Technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) includes different forms of digital violence, such as online gender-based violence, online gender- and sexuality-based violence, digital sexual harassment, online sexual coercion, and nonconsensual pornography. The aim of this study was to design and validate a measure to assess the perpetration and victimization of each dimension of TFSV. The relationships between the different dimensions and differences by gender and sexual orientation were also analyzed. The participants were a sample of 2,486 adults (69% women) from Spain, aged between 16 and 79 (M = 25.95; DT = 9.809) years. The Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence Scales were found to be valid and reliable instruments, supporting our recommendation for the use of these scales. Network analysis and solution-based exploratory factor analyses showed that the dimensions of online sexual coercion and nonconsensual pornography clustered together. All the perpetration variables were related to sexism. Finally, cis women and nonheterosexual people reported higher victimization scores overall compared to cis men and heterosexuals, respectively, while cis men reported higher perpetration scores overall than cis women.
Bilgehan OzturkM. (2011). Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in Turkey. Human Relations, 64(8), 1099–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710396249
3.
CampbellJ. C.SabriB.BudhathokiC.KaufmanM. R.AlhusenJ.DeckerM. R. (2021). Unwanted sexual acts among university students: Correlates of victimization and perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), NP504–NP526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517734221
4.
Castaño-PulgarínS. A.Suárez-BetancurN.VegaL. M. T.LópezH. M. H. (2021). Internet, social media and online hate speech. Systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608
5.
ChampionA. R.OswaldF.KheraD.PedersenC. L. (2022). Examining the gendered impacts of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A mixed methods approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(3), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02226-y
6.
ChampionA. R.OswaldF.PedersenC. L. (2021). Technology-facilitated sexual violence and suicide risk: A serial mediation model investigating bullying, depression, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 30(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2020-0044
7.
ChanT. K.CheungC. M.LeeZ. W. (2021). Cyberbullying on social networking sites: A literature review and future research directions. Information & Management, 58(2), 103411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103411
8.
ChristensenA. P.GolinoH.SilviaP. J. (2020). A psychometric network perspective on the validity and validation of personality trait questionnaires. European Journal of Personality, 34(6), 1095–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2265
9.
CitronD. K.FranksM. A. (2014). Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 345–391.
10.
ClancyE. M.KlettkeB.HallfordD. J. (2019). The dark side of sexting—Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.023
11.
CrippsJ.StermacL. (2018). Cyber-sexual violence and negative emotional states among women in a Canadian university. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 12(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1467891
12.
De SantistebanP.Del HoyoJ.Alcázar-CórcolesM. Á.Gámez-GuadixM. (2018). Progression, maintenance, and feedback of online child sexual grooming: A qualitative analysis of online predators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.026
13.
Donoso-VázquezT.Rubio-HurtadoM. J.Vilà-BañosR. (2017). Las ciberagresiones en función del género [Cyberaggressions by gender]. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35(1), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.35.1.249771
14.
Donoso-VázquezT.Rubio-HurtadoM. J.Vilà-BañosR. (2018). La adolescencia ante la violencia de género 2.0: concepciones, conductas y experiencias [Adolescence in the face of gender-based violence 2.0: Conceptions, behaviors, and experiences]. Educación XX1, 21(1), 109–133.
15.
DöringN.MohseniM. R. (2020). Gendered hate speech in YouTube and YouNow comments: Results of two content analyses. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 9(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2020-1-62
ExpósitoF.MoyaM. C.GlickP. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos [Ambivalent sexism: Measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347498760350641
FoxJ.TangW. Y. (2014). Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.014
21.
Gámez-GuadixM.InceraD. (2021). Homophobia is online: Sexual victimization and risks on the internet and mental health among bisexual, homosexual, pansexual, asexual, and queer adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106728
22.
Gámez-GuadixM.Mateos-PérezE.AlcázarM. A.Martínez-BacaicoaJ.WachsS. (2023). Stability of the online grooming victimization of minors: Prevalence and association with shame, guilt, and mental health outcomes over one year. Journal of Adolescence, 95, 1715–1724. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12240
23.
Gámez-GuadixM.Mateos-PérezE.WachsS.WrightM.MartínezJ.ÍnceraD. (2022). Assessing image-based sexual abuse: Measurement, prevalence, and temporal stability of sextortion and nonconsensual sexting (“revenge porn”) among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 94, 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12064
24.
Gámez-GuadixM.SorrelM. A.Martínez-BacaicoaJ. (2023). Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration and victimization among adolescents: A network analysis. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 20, 1000–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00775-y
25.
GarridoL. E.AbadF. J.PonsodaV. (2013). A new look at Horn’s parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030005
26.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
27.
