With the advent of the new diagnostic model for personality disorders in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), researchers and practitioners in World Health Organization signatory countries are urged to implement it. This study aims to develop a brief, reliable, and valid scale for assessing maladaptive personality traits according to the ICD-11 model, using the item pool of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP-2). Quantitative and qualitative criteria for item selection were applied to a sample of 251 Brazilian adults. As a result, the 25 items (five items per factor) were selected, demonstrating promising evidence of validity based on the internal structure with a database of 1,659 Brazilian adults. In addition, we found good evidence of validity based on relationships with external variables, particularly those related to personality pathology, in a sample of 617 Brazilian adults. The implications of these findings are discussed.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM.SalekinR. T. (2018). Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology. Assessment, 25(5), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116676889
5.
AndersonJ. L.SniderS.SellbomM.KruegerR.HopwoodC. (2014). A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures. Psychiatry Research, 216(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.007
6.
ArslanR. C.WaltherM. P.TataC. S. (2020). Formr: A study framework allowing for automated feedback generation and complex longitudinal experience-sampling studies using R. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-019-01236-Y/FIGURES/5
7.
BachB.BrownT. A.MulderR. T.Newton-HowesG.SimonsenE.SellbomM. (2021). Development and initial evaluation of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity scale: PDS-ICD-11. Personality and Mental Health, 15(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1510
8.
BachB.KerberA.AlujaA.BastiaensT.KeeleyJ.ClaesL.FossatiA.GutierrezF.OliveiraS.PiresR.RiegelK.RollandJ.RoskamI.SellbomM.SommaA.SpanembergL.StrusW.ThimmJ.WrightA. G. C.ZimmermannJ. (2020). International assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder traits: Toward a common nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology, 53(3–4), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507589
9.
BachB.KramerU.DoeringS.di GiacomoE.HutsebautJ.KaeraA.De PanfilisC.SchmahlC.SwalesM.TaubnerS.RennebergB. (2022). The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: A European perspective on challenges and opportunities. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40479-022-00182-0/TABLES/4
10.
BachB.MulderR. (2022). Clinical implications of ICD-11 for diagnosing and treating personality disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24(10), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11920-022-01364-X
11.
BachB.SellbomM.KongerslevM.SimonsenE.KruegerR. F.MulderR. (2017). Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from DSM-5 traits: Initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12748
12.
BarbosaR. S.FagnaniE. (2022). The unified health system of Brazil and the effectiveness of health services. Journal of Public Health, 30, 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01404-x
13.
Barchi-FerreiraA. M.LoureiroS. R.TorresA. R.da SilvaT. D. A.MorenoA. L.DeSousaD. A.ChagasM. H. N.Dos SantosR. G.Machado-de-SouzaJ. P.ChagasN. M. S.HallakJ. E. C.CrippaJ. A. S.OsórioF. L. (2019). Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Cross-cultural adaptation and content validity in the Brazilian context. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 41(3), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0098
14.
Barchi-FerreiraA. M.OsórioF. L. (2022). Psychometric study of the Brazilian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-paper-and-pencil version. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 976831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976831
CarlsonK. D.HerdmanA. O. (2012). Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110392383
17.
CarvalhoL. F.GomesG. V. A.da Silva. (2021). Publications on personality disorders in Brazilian journals: A narrative review. Avaliação Psicológica, 20(3), 369–378. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-13755-011
18.
CarvalhoL. F.GonçalvesA. P.AraujoJ. A.MacedoF. M. (2021). Verification of the internal structure of the dimensional clinical personality inventory 2 in a Brazilian community sample. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 30(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v30n2.83530
19.
CarvalhoL. F.MachadoG. M.PadovaniS.PianowskiG. (2021). Measuring pathological traits of the schizotypal personality disorder through the HiTOP model. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(6), 839–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/SJOP.12761
20.
CarvalhoL. F.PianowskiG. (2021). Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2: Antecedents, development, and future improvements. Interação Em Psicologia, 25(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.5380/RIEP.V25I3.67438
21.
CarvalhoL. F.PrimiR. (2019). Technical manual of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) and Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory screening version (IDCP-triagem). Pearson.
22.
CarvalhoL. F.PrimiR. (2015). Development and internal structure investigation of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28, 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528212
23.
CastroM. C.MassudaA.AlmeidaG.Menezes-FilhoN. A.AndradeM. V.de Souza NoronhaK. V. M.RochaR.MacinkoJ.HoneT.TascaR.GiovanellaL.MalikA. M.WerneckH.FachiniL. A.AtunR. (2019). Brazil’s unified health system: The first 30 years and prospects for the future. The Lancet, 394(10195), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31243-7
24.
ChoiS. H.MitchellJ.LipkusI. (2017). Lessons learned from an online study with dual-smoker couples. American Journal of Health Behavior, 41(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.41.1.6
25.
ClarkL. A. (1990). Toward a consensual set of symptom clusters for assessment of personality disorder. In ButcherJ. N.SpielbergerC. D. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 8, pp. 243–266). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-97345-009
26.
