The Multidimensional Jealousy Scale is the standard instrument to assess cognitive, emotional, and behavioral jealousy. We examined competing factor models and external correlations with broad and narrow traits. Across two studies, we analyzed four samples (Ntotal = 2,117). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the measurement model of three correlated factors in comparison to unidimensional, second-order, and bifactor models. Thus, speaking against the use of a total score. Furthermore, we found measurement invariance between romantic partners. We extended the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale (MJS)’ nomological net to personality pathology and replicated prior findings of associations with broad and narrow traits. Study 2 examined longitudinal data (5- to 9-month lag) from couples. Actor-Partner Interdependence Model analyses showed that the MJS predicts facets of relationship satisfaction in actors and partners. We discuss potential avenues for revising the MJS (e.g., heteronormative item wordings).
AttridgeM. (2013). Jealousy and relationship closeness: Exploring the good (reactive) and bad (suspicious) sides of romantic jealousy. SAGE Open, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013476054
4.
BrassardA.Brault-LabbéA.GasparettoC. A.ClaingA.LussierY. (2020). Validation de la version francophone de la Multidimensional Jealousy Scale [Validation of the French version of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 52(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000155
5.
BrauerK.ProyerR. T. (2021). Analyzing a German-language expanded form of the PhoPhiKat-45: Psychometric properties, factorial structure, measurement invariance with the Likert-version, and self-peer convergence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1720699
6.
BrauerK.RangerJ.ZieglerM. (2023). Confirmatory factor analyses in Psychological Test Adaptation and Development: A non-technical discussion of the WLSMV estimator. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 4(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-18/a000034
7.
BrauerK.SendatzkiR.ProyerR. T. (2021). Testing the associations between dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at and romantic jealousy in couples: An APIM analysis. Journal of Personality, 89, 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12621
8.
BrauerK.SendatzkiR.ScherrerT.ChickG.ProyerR. T. (2023). Revisiting adult playfulness and relationship satisfaction: APIM analyses of middle-aged and older couples. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 8, 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-021-00058-8
9.
BrennanK.ClarkC.ShaverP. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment. An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ.RholesW. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford.
10.
BussD. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(88)90010-6
11.
BussD. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617698225
12.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
13.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
14.
ChinK.AtkinsonB. E.RahebH.HarrisE.VernonP. A. (2017). The dark side of romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.003
15.
ChmielewskiM.WatsonD. (2009). What is being assessed and why it matters: The impact of transient error on trait research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015618
16.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405
17.
DavisD. R.BooneW. (2021). Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the psychometric functioning of the other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical (OLIW) adult playfulness scale. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100054
18.
De CristofaroV.PellegriniV.SalvatiM.GiacomantonioM. (2022). Examining and understanding patterns of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral jealousy: Dispositional Mindfulness as a protective factor in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(5), 1368–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221139631
19.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
20.
DiotaiutiP.ValenteG.ManconeS.GirelliL.CavicchioloE.ChiricoA. (2022). Validation study of the Italian brief version of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance across gender, and convergent validity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1013584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013584
21.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
22.
ElphinstonR. A.FeeneyJ. A.NollerP. (2011). Measuring romantic jealousy: Validation of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale in Australian samples. Australian Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00026.x
23.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
24.
FraleyR. C.HudsonN. W.HeffernanM. E.SegalN. (2015). Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000027
25.
GublerD. A.SchlegelK.RichterM.KapanciT.TrocheS. J. (2023). The green-eyed monster in social media–Development and validation of a Digital Jealousy Scale. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 4, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000033
26.
HinzA.ConradI.SchroeterM. L.GlaesmerH.BrählerE.ZengerM.. . .HerzbergP. Y. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), derived from a large German community sample. Quality of Life Research, 27(6), 1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1844-1
27.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
28.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
29.
KemerG.BulganG.Çetinkaya YildizE. (2016). Gender differences, infidelity, dyadic trust, and jealousy among married Turkish individuals. Current Psychology, 35, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9298-2
30.
KennyD. A.LedermannT. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019651
31.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H.CruzM. G. (2001). The role of relationship development and attachment in the experience of romantic jealousy. Personal Relationships, 8(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00036.x
32.
KörnerR.SchützA. (2021). Power in romantic relationships: How positional and experienced power are associated with relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(9), 2653–2677. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211017670
33.
KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
34.
MaleszaM.OstaszewskiP.BüchnerS.KaczmarekM. C. (2019). The adaptation of the Short Dark Triad personality measure-Psychometric properties of a German sample. Current Psychology, 38(3), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9662-0
35.
MoshagenM.MuschJ. (2014). Sample size requirements of the robust weighted least squares estimator. Methodology, 10(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000068
NeumannE.RohmannE.BierhoffH. W. (2007). Entwicklung und Validierung von Skalen zur Erfassung von Vermeidung und Angst in Partnerschaften [Development and validation of scales for measuring avoidance and anxiety in romantic relationships—The Bochum Adult Attachment Questionnaire]. Diagnostica, 53(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.53.1.33
38.
OstendorfF. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur. Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit [Language and personality structure: On the validity of the five-factor model of personality]. Roderer.
ProyerR. T. (2012). Development and initial assessment of a short measure for adult playfulness: The SMAP. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.018
41.
ProyerR. T. (2017). A new structural model for the study of adult playfulness: Assessment and exploration of an understudied individual differences variable. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.011
42.
ProyerR. T.BrauerK.WolfA.ChickG. (2019). Adult playfulness and relationship satisfaction: An APIM analysis of romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.02.001
RodriguezL. M.DiBelloA. M.ØverupC. S.NeighborsC. (2015). The price of distrust: Trust, anxious attachment, jealousy, and partner abuse. Partner Abuse, 6(3), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.3.298
45.
RuchW.ProyerR. T. (2009). Extending the study of gelotophobia: On gelotophiles and katagelasticists. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1-2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2009.009
46.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A.MarshH. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
47.
SiffertA.BodenmannG. (2010). Entwicklung eines neuen multidimensionalen Fragebogens zur Erfassung der Partnerschaftsqualität (FPQ) [Development of a new multidimensional questionnaire for the assessment of relationship quality (FPQ)]. Journal of Family Research, 22(2), 242–255.
48.
StiegerS.PreyssA. V.VoracekM. (2012). Romantic jealousy and implicit and explicit self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.028
49.
TaniF.PontiL. (2016). The romantic jealousy as multidimensional construct: A study on the Italian Short Form of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale. The Open Psychology Journal, 9(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101609010111
50.
Tošić-RadevM.HedrihV. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale (MJS) on a Serbian sample. Psihologija, 50(4), 521–534.
51.
ValentovaJ. V.FernandezA. M.PereiraM.VarellaM. A. C. (2022). Jealousy is influenced by sex of the individual, their partner, and their rival. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(6), 2867–2877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02341-4
WatsonD. (2004). Stability versus change, dependability versus error: Issues in the assessment of personality over time. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(4), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.03.001
54.
WehnerC.MaaßU.LeckeltM.BackM. D.ZieglerM. (2021). Validation of the Short Dark Triad in a German sample: Structure, nomological network, and an ultrashort version. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(5), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000617
55.
WigmanS. A.Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2008). Investigating sub-groups of harassers: The roles of attachment, dependency, jealousy, aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9171-x
56.
ZimmermannJ.AltensteinD.KriegerT.HoltforthM. G.PretschJ.AlexopoulosJ.LeisingD. (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(4), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