GolinoH.ChristensenA. P. (2021). EGAnet: Exploratory Graph Analysis—A framework for estimating the number of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics (R Package Version 0.9.8). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=EGAnet
28.
GolinoH.ShiD.ChristensenA. P.GarridoL. E.NietoM. D.SadanaR.. . .Martinez-MolinaA. (2020). Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000255
29.
HeiseL.GreeneM. E.OpperN.StavropoulouM.HarperC.NascimentoM.ZewdieD. (2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: Framing the challenges to health. The Lancet, 393(10189), 2440–2454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X
30.
HenryN.FlynnA.PowellA. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: Victims and perpetrators. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 572, 1–19.
31.
HenryN.McGlynnC.FlynnA.JohnsonK.PowellA.ScottA. J. (2020). Image-based sexual abuse: A study on the causes and consequences of non-consensual nude or sexual imagery. Routledge.
32.
HenryN.PowellA. (2015). Embodied harms: Gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 21(6), 758–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576581
33.
HenryN.PowellA. (2018). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
34.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
35.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2021). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R Package Version 0.5-4). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
36.
KarasavvaV.ForthA. (2022). Personality, attitudinal, and demographic predictors of non-consensual dissemination of intimate images. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP19265–NP19289. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211043586
37.
KavanaghE.LitchfieldC.OsborneJ. (2019). Sporting women and social media: Sexualization, misogyny, and gender-based violence in online spaces. International Journal of Sport Communication, 12(4), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2019-0079
38.
KlemmerC. L.ArayasirikulS.RaymondH. F. (2021). Transphobia-based violence, depression, and anxiety in transgender women: The role of body satisfaction. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2633–2655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760015
39.
KussD. J.KristensenA. M.WilliamsA. J.Lopez-FernandezO. (2022). To be or not to be a female gamer: A qualitative exploration of female gamer identity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031169
40.
Martínez-BacaicoaJ. (2019). Proceso de afrontamiento ante el acoso sexual online: una aproximación cualitativa desde la perspectiva género [Coping with online sexual harassment: a qualitative approach from a gender perspective]? (Master’s thesis, Autonomous University of Madrid). Autonomous University of Madrid Repository. https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/690375
41.
Martínez-BacaicoaJ.Alonso-FernándezM.WachsS.Gámez-GuadixM. (2023). Prevalence and motivations for technology-facilitated gender- and sexuality-based violence among adults: A mixed-methods study. Sex Roles, 89, 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01412-7
42.
Martínez-BacaicoaJ.HenryN.Mateos-PérezE.Gámez-GuadixM. (in press). Online gendered violence victimization: Prevalence, age, and gender differences, and psychological outcomes among adults. Psicothema.
43.
Martín-FernándezM.GraciaE.LilaM. (2022). A short measure of acceptability of intimate partner violence against women: Development and validation of the A-IPVAW-8 scale. Assessment, 29(5), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211000110
44.
McCarthyB. (2022). “Who unlocked the kitchen?” Online misogyny, YouTube comments and women’ s professional street skateboarding. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 57(3), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902211021509
45.
McGlynnC.RackleyE.HoughtonR. (2017). Beyond “revenge porn”: The continuum of image-based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies, 25(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9343-2
46.
McGlynnC.RackleyE.JohnsonK.HenryN.FlynnA.PowellA.GaveyN.ScottA. (2019). Shattering lives and myths: A report on image-based sexual abuse [Project report]. Durham University; University of Kent.
47.
MegarryJ. (2014). Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women’s experiences in the digital age. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47(Part A), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012
48.
NagoshiC. T.Raven CloudJ.LindleyL. M.NagoshiJ. L.LothamerL. J. (2019). A test of the three-component model of gender-based prejudices: Homophobia and transphobia are affected by raters’ and targets’ assigned sex at birth. Sex Roles, 80, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0919-3
49.
NájeraP.AbadF. J.SorrelM. A. (2021). Determining the number of attributes in cognitive diagnosis modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614470
NgE. D.ChuaJ. Y. X.ShoreyS. (2022). The effectiveness of educational interventions on traditional bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(1), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020933867
52.
NovaF. F.RifatM. R.SahaP.AhmedS. I.GuhaS. (2019). Online sexual harassment over anonymous social media in Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on information and communication technologies and development (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287107
53.
OksanenA.HawdonJ.HolkeriE.NäsiM.RäsänenP. (2014). Exposure to online hate among young social media users. In Sociological studies of children and youth. Soul of society: A focus on the lives of children & youth (pp. 253–173). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120140000018021
54.
O’MalleyR. L.HoltK. M. (2022). Cyber sextortion: An exploratory analysis of different perpetrators engaging in a similar crime. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520909186
55.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2020). Over the rainbow? The road to LGBTI inclusion. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8d2fd1a8-en
56.
