To refine the 23-item chronic Hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) using the modified Delphi method and Rasch model analysis, this study conducted a secondary data analysis on 578 chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The preliminary evaluation of the item’s importance of the original CHBQOL and the final review of the short form of CHBQOL (CHBQOL-SF) were collected by the Delphi method. A bi-factor model was estimated and Rasch analysis with partial credit model was performed on each domain of the CHBQOL. Six items were suggested to remove based on the Delphi results. The fit of the bi-factor model was acceptable (RMSEA = 0.040; CFI = 0.983; TLI = 0.965). Disordered thresholds were initially found on three out of five items in Somatic symptoms, and four out of six items in Social stigma. Uniform differential item functioning was observed for three items for age group, two items for gender, and one item each for different ALT levels and HBV-DNA levels. Finally, the 10-item CHBQOL-SF retained the four-dimensional structure of the original instrument. The 10 items fit the Rasch model well and response options were set reasonably. The 10-item CHBQOL-SF would offer a brief and easily administrative CHB-specific patient-reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice and population studies.
AminL.RosenbaumP.BarrR.SungL.KlaassenR. J.DixD. B.KlassenA. (2012). Rasch analysis of the PedsQL: An increased understanding of the properties of a rating scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(10), 1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.014
BatchelderL.FoxD.PotterC. M.PetersM.JonesK.ForderJ. E.FitzpatrickR. (2020). Rasch analysis of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18, 375. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01626-3
4.
BaylissM. S.GandekB.BungayK. M.SuganoD.HsuM. A.WareJ. E. (1998). A questionnaire to assess the generic and disease-specific health outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 7(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008884805251
5.
BjornerJ. B.PetersenM. A.GroenvoldM.AaronsonN.Ahlner-ElmqvistM.ArrarasJ. I.BrédartA.FayersP.JordhoyM.SprangersM.WatsonM.YoungT., & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. (2004). Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale. Quality of Life Research, 13(10), 1683–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-7866-x
CanoS.BarrettL.ZajicekJ.HobartJ. (2011). Beyond the reach of traditional analyses: Using Rasch to evaluate the DASH in people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 17(2), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458510385269
8.
ChenG.ChenP. (2019). Explanatory item response theory models: Theory and application. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(5), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00937
9.
ChenX.GuM.HeW.LiuH.LiJ.MoC.XuQ. (2013). Evaluation of life quality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients using item response theory. Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, 20(18), 1380–1384.
10.
ChengS. T.LeungE. M. F.ChanT. W. S. (2014). Physical and social activities mediate the associations between social network types and ventilatory function in Chinese older adults. Health Psychology, 33(6), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000026
11.
DeMarsC. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press.
12.
EvonD. M.LinH. S.KhaliliM.FontanaR. J.YimC.WahedA. S.FriedM. W.HoofnagleJ. H., & Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN). (2020). Patient-reported outcomes in a large North American cohort living with chronic hepatitis B virus: A cross-sectional analysis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 51(4), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15618
13.
FayersP. M.MachinD. (2016). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (3rd ed.). John Wiley.
14.
FinkA.KosecoffJ.ChassinM.BrookR. H. (1984). Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health, 74(9), 979–983. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.74.9.979
15.
Galindo-GarreF.HidalgoM. D.GuileraG.PinoO.RojoJ. E.Gómez-BenitoJ. (2015). Modeling the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II using non-parametric item response models. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1462
16.
GBD 2017 Cirrhosis Collaborators. (2020). The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 5(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30349-8
Global Burden of Disease Liver Cancer Collaboration, AkinyemijuT.AberaS.AhmedM.AlamN.AlemayohuM. A.AllenC.Al-RaddadiR.Alvis-GuzmanN.AmoakoY.ArtamanA.AyeleT. A.BaracA.BensenorI.BerhaneA.BhuttaZ.Castillo-RivasJ.ChitheerA.ChoiJ. Y.CowieB.. . . FitzmauriceC. (2017). The burden of primary liver cancer and underlying etiologies from 1990 to 2015 at the global, regional, and national level: Results from the global burden of disease study 2015. JAMA Oncology, 3(12), 1683–1691. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055
19.
GuilleminF.RatA. C.GoetzC.SpitzE.PouchotJ.CosteJ. (2016). The Mini-OAKHQOL for knee and hip osteoarthritis quality of life was obtained following recent shortening guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.010
20.