ConwayC. C.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.FriedE. I.HallquistM. N.KotovR.Mullins-SweattS. N.ShackmanA. J.SkodolA. E.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaszczukM. A.ZaldD. H.AfzaliM. H.BornovalovaM. A.CarragherN.DochertyA. R.JonasK. G.KruegerR. F.. . .EatonN. R. (2019). A hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology can transform mental health research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618810696
27.
CregoC.WidigerT. A. (2020). The convergent, discriminant, and structural relationship of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP with the ICD-11, DSM-5, and FFM trait models. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000757
28.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.BarrettP. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
29.
FinebergN. A.ReghunandananS.KolliS.AtmacaM. (2014). Obsessive-compulsive (anankastic) personality disorder: Toward the ICD-11 classification. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1282
GaebelW.StrickerJ.KerstA. (2020). Changes from ICD-10 to ICD-11 and future directions in psychiatric classification. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/WGAEBEL
33.
GarcíaL. F.AlujaA.UrietaP.GutierrezF. (2022). High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000486
34.
Gecaite-StoncieneJ.LochnerC.MarincowitzC.FinebergN. A.SteinD. J. (2021). Obsessive-Compulsive (Anankastic)Personality Disorder in the ICD-11: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 646030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.646030
35.
GomezR.WatsonS.StavropoulosV. (2020). Personality Inventory for DSM-5, brief form: Factor structure, reliability, and coefficient of congruence. Personality Disorders, 11(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000364
36.
GutiérrezF.AlujaA.RodríguezC.GárrizM.PeriJ. M.GallartS.CalvoN.FerrerM.Gutiérrez-ZotesA.SolerJ.PascualJ. C. (2023). Severity in the ICD-11 personality disorder model: Evaluation in a Spanish mixed sample. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 1015489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1015489
37.
GutiérrezF.AlujaA.RuizJ.GarcíaL. F.GárrizM.Gutiérrez-ZotesA.Gallardo-PujolD.Navarro-HaroM. V.Alabèrnia-SeguraM.Mestre-PintóJ. I.TorrensM.PeriJ. M.SuredaB.SolerJ.PascualJ. C.VallG.CalvoN.FerrerM.OltmannsJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2021). Personality disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a mixed community and clinical sample. Assessment, 28(3), 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120936357
38.
HartW.LambertJ. T.CeaseC. K.CastagnaP. (2024). Antagonistic personality and symptoms of psychological distress: Feeling less bad about being impaired. Personality and Individual Differences, 223, 112619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112619
39.
HaslamN.McGrathM. J.ViechtbauerW.KuppensP. (2020). Dimensions over categories: A meta-analysis of taxometric research. Psychological Medicine, 50(9), 1418–1432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000183X
40.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
41.
HuprichS. K. (2020). Personality disorders in the ICD-11: Opportunities and challenges for advancing the diagnosis of personality pathology. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(8), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01161-4
42.
IliescuD.GreiffS.ZieglerM.NyeC.GeisingerK.SellbomM.SamuelD.SaklofskeD. (2024). Proliferation of measures contributes to advancing psychological science. Communications Psychology, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00065-w
43.
KerberA.SchultzeM.MüllerS.RühlingR. M.WrightA. G. C.SpitzerC.KruegerR. F.KnaevelsrudC.ZimmermannJ. (2022). Development of a short and ICD-11 compatible measure for DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits using ant colony optimization algorithms. Assessment, 29(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120971848/FORMAT/EPUB
44.
KernbergO. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders: Psychotherapeutic strategies. Yale University Press.
45.
KimY. R.TyrerP.HwangS. T. (2021). Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11 personality trait domains: Development and testing. Personality and Mental Health, 15(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/PMH.1493
46.
KotovR.JonasK. G.CarpenterW. T.DretschM. N.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.HobbsK.ReininghausU.SladeT.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaszczukM. A.WidigerT. A.WrightA. G. C.ZaldD. H.KruegerR. F.WatsonD. (2020). Validity and utility of hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20730
47.
KotovR.WaszczukM. A.KruegerR. F.ForbesM. K.WatsonD.ClarkL. A.AchenbachT. M.AlthoffR. R.IvanovaM. Y.Michael BagbyR.BrownT. A.CarpenterW. T.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.EatonN. R.ForbushK. T.GoldbergD.HasinD.HymanS. E.. . .ZimmermanM. (2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
ŁakutaP.CieciuchJ.StrusW.MoreyL. (2022). Psychometric evaluation of the polish adaptation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 level of personality functioning scale (LPFS-SR). Psychiatria Polska, 263, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/142888
LugoV.de OliveiraS. E. S.HesselC. R.MonteiroR. T.PascheN. L.PavanG.MottaL. S.PachecoM. A.SpanembergL. (2019). Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients. Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1436
54.
MachadoG. M.CarvalhoL. F. (2021). Investigation on the internal and external validity of the antisocial subscale of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(6), 917–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2021.1945660
55.
MaplesJ. L.CarterN. T.FewL. R.CregoC.GoreW. L.SamuelD. B.WilliamsonR. L.LynamD. R.WidigerT. A.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F.MillerJ. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120
56.
McCabeG. A.WidigerT. A. (2020). A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 section III personality disorder models. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/PAS0000772
57.
