Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) has been collected to capture the dynamic fluctuations of procrastination; however, researchers have typically measured daily procrastination by modifying trait measures (e.g., adding a time reference “today”) without adequately testing their reliabilities. The main purpose of this study was to use an advanced approach, dynamic structural equation modeling, to assess the between- and within-person reliabilities of a widely used six-item measure of daily procrastination. A total of 252 participants completed retrospective measures of various types of trait procrastination and daily measures of procrastination over 34 consecutive days. The results showed that the entire scale for daily procrastination and five of its six items had high between- and within-person reliabilities, but one item had much lower reliabilities, suggesting that this item may be inappropriate in everyday contexts. Furthermore, we found moderate to strong associations between the latent trait factor of procrastination and trait measures of procrastination. In addition, we identified substantial between-person variation in person-specific reliabilities and explored its relevant factors. Overall, this study assessed the reliabilities of a daily measure of procrastination, which facilitated future studies to obtain more reliable and consistent results and to better estimate the reliability of ILD.
AalbersG.vanden AbeeleM. M.HendricksonA. T.De MarezL.KeijsersL. (2022). Caught in the moment: Are there person-specific associations between momentary procrastination and passively measured smartphone use?Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 115–135.
BäulkeL.DaumillerM.DreselM. (2021). The role of state and trait motivational regulation for procrastinatory behavior in academic contexts: Insights from two diary studies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101951.
5.
BentlerP. M. (2007). Covariance structure models for maximal reliability of unit-weighted composites. In LeeS. Y. (Ed.), Handbook of latent variable and related models (pp. 1–19). North-Holland.
6.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 579–616.
7.
BrowneM. W.NesselroadeJ. R. (2005). Representing psychological processes with dynamic factor models: Some promising uses and extensions of autoregressive moving average time series models. In Maydeu-OlivaresA.McArdleJ. J. (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 415–452). Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CalamiaM. (2019). Practical considerations for evaluating reliability in ambulatory assessment studies. Psychological Assessment, 31(3), 285–291.
9.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917–929.
10.
DubadM.WinsperC.MeyerC.LivanouM.MarwahaS. J. P. M. (2018). A systematic review of the psychometric properties, usability and clinical impacts of mobile mood-monitoring applications in young people. Psychological Medicine, 48(2), 208–228.
11.
FlettA. L.HaghbinM.PychylT. A. (2016). Procrastination and depression from a cognitive perspective: An exploration of the associations among procrastinatory automatic thoughts, rumination, and mindfulness. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 34, 169–186.
12.
Fuller-TyszkiewiczM.Hartley-ClarkL.CumminsR. A.TomynA. J.WeinbergM. K.RichardsonB. (2017). Using dynamic factor analysis to provide insights into data reliability in experience sampling studies. Psychological Assessment, 29(9), 1120–1128.
13.
GadoseyC. K.SchnettlerT.ScheunemannA.FriesS.GrunschelC. (2021). The intraindividual co-occurrence of anxiety and hope in procrastination episodes during exam preparations: An experience sampling study. Learning and Individual Differences, 88, 102013.
14.
GeldhofG. J.PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91.
15.
GelmanA.RubinD. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457–472.
16.
GortC.Marcusson-ClavertzD.KuehnerC. (2021). Procrastination, affective state, rumination, and sleep quality: Investigating reciprocal effects with ambulatory assessment. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 39, 58–85.
17.
HorstmannK. T.ZieglerM. (2020). Assessing personality states: What to consider when constructing personality state measures. European Journal of Personality, 34(6), 1037–1059.
18.
JimenezA.McMahonT. P.WatsonD.Naragon-GaineyK. (2022). Dysphoria and well-being in daily life: Development and validation of ecological momentary assessment scales. Psychological Assessment, 34(6), 546–557.
19.
KimK. R.SeoE. H. (2015). The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 26–33.
20.
KlassenR. M.AngR. P.ChongW. H.KrawchukL. L.HuanV. S.WongI. Y.YeoL. S. (2009). A cross-cultural study of adolescent procrastination. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(4), 799–811.