HaysR. D.MoralesL. S.ReiseS. P. (2000). Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38(Suppl. 9), II28–II42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007
21.
HibbardJ. H.MahoneyE. R.StockardJ.TuslerM. (2005). Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Services Research, 40(6, Part. 1), 1918–1930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x
22.
HoleyE. A.FeeleyJ. L.DixonJ.WhittakerV. J. (2007). An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-52
23.
KongZ.LiangN.YangG. L.ZhangZ.LiuY.YangY.LiuY. X.WangQ. G.ZhangF.ZhangH. Y.NikolovaD.JakobsenJ. C.GluudC.LiuJ. P. (2019). Acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8(8), CD013107. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013107.pub2
24.
KongY.ZhangF. (2009). Research on Chinese citizens’ scientific quality measurement methods based on item response theory. Science and Technology Management Research, 29(04), 280–283.
25.
KosinskiM.BaylissM. S.BjornerJ. B.WareJ. E.Jr.GarberW. H.BatenhorstA.CadyR.DahlöfC. G.DowsonA.TepperS. (2003). A Six-Item Short-Form Survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6TM. Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 963–974. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4038952
26.
LauJ. T. F.WuX.WuA. M. S.WangZ.MoP. K. H. (2018). Relationships between illness perception and post-traumatic growth among newly diagnosed HIV-positive men who have sex with men in China. AIDS and Behavior, 22(6), 1885–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1874-7
27.
LeeE. H.LeeY. W.KangH. J. (2022). Psychometric properties of the revised Diabetes Knowledge Test using Rasch analysis. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(4), 851–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.013
28.
LiK.YanT.YouL.LiY.TangJ.WangY.GaoY. (2017). Rasch analysis of the qualifier response options of the ICF set for spinal cord injury nursing. Chinese Journal of Physics Medicine and Rehabilitation, 39(2), 109–113.
29.
LiY.FangJ. (2011). Development of a short form of WHOQOL-OLD. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(01), 27–30.
30.
LinY.ZhangW.FangJ. (2014). The application of item response theory in screening item of medical scale. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 11(05), 155–158.
31.
LiuY.ZhangS.ZhaoY.DuJ.JinG.ShaoS.LuX. (2016). Development and application of the Chinese (Mainland) version of Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire to assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic hepatitis B. PLOS ONE, 11(9), Article e0162763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162763
32.
LutomskiJ. E.KrabbeP. F. M.Den ElzenW. P. J.Olde-RikkertM. G. M.SteyerbergE. W.MuntingaM. E.MelisR. J. F. (2016). Rasch analysis reveals comparative analyses of activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living summary scores from different residential settings is inappropriate. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.006
33.
MiaoN.WangF.ZhengH.YinZ. (2021). Estimation of incidence of viral hepatitis B and analysis on case characteristics in China, 2013-2020. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 42(9), 1527–1531. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210319-00227
34.
ModabberniaA.AshrafiM.MalekzadehR.PoustchiH. (2013). A review of psychosocial issues in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 16(2), 114–122.
35.
NielsenM. G.ØrnbølE.VestergaardM.BechP.ChristensenK. S. (2017). The construct validity of the Major Depression Inventory: A Rasch analysis of a self-rating scale in primary care. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 97, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.04.001
36.
OngS. C.LimS. G.LiS. C. (2010). Reliability and validity of a Chinese version’s Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for hepatitis B patients. Value in Health, 13(2), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00615.x
37.
PallantJ. F.MillerR. L.TennantA. (2006). Evaluation of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale using Rasch analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 6, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-6-28
38.
PangH.KangX.LiZ.ZhangJ.LvR.JiangJ. (2014). An application of item response theory in item selection of Chinese self–management of heart failure instrument. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 31(1), 57–60.
39.
PetrilloJ.CanoS. J.McLeodL. D.CoonC. D. (2015). Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: A comparison of worked examples. Value in Health, 18(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.005
40.
PlasS. M. V. D.HansenB. E.BoerJ. B. D.StijnenT.PasschierJ.ManR. A. D.SchalmS. W. (2004). The Liver Disease Symptom Index 2.0; Validation of a Disease-Specific Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 13(8), 1469–1481. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000040797.17449.c0
41.
