The posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5; PCL-5) was designed and validated to track symptoms over the past month (PCL-5-M), yet an untested ad hoc weekly version (PCL-5-W) is commonly used to track changes during treatment. We used archival data of clinical trials for the treatment of PTSD in veterans to assess the construct validity of PCL-5-W. Both PCL-5-M and PCL-5-W were found to have configural measurement invariance across four consecutive administrations. The results also indicated at least partial metric and scalar invariance for each version. The reliability estimates of PCL-5-M and PCL-5-W at each time point were equivalent. However, we found a discrepancy with regard to concurrent validity; correlations with the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire may be meaningfully different between PCL-5-M and PCL-5-W. Nevertheless, overall, the results suggest that PCL-5-W can be validly used to assess PTSD symptoms over time, but factor scores may need to be tracked alongside total scores to address validity concerns.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
ArmourC.TsaiJ.DurhamT. A.CharakR.BiehnT. L.ElhaiJ. D.PietrzakR. H. (2015). Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 61, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012
4.
AwangZ. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation modelling. Bandar Baru Bangi, MPWS Rich Resources.
5.
BauerD. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 507. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077
6.
BockhopF.ZeldovichM.CunitzK.Van PraagD.van der VlegelM.BeissbarthT.HagmayerY.von SteinbuechelN. (2022). Measurement invariance of six language versions of the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 in civilians after traumatic brain injury. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 16571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20170-2
7.
BoehmeB. A.ShieldsR. E.CarletonR. N.AsmundsonG. J. (2023). Factor structure and factorial invariance of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 in public safety personnel: Results from a large and diverse sample. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001601
8.
BonifayW. E.ReiseS. P.ScheinesR.MeijerR. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.938596
9.
BovinM. J.MarxB. P.WeathersF. W.GallagherM. W.RodriguezP.SchnurrP. P.KeaneT. M. (2016). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000254
10.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
11.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
12.
ByllesbyB. M.PalmieriP. A. (2023). A bifactor model of general and specific PTSD symptom change during treatment. Assessment, 30(8), 2595–2604. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231156646
13.
ChengP.XuL.-Z.ZhengW.-H.NgR. M. K.ZhangL.LiL.-J.LiW.-H. (2020). Psychometric property study of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in Chinese healthcare workers during the outbreak of corona virus disease 2019. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.038
14.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(3), 316–336.
15.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
ContractorA. A.CaldasS. V.DolanM.LagdonS.ArmourC. (2018). PTSD’s factor structure and measurement invariance across subgroups with differing count of trauma types. Psychiatry Research, 264, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.065
17.
ContractorA. A.CaldasS. V.DolanM.NatesanP.WeissN. H. (2019). Invariance of the construct of posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(2), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22389
18.
DeVonH. A.BlockM. E.Moyle-WrightP.ErnstD. M.HaydenS. J.LazzaraD. J.SavoyS. M.Kostas-PolstonE. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
19.
DienerE.NorthcottR.ZyphurM. J.WestS. G. (2022). Beyond experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1101–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211037670
20.
Drake-BrooksM. M.HinksonK. D.Jr.OsteenP.BryanC. J. (2020). Examining the DSM-5 latent structures of posttraumatic stress disorder in a national sample of student veterans. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102262
21.
EidM. (2020). Multi-faceted constructs in abnormal psychology: Implications of the bifactor S-1 model for individual clinical assessment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(7), 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00624-9
22.
EidM.GeiserC.KochT.HeeneM. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000083
23.
ElhaiJ. D.BiehnT. L.ArmourC.KlopperJ. J.FruehB. C.PalmieriP. A. (2011). Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD’s D1–D3 symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(3), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.04.007
24.
FoaE. B. (2011). Prolonged exposure therapy: Past, present, and future. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 1043–1047.
25.
FoaE. B.HembreeE.RothbaumB. O. (2007). Prolonged exposure therapy for PTSD: Emotional processing of traumatic experiences therapist guide. Oxford University Press.
26.
ForkusS. R.RaudalesA. M.RafiuddinH. S.WeissN. H.MessmanB. A.ContractorA. A. (2023). The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM–5: A systematic review of existing psychometric evidence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 30(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000111
27.
FoxP. T.SalinasF.RoacheJ. D.UnzuetaM.MintzJ.LitzB. T.Young-McCaughanS.BrundigeA.KeaneT. M.PetersonA. L., for the Consortium to Alleviate PTSD. (2019, October23–24). Image-guided, robotically delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (irTMS) for combat-related PTSD: Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial [Paper presentation]. San Antonio Combat PTSD Conference, San Antonio, TX, United States.
28.
GorsuchR. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future, 195(216), 60–70.
30.
HansenN. B.LambertM. J.FormanE. M. (2002). The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329
31.
HayesA. F.CouttsJ. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimatingreliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
32.
HolderN.ShinerB.LiY.MaddenE.NeylanT. C.SealK. H.LujanC.PattersonO. V.DuVallS. L.MaguenS. (2020). Cognitive processing therapy for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: What is the median effective dose?Journal of Affective Disorders, 273, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.04.030
33.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
34.
Jenkins-GuarnieriM.McEuinC.SmolenskiD.HoseyR.MacobinB.PrinsA. (2023). Factor structure and psychometric performance of the PCL-5 in a clinical sample of veterans seeking treatment in a VA PTSD outpatient clinic. Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001208
35.
JonesR. N. (2019). Differential item functioning and its relevance to epidemiology. Current Epidemiology Reports, 6, 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-019-00194-5
36.