21.
KlibertJ.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.LunaA.RobichauxM. (2011). Suicide proneness in college students: Relationships with gender, procrastination, and achievement motivation. Death Studies, 35(7), 625–645.
22.
KoppenborgM.KlingsieckK. B. (2022). Social factors of procrastination: Group work can reduce procrastination among students. Social Psychology of Education, 25(1), 249–274.
23.
KroemekeA.Sobczyk-KruszelnickaM. (2019). Protective buffering and individual and relational adjustment following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A dyadic daily-diary study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2195.
24.
KroeseF. M.EversC.AdriaanseM. A.de RidderD. T. (2016). Bedtime procrastination: A self-regulation perspective on sleep insufficiency in the general population. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(5), 853–862.
25.
KühnelJ.BledowR.FeuerhahnN. (2016). When do you procrastinate? Sleep quality and social sleep lag jointly predict self-regulatory failure at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 983–1002.
26.
KühnelJ.BledowR.KuonathA. (2023). Overcoming procrastination: Time pressure and positive affect as compensatory routes to action. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(4), 803–819.
27.
LeeD. G.KellyK. R.EdwardsJ. K. (2006). A closer look at the relationships among trait procrastination, neuroticism, and conscientiousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 27–37.
28.
LoefflerS. N.StumppJ.GrundS.LimbergerM. F.Ebner-PriemerU. W. (2019). Fostering self-regulation to overcome academic procrastination using interactive ambulatory assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 75, 101760.
29.
LuoY.SmithD. M.MoosbruggerM.FranceT. J.WangK.ChengY.. . .SiS. (2023). Dynamics and moderating factors of esport participation and loneliness: A daily diary study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 66, 102384.
30.
MaierT.KühnelJ.ZimmermannB. (2021). How did you sleep tonight? The relevance of sleep quality and sleep–wake rhythm for procrastination at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 785154.
31.
McNeishD.HamakerE. L. (2020). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychological Methods, 25(5), 610–635.
32.
McNeishD.MackinnonD. P.MarschL. A.PoldrackR. A. (2021). Measurement in intensive longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(5), 807–822.
33.
MielniczukE. (2023). Call for new measures suitable for intensive longitudinal studies: Ideas and suggestions. New Ideas in Psychology, 68, 100983.
34.
MolenaarP. C. (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50(2), 181–202.
35.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
36.
PollackS.HerresJ. (2020). Prior day negative affect influences current day procrastination: A lagged daily diary analysis. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 33(2), 165–175.
37.
RaykovT. (1997a). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184.
38.
RaykovT. (1997b). Scale reliability, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(4), 329–353.
39.
RaykovT. (1998). Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22(4), 375–385.
40.
SchönbrodtF. D.Zygar-HoffmannC.NestlerS.PuschS.HagemeyerB. (2022). Measuring motivational relationship processes in experience sampling: A reliability model for moments, days, and persons nested in couples. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1869–1888.
41.
SchultzbergM.MuthénB. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 495–515.
42.
SchuurmanN. K.HamakerE. L. (2019). Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 70–91.
SiroisF. M.YangS.van EerdeW. (2019). Development and validation of the General Procrastination Scale (GPS-9): A short and reliable measure of trait procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 26–33.
45.
SolomonL. J.RothblumE. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503–509.
46.
SteelP. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
47.
SteelP.FerrariJ. (2013). Sex, education and procrastination: An epidemiological study of procrastinators’ characteristics from a global sample. European Journal of Personality, 27(1), 51–58.
48.
SteelP.KönigC. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 889–913.
49.
SvartdalF.PfuhlG.NordbyK.FoschiG.KlingsieckK. B.RozentalA.. . .RębkowskaK. (2016). On the measurement of procrastination: Comparing two scales in six European countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1307.
50.
TiceD. M.BaumeisterR. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8(6), 454–458.
51.
TuckmanB. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 473–480.
52.
Van EerdeW.VenusM. (2018). A daily diary study on sleep quality and procrastination at work: The moderating role of trait self-control. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2029.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