RapkinB. D.SchwartzC. E. (2004). Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-14
42.
ReiniusM.WettergrenL.WiklanderM.SvedhemV.EkströmA. M.ErikssonL. E. (2017). Development of a 12-item short version of the HIV stigma scale. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0691-z
43.
ReiseS. P.HensonJ. M. (2003). A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_01
44.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
45.
Rossi FerrarioS.PanzeriA.AnselmiP.VidottoG. (2019). Development and psychometric properties of a short form of the Illness Denial Questionnaire. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume, 12, 727–739. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S207622
46.
SamulowitzA.GremyrI.ErikssonE.HensingG. (2018). “Brave men” and “emotional women”: A theory-guided literature review on gender bias in health care and gendered norms towards patients with chronic pain. Pain Research & Management, 2018, 6358624. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6358624
47.
ScottN. W.FayersP. M.AaronsonN. K.BottomleyA.de GraeffA.GroenvoldM.GundyC.KollerM.PetersenM. A.SprangersM. A.EORTC Quality of Life Group, & Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group. (2009). A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(3), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.003
48.
SegawaE.SchaletB.CellaD. (2020). A comparison of computer adaptive tests (CATs) and short forms in terms of accuracy and number of items administrated using PROMIS profile. Quality of Life Research, 29(1), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02312-8
49.
SpiegelB. M.BolusR.HanS.TongM.EsrailianE.TalleyJ.TranT.SmithJ.KarsanH. A.DurazoF.BaconB.MartinP.YounossiZ.Hwa-OngS.KanwalF. (2007). Development and validation of a disease-targeted quality of life instrument in chronic hepatitis B: The hepatitis B quality of life instrument, version 1.0. Hepatology, 46(1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21692
50.
SuS.WongW. C.ZouZ.ChengD. D.OngJ. J.ChanP.JiF.YuenM. F.ZhuangG.SetoW. K.ZhangL. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of universal screening for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in China: An economic evaluation. The Lancet. Global Health, 10(2), e278–e287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00517-9
51.
Taheri EzbaramiZ.HassaniP.Zagheri TafreshiM.Alavi MajdH. (2017). A qualitative study on individual experiences of chronic hepatitis B patients. Nursing Open, 4(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.100
52.
TatumD. S. (2000). Rasch analysis: An introduction to objective measurement. Laboratory Medicine, 31(5), 272–274.
53.
TennantA.ConaghanP. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?Arthritis and Rheumatism, 57(8), 1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108
WallaceJ.PittsM.LiuC.LinV.HajarizadehB.RichmondJ.LocarniniS. (2017). More than a virus: A qualitative study of the social implications of hepatitis B infection in China. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0637-4
56.
WanC. H.YuY. L.TanJ. H. (2016). Introductions on quality of life research: Measurements·assessments·improvements. Science Press.
57.
WangW. L.ZhouY. Q. (2018). Current status and prospects of the application of item response theory to health-related scales. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 35(4), 633–636.
58.
WangY.XuK.HuangX. (2003). Analysis of social support in hospitalized chronic hepatitis B patients. Journal of Nursing Science, 7, 491–492.
59.
WoudstraA. J.MeppelinkC. S.Pander MaatH.OosterhavenJ.FransenM. P.DimaA. L. (2019). Validation of the short assessment of health literacy (SAHL-D) and short-form development: Rasch analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, Article 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0762-4
YounossiZ. M.GuyattG.KiwiM.BoparaiN.KingD. (1999). Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut, 45(2), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.45.2.295
62.
YounossiZ. M.YuM. L.YilmazY.AlswatK. A.ButiM.FernandezM. I. C.PapatheodoridisG.HamidS. S.El-KassasM.ChanW. K.DusejaA. K.GordonS. C.EguchiY.IsakovV. A.RobertsS. K.FanJ. G.SingalA. K.Romero-GómezM.AhmedA.OngJ.. . .AlqahtaniS. (2023). Clinical and patient-reported outcome profile of patients with hepatitis B viral infection from the Global Liver RegistryTM. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 30(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13800
63.
ZhuL.KongJ.ZhengY.SongM.ChengX.ZhangL.PatrickD. L.WangH. (2019). Development and initial validation of the chronic hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) among Chinese patients. Quality of Life Research, 28(11), 3071–3081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02240-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