KeaneT. M.RubinA.LachowiczM.BriefD.EnggasserJ. L.RoyM.HermosJ.HelmuthE.RosenbloomD. (2014). Temporal stability of DSM–5 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in a problem-drinking sample. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037133
37.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
38.
LakensD. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
39.
LitzB. T. (2023). It is time to flip the script and leverage the point of care to discover ways of improving treatment outcomes for posttraumatic stress disorder: Commentary on “A sobering look at treatment effectiveness of military-related posttraumatic stress disorder” (Levi et al., 2021). Clinical Psychological Science, 11(2), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702622110106
40.
Pereira-LimaK.LoureiroS. R.BolsoniL. M.Apolinario da SilvaT. D.OsórioF. L. (2019). Psychometric properties and diagnostic utility of a Brazilian version of the PCL-5 (complete and abbreviated versions). European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1), 1581020. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1581020
41.
PetersonA. L.BlountT. H.FoaE. B.BrownL. A.McLeanC. P.MintzJ.SchobitzR. P.DeBeerB. R.MignognaJ.FinaB. A.EvansW. R.SynettS.Hall-ClarkB. N.RentzT. O.SchraderC.YarvisJ. S.DondanvilleK. A.HansenH.JacobyV. M.. . . KeaneT. M., for the Consortium to Alleviate PTSD. (2023). Massed versus intensive outpatient prolonged exposure for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 6(1), e2249422. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49422
42.
RainesA. M.ClaussK. E.SeidlerD.AllanN. P.ElhaiJ. D.VasterlingJ. J.ConstansJ. I.MaieritschK. P.FranklinC. L. (2024). A bifactor evaluation of self-report and clinician-administered measures of PTSD in veterans. Assessment, 31, 1674–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241229568
43.
RasmussenA.VerkuilenJ.JayawickremeN.WuZ.McCluskeyS. T. (2019). When did posttraumatic stress disorder get so many factors? Confirmatory factor models since DSM–5. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618809370
44.
ReiseS. P.ScheinesR.WidamanK. F.HavilandM. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
45.
ResickP. A.MonsonC. M.ChardK. M. (2016). Cognitive processing therapy for PTSD: A comprehensive manual. Guilford Publications.
46.
ResickP. A.WachenJ. S.DondanvilleK. A.LoSavioS. T.Young-McCaughanS.YarvisJ. S.PruiksmaK. E.BlankenshipA.JacobyV.PetersonA. L.MintzJ., & STRONG STAR Consortium. (2021). Variable-length cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in active duty military: Outcomes and predictors. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 141, 103846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.103846
47.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016a). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
48.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
49.
SchmittT. A.SassD. A.ChappelleW.ThompsonW. (2018). Selecting the “best” factor structure and moving measurement validation forward: An illustration. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1449116
50.
SimmsL. J.WatsonD.DoebbellingB. N. (2002). Confirmatory factor analyses of posttraumatic stress symptoms in deployed and nondeployed veterans of the Gulf War. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(4), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.637
51.
SloanD. M.MarxB. P.ResickP. A.Young-McCaughanS.DondanvilleK. A.StraudC. L.MintzJ.LitzB. T.PetersonA. L., for STRONG STAR Consortium. (2022). Effect of written exposure therapy vs cognitive processing therapy on increasing treatment efficiency among military service members with posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized noninferiority trial. JAMA Network Open, 5(1), e2140911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40911
52.
StuckyB. D.EdelenM. O. (2014). Using hierarchical IRT models to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. In ReiseS. P.RevickiD. A. (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory modeling (pp. 183–206). Routledge.
53.
StulzN.LutzW. (2007). Multidimensional patterns of change in outpatient psychotehrapy: The phase model revisted. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(9), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20397
54.
TaylorD. J.PruiksmaK. E.MintzJ.SlavishD. C.Wardle-PinkstonS.DietchJ. R.DondanvilleK. A.Young-McCaughanS.NicholsonK. L.LitzB. T.KeaneT. M.PetersonA. L.ResickP. A., & Consortium to Alleviate PTSD. (2023). Treatment of comorbid sleep disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder in US active duty military personnel: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 36, 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22939
55.
Trizano-HermosillaI.AlvaradoJ. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
56.
TsaiJ.Harpaz-RotemI.ArmourC.SouthwickS. M.KrystalJ. H.PietrzakR. H. (2014). Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76(5), 4513. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14m09091
57.
WangL.CaoX.CaoC.FangR.YangH.ElhaiJ. D. (2017). Factor structure of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in trauma-exposed adolescents: Examining stability across time. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 52, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.07.001
58.
WeathersF. W.BovinM. J.LeeD. J.SloanD. M.SchnurrP. P.KaloupekD. G.KeaneT. M.MarxB. P. (2018). The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM–5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychological Assessment, 30(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000486
59.
WeathersF. W.LitzB.HermanD.HuskaJ.KeaneT. (1993, October24–27). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Proceedings of the annual convention of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TX, United States.
60.
WeathersF. W.LitzB. T.KeaneT. M.PalmieriP. A.MarxB. P.SchnurrP. P. (2013). The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Scale available from the National Center for PTSD. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
61.
WetzelC. G.WilsonT. D.KortJ. (1981). The halo effect revisited: Forewarned is not forearmed. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(81)90049-4
62.
WortmannJ. H.JordanA. H.WeathersF. W.ResickP. A.DondanvilleK. A.Hall-ClarkB.FoaE. B.Young-McCaughanS.YarvisJ. S.HembreeE. A.MintzJ.PetersonA. L.LitzB. T., on behalf of the STRONG STAR Consortium. (2016). Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000260
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
