000). The hidden history of IQ and special education: Can the problems be solved?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.191
13.
FoxR. S.ZhangM.AmagaiS.BassardA.DworakE. M.HanY. C.KassanitsJ.MillerC. H.NowinskiC. J.GiellaA. K.StoegerJ. N.SwantekK.HookJ. N.GershonR. C. (2022). Uses of the NIH Toolbox® in clinical samples: A scoping review. Neurology Clinical Practice, 12(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200060
GershonR. C.WagsterM. V.HendrieH. C.FoxN. A.CookK. F.NowinskiC. J. (2013). NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function. Neurology, 80(11 Suppl 3), S2–S6. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e5f
16.
HoE. H.HanY. C.LaForteE.KaatA. J.EceB.DworakE. M.OlsenJ. B.HookJ.GershonR. (2025). Development and validation of the NIH Toolbox version 3.0 for children [Manuscript under submission, OSF Preprint: https://osf.io/2w83f_v1]. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University.
17.
International Test Commission. (2001). International guidelines for test use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 93–114.
18.
KaltonG.Flores-CervantesI. (2003). Weighting methods. Journal of Official Statistics, 19, 81–97.
19.
KiselicaA. M.KarrJ. E.MikulaC. M.RanumR. M.BengeJ. F.MedinaL. D.WoodsS. P. (2024). Recent advances in neuropsychological test interpretation for clinical practice. Neuropsychology Review, 34(2), 637–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09596-1
20.
LaForteE. M.DaileyD.McGrewK. S. (2025). Woodcock-Johnson V technical manual. Riverside Assessments, LLC.
LenhardW.LenhardA. (2020). Improvement of norm score quality via regression-based continuous norming. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420928457
23.
ManlyJ. J. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of separate norms for African Americans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19(2), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040590945346
24.
MardenJ. R.Tchetgen TchetgenE. J.KawachiI.GlymourM. M. (2017). Contribution of socioeconomic status at 3 life-course periods to late-life memory function and decline: Early and late predictors of dementia risk. American Journal of Epidemiology, 186(7), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx155
25.
MatherM. A.HoE. H.BedjetiK.Karpouzian-RogersT.RogalskiE. J.GershonR.WeintraubS. (2024). Measuring multidimensional aspects of health in the oldest old using the NIH Toolbox: Results from the ARMADA study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 39(5), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad105
26.
McGrewK. S.LaForteE. M.SchrankF. A. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV technical manual. Riverside Assessments, LLC.
27.
MungasD.HeatonR.TulskyD.ZelazoP. D.SlotkinJ.BlitzD.LaiJ. S.GershonR. (2014). Factor structure, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(6), 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000307
28.
MungasD.WidamanK.ZelazoP. D.TulskyD.HeatonR. K.SlotkinJ.BlitzD. L.GershonR. C. (2013). National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIH Toolbox CB): Validation for children between 3 and 15 years: VII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Factor structure for 3 to 15 year olds. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(4), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12037
29.
OosterhuisH. E.van der ArkL. A.SijtsmaK. (2016). Sample size requirements for traditional and regression-based norms. Assessment, 23(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115580638
30.
PietschnigJ.VoracekM. (2015). One century of global IQ gains: A formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909-2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 282–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615577701
31.
PossinK. L.TsoyE.WindonC. C. (2021). Perils of race-based norms in cognitive testing: The case of former NFL players. JAMA Neurology, 78(4), 377–378. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4763
32.
PriceJ. C.LeeJ. J.SaraiyaN.LeiS.MintzC. D. (2023). An update on NIH programs relevant to child brain health research: ECHO, ABCD, HBCD, and MIRA. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 35(1), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000875
33.
RentzD. M.AmariglioR. E.BeckerJ. A.FreyM.OlsonL. E.FrisheK.CarmasinJ.MayeJ. E.JohnsonK. A.SperlingR. A. (2011). Face-name associative memory performance is related to amyloid burden in normal elderly. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2776–2783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.006
34.
RoidG. H.PomplunM. (2012). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, fifth edition. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 249–268). The Guilford Press.
35.
ShonoY.EceB.HoE. H.KaatA. J.La ForteE. M.AyturkE.GershonR. (2024). A comparison of scoring algorithms for the NIH Toolbox Executive Function Tasks in a U.S. norming sample. Psychological Assessment, 36(12), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001350
36.
TimmermanM. E.VonckenL.AlbersC. J. (2021). A tutorial on regression-based norming of psychological tests with GAMLSS. Psychological Methods, 26(3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000348
37.
TorresV. A.AshfordJ. M.WrightE.XuJ.ZhangH.MerchantT. E.ConklinH. M. (2021). The impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on cognitive outcomes following radiotherapy for pediatric brain tumors: A prospective, longitudinal trial. Neuro-Oncology, 23(7), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab018
38.
TrahanL. H.StuebingK. K.FletcherJ. M.HiscockM. (2014). The Flynn effect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1332–1360. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037173
VictorsonD.ManlyJ.Wallner-AllenK.FoxN.PurnellC.HendrieH.HavlikR.HarnissM.MagasiS.CorreiaH.GershonR. (2013). Using the NIH Toolbox in special populations: Considerations for assessment of pediatric, geriatric, culturally diverse, non–English-speaking, and disabled individuals. Neurology, 80(11 Suppl 3), S13–S19. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e26
44.
WangK.FangY.ZhengR.ZhaoX.WangS.LuJ.WangW.NingG.XuY.BiY. (2024). Associations of socioeconomic status and healthy lifestyle with incident dementia and cognitive decline: Two prospective cohort studies. eClinicalMedicine, 76, 102831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102831
45.
WeiX.McKinlayJ. D.HardingJ. E.WouldesT. A.RogersJ.BrownT. L.FrankeN. (2025). NIH toolbox for assessment of neurocognitive, motor and emotional-behavioral function in childhood: A systematic review. Child Neuropsychology, 31(6), 948–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2447444
46.
WeintraubS.DikmenS. S.HeatonR. K.TulskyD. S.ZelazoP. D.BauerP. J.CarlozziN. E.SlotkinJ.BlitzD.Wallner-AllenK.FoxN. A.BeaumontJ. L.MungasD.NowinskiC. J.RichlerJ.DeocampJ. A.AndersonJ. E.ManlyJ. J.BoroshB.. . . GershonR. C. (2013). Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology, 80(11 Suppl 3), S54–S64. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872ded
WechslerD. (2012). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (4th ed.). Pearson.
50.
WechslerD. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition (WISC-V). Pearson.
51.
WoodS. N.PyaN.SäfkenB. (2016). Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(516), 1548–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986
52.
ZacharyR. A.GorsuchR. L. (1985). Continuous norming: Implications for the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(1), 86–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
