The quality of family involvement is recognized as a crucial factor that impacts a wide range of child developmental outcomes. In this cross-sectional study, we focused on the Family Involvement Questionnaire-Short Form (FIQ-SF), a widely used parent report that measures family involvement through a three-dimensional structure (school-based involvement, home–school conferencing, home-based involvement), and gathered validity evidence from families of 3,860 preschoolers in China. The results of factor analyses and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis provided empirical support for the three-dimensional structure underlying the FIQ-SF and the equivalence of this measure across gender groups of preschoolers. Results from the multidimensional graded response model revealed that the FIQ-SF items displayed adequate item-level psychometric characteristics. However, one item on the home-based involvement dimension exhibited slight differential item functioning across gender groups of preschoolers. Findings were discussed in comparison to existing validation studies of the FIQ-SF and recommendations for future research were provided accordingly.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
3.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
4.
BoS. (2018). Son preference, children’s gender and parents’ time allocation: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50(45), 4830–4846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1467555
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
7.
Bulotsky-ShearerR. J.BouzaJ.BichayK.FernandezV. A.HernandezP. G. (2016). Extending the validity of the Family Involvement Questionnaire-short form for culturally and linguistically diverse families from low-income backgrounds. Psychology in the Schools, 53(9), 911–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21953
8.
ChalmersR. P. (2012). Mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06
9.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
10.
CheungC. S.PomerantzE. M. (2011). Parents’ involvement in children’s learning in the United States and China: Implications for children’s academic and emotional adjustment. Child Development, 82(3), 932–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01582.x
11.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
12.
de AyalaR. J. (1994). The influence of multidimensionality on the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169401800205
13.
DubeauD.CoutuS.LavigueurS. (2013). Links between different measures of mother/father involvement and child social adjustment. Early Child Development and Care, 183(6), 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2012.723442
14.
El NokaliN. E.BachmanH. J.Votruba-DrzalE. (2010). Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school. Child Development, 81(3), 988–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01447.x
15.
EmbretsonS. E.ReiseS. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
EnglundM. M.LucknerA. E.WhaleyG. J. L.EgelandB. (2004). Children’s achievement in early elementary school: Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, expectations, and quality of assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.723
FantuzzoJ.GadsdenV.LiF.SproulF.McDermottP.HightowerD.MinneyA. (2013). Multiple dimensions of family engagement in early childhood education: Evidence for a short form of the Family Involvement Questionnaire. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 734–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.07.001
19.
FantuzzoJ.McWayneC.PerryM. A.ChildsS. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086262
20.
FantuzzoJ.TigheE.ChildsS. (2000). Family Involvement Questionnaire: A multivariate assessment of family participation in early childhood education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.367
21.
GarbaczS. A.HallG. J.YoungK.LeeY.YoungblomR. K.HoulihanD. D. (2021). Validation study of the Family Involvement Questionnaire-Elementary Version with families in Belize. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(3), 238–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419862857
22.
GarbaczS. A.McDowallP. S.SchaughencyE.SheridanS. M.WelchG. W. (2015). A multidimensional examination of parent involvement across child and parent characteristics. The Elementary School Journal, 115(3), 384–406. https://doi.org/10.1086/680325
23.
GarbaczS. A.SheridanS. M. (2011). A multidimensional examination of New Zealand family involvement in education. School Psychology International, 32(6), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311403034
24.
HillN. E.TaylorL. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00298.x
25.
JezierskiS.WallG. (2019). Changing understandings and expectations of parental involvement in education. Gender and Education, 31(7), 822–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1332340
26.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package version 0.5-6). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
27.
KimS. W. (2020). Meta-analysis of parental involvement and achievement in East Asian countries. Education and Urban Society, 52(2), 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124519842654
28.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
29.
LauE. Y. H.LiH.RaoN. (2011). Parental involvement and children’s readiness for school in China. Educational Research, 53(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2011.552243
30.
LittleT. D. (2024). Longitudinal structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
31.
LiuQ.LiX. (2019). Revision of Family Involvement Questionnaire-Short Form in parents of preschool children in China. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(1), 49–53.
32.
LiuY. (2022). Research on the prediction of parent-teacher relationship in kindergarten on teacher-child relationship: The mediating effects of parent involvement [Unpublished master’s thesis,. Northeast Normal University].
33.
MaX.ShenJ.KrennH. Y.HuS.YuanJ. (2016). A meta-analysis of the relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during early childhood education and elementary education. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 771–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9351-1
34.
ManzP. H.FantuzzoJ. W.PowerT. J. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of family involvement among urban elementary students. Journal of School Psychology, 42(6), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.08.002
35.
McWayneC.HamptonV.FantuzzoJ.CohenH. L.SekinoY. (2004). A multivariate examination of parent involvement and the social and academic competencies of urban kindergarten children. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10163
36.
McWayneC. M.ManzP. H.Ginsburg-BlockM. D. (2015). Examination of the Family Involvement Questionnaire-Early Childhood (FIQ-EC) with low-income, Latino families of young children. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 3(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2014.950439
37.
MeadeA. W.JohnsonE. C.BraddyP. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
41.
SeginerR. (2006). Parents’ educational involvement: A developmental ecology perspective. Parenting: Science and Practice, 6(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327922par0601_1
42.
SvetinaD.RutkowskiL.RutkowskiD. (2020). Multiple-Group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
TorresN.VeríssimoM.MonteiroL.RibeiroO.SantosA. J. (2014). Domains of father involvement, social competence and problem behavior in preschool children. Journal of Family Studies, 20(3), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2014.11082006
45.
WangW. (2005). Son preference and educational opportunities of children in China—“I wish you were a boy!”. Gender Issues, 22, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-005-0012-4
46.
WangW.LiuX.DongY.BaiY.WangS.ZhangL. (2020). Son preference, eldest son preference, and educational attainment: Evidence from Chinese families. Journal of Family Issues, 41(5), 636–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19874091
47.
WangY.ZhouY.JiangY.LiH.LiuX. (2022). Are parents satisfied with China’s Puhui early childhood education? Evidence from a national validation study. Early Education and Development, 34(6), 1458–1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2122669
48.
WoodN. D.Akloubou GnonhosouD. C.BowlingJ. (2015). Combining parallel and exploratory factor analysis in identifying relationship scales in secondary data. Marriage & Family Review, 51(5), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1059785
49.
WuX.LiuC.ZouS.HouF. (2018). Psychometric properties of the adolescence revision of Parental Involvement Behavior Questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(4), 647–651.
50.
XiaX.HackettR. K.WebsterL. (2020). Chinese parental involvement and children’s school readiness: The moderating role of parenting style. Early Education and Development, 31(2), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1643439
51.
XiaX.HackettR. K.WebsterL. (2021). A multidimensional examination of Chinese family involvement in early childhood education: Validation of the Chinese version of the Family Involvement Questionnaire. International Journal of Early Years Education, 29(2), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1742672
52.
ZhengC.YuY.LuJ.HouY.LiK. (2024). Has the COVID-19 pandemic widened the urban-rural gap in early child development in China? Evidence from the rural side. Early Education and Development, 35(2), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2146386
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