MulderR. T. (2021). ICD-11 personality disorders: Utility and implications of the new model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 655548. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2021.655548
58.
MulderR. T.HorwoodJ.TyrerP.CarterJ.JoyceP. R. (2016). Validating the proposed ICD-11 domains. Personality and Mental Health, 10(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/PMH.1336
59.
OliveiraN. P. (2021). O modelo diagnóstico de transtornos da personalidade da CID-11: Estudos psicométricos [The ICD-11 diagnostic model of personality disorders: Psychometric studies]. [Master’s thesis, University of Brasília]. RIUnB. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/43228
60.
OliveiraN. P.OliveiraS. E. S.Mansur-AlvesM.CarvalhoL. F. (2023). O novo modelo diagnóstico de transtornos da personalidade da CID-11 e a sua aplicação [The new ICD-11 diagnostic model for personality disorders and its application] Revista Brasileira de Psicoterapia, 25(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.5935/2318-0404.20230006
61.
OliveiraS. E. S. (2023). Inventário de Severidade do Transtorno da Personalidade para a CID-11 [Inventory of Personality Disorder Severity for ICD-11] [Unpublished test]. University of Brasília.
62.
OliveiraS. E. S.BandeiraD. R.KruegerR. F. (2016, March 31–April 4). Advantages and disadvantages of reduced versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) [Paper presentation]. 2nd World Conference on Personality Psychology. https://www.perpsy.org/getmedia.php/_media/perpsy/201605/21v0-orig.pdf
63.
OliveiraS. E. S.BandeiraD. R.PrimiR.KruegerR. F. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Brazilian Samples. Psico-USF, 26(Special Issue), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-8271202126NESP11
64.
OliveiraS. E. S.OliveiraN. (2023). Adaptação e Propriedades Psicométricas da Versão Brasileira da Borderline Pattern Scale (BPS) [Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Borderline Pattern Scale (BPS)]. Recital-Revista de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Almenara/MG, 5(3), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.46636/recital.v5i3.456
65.
OltmannsJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/PAS0000459
66.
OltmannsJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2020). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11: A facet-level assessment of the ICD-11 trait model. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000763
PianowskiG.CarvalhoL.deF.MiguelF. K. (2019). Investigating the Spectra constellations of the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP) model for personality disorders based on empirical data from a community sample. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 41(2), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0015
69.
RevelleW. (2024). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (R Package Version 2.4.3). Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
70.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
71.
RuggeroC. J.KotovR.HopwoodC. J.FirstM.ClarkL. A.SkodolA. E.Mullins-SweattS. N.PatrickC. J.BachB.CiceroD. C.DochertyA.SimmsL. J.Michael BagbyR.KruegerR. F.CallahanJ. L.ChmielewskiM.ConwayC. C.ClercqB.De Dornbach-BenderA.. . .ZimmermannJ. (2019). Integrating the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(12), 1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/CCP0000452
72.
SamuelD. B.BallingC. E.BucherM. A. (2022). The alternative model of personality disorder is inadequate for capturing obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Personality Disorders, 13(4), 418–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000544
73.
SellbomM.Solomon-KrakusS.BachB.BagbyR. M. (2020). Validation of Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID-5) algorithms to assess ICD-11 personality trait domains in a psychiatric sample. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000746
74.
ShedlerJ.WestenD. (2004). Refining personality disorder diagnosis: Integrating science and practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(8), 1350–1365. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1350
75.
SimmsL. J.GoldbergL. R.RobertsJ. E.WatsonD.WelteJ.RottermanJ. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT-PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.577475
76.
SteinD. J.ShoptawS. J.VigoD. V.LundC.CuijpersP.BantjesJ.SartoriusN.MajM. (2022). Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: Paradigm shifts versus incremental integration. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 21(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20998
77.
StrickerJ.PietrowskyR. (2022). Incremental validity of the ICD-11 personality disorder model for explaining psychological distress. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000489
78.
TaylorS.AsmundsonG. J.JangK. L. (2011). Etiology of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and obsessive-compulsive personality traits: Common genes, mostly different environments. Depression and Anxiety, 28(10), 863–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20859
TyrerP.MulderR.KimY. R.CrawfordM. J. (2019). The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-CLINPSY-050718-095736
81.
TyrerP.ReedG. M.CrawfordM. J. (2015). Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder. The Lancet, 385(9969), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61995-4
82.
VallsC. M.BalazadehK.KajoniusP. (2023). Investigating the overlap and predictive validity between Criterion A and B in the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5. International Journal of Testing. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661
83.
van KampenD. (2012). The 5-Dimensional Personality Test (5DPT): Relationships with two lexically based instruments and the validation of the absorption scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627966
84.
WidigerT. A.SimonsenE. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628
85.
World Health Organization. (1992). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.).
86.
World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/browse11
87.
ZattiC.OliveiraS. E. S.GuimarãesL. S. P.CalegaroV. C.BenettiS. P. D. C.SerraltaF. B.FreitasL. H. M. (2020). Translation and cultural adaptation of the DSM-5 Personality Inventory–Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 42(4), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0073
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