PachankisJ. E.MahonC. P.JacksonS. D.FetznerB. K.BränströmR. (2020). Sexual orientation concealment and mental health: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(10), 831–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000271
57.
PashangS.ClarkeJ.KhanlouN.DegendorferK. (2018). Redefining cyber sexual violence against emerging young women: Toward conceptual clarity. In S. Pashang, N. Khanlou, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Today’s youth and mental health (pp. 77–97). Springer.
58.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2020). Sextortion among adolescents: Results from a national survey of U.S. Youth. Sexual Abuse, 32(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218800469
59.
PatelU.RoeschR. (2022). The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(2), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020958057
60.
PavanE. (2017). Internet intermediaries and online gender-based violence. In Gender, technology and violence (pp. 62–78). http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315441160-5
61.
Pérez-MartínezV.Sanz-BarberoB.Ferrer-CascalesR.BowesN.AyalaA.Sánchez-SanSegundoM.. . .Vives-CasesC. (2021). The role of social support in machismo and acceptance of violence among adolescents in Europe: Lights4violence baseline results. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(5), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.007
62.
PinaA.HollandJ.JamesM. (2017). The malevolent side of revenge porn proclivity: Dark personality traits and sexist ideology. International Journal of Technoethics, 8(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.2017010103
63.
PolandB. (2016). Haters: Harassment, abuse, and violence online. University of Nebraska Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/693771
64.
PowellA.HenryN. (2017). Sexual violence in a digital age. Springer.
65.
PowellA.HenryN. (2019). Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(17), 3637–3665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516672055
66.
PowellA.HenryN.FlynnA.ScottA. J. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: The extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian residents. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.009
67.
PowellA.ScottA. J.FlynnA.HenryN. (2020). Image- based sexual abuse: An international study of victims and perpetrators [Summary report]. RMIT University. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35166.59209
68.
PowellA.ScottA. J.FlynnA.McCookS. (2022). A multi-country study of image-based sexual abuse: Extent, relational nature and correlates of victimisation experiences. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2119292
69.
PowellA.ScottA. J.HenryN. (2020). Digital harassment and abuse: Experiences of sexuality and gender minority adults. European Journal of Criminology, 17(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818788006
70.
Ramati-ZiberL.ShnabelN.GlickP. (2020). The beauty myth: Prescriptive beauty norms for women reflect hierarchy-enhancing motivations leading to discriminatory employment practices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000209
71.
Ramos SalazarL. (2021). Cyberbullying victimization as a predictor of cyberbullying perpetration, body image dissatisfaction, healthy eating and dieting behaviors, and life Satisfaction. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517725737
72.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version = 4.0.2). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
73.
RevelleW. (2020). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (R Package Version 2.1.3). Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
74.
RingenbergT. R.Seigfried-SpellarK. C.RayzJ. M.RogersM. K. (2022). A scoping review of child grooming strategies: Pre- and post-internet. Child Abuse & Neglect, 123, 105392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105392
75.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
76.
RuvalcabaY.EatonA. A. (2020). Nonconsensual pornography among U.S. adults: A sexual scripts framework on victimization, perpetration, and health correlates for women and men. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000233
77.
Salerno-FerraroA. C.ErentzenC.SchullerR. A. (2021). Young women’s experiences with technology-facilitated sexual violence from male strangers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), NP17860–NP17885. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211030018
78.
SnaychukL. A.O’NeillM. L. (2020). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: Prevalence, risk, and resiliency in undergraduate students. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 29(8), 984–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1710636
79.
SunS.FanX.DuJ. (2016). Cyberbullying perpetration: A meta-analysis of gender differences. International Journal of Internet Science, 11(1), 61–81.
80.
VarelaM. V.Méndez-LoisM. J.Barreiro FernándezF. (2021). Gender-based violence in virtual environments: A look at adolescent reality. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 19(3), 509–532.
81.
WalkerK.SleathE.HatcherR. M.HineB.CrookesR. L. (2021). Nonconsensual sharing of private sexually explicit media among university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), NP9078–NP9108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519853414
82.
WickhamH. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag.
XiménezC.Maydeu-OlivaresA.ShiD.RevueltaJ. (2022). Assessing cutoff values of SEM fit indices: Advantages of the unbiased SRMR index and its cutoff criterion based on communality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29, 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1992596
86.
YarM.DrewJ. (2019). Image-based abuse, non-consensual pornography, revenge porn: A study of criminalization and crime prevention in Australia and England & Wales. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(2), 578–594. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3709306
87.
YarM.SteinmetzK. F. (2019). Cybercrime and society. Sage.
88.
YostM. R.ThomasG. D. (2012). Gender and binegativity: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward male and female bisexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9767-8
89.
ZhongL. R.KebbellM. R.WebsterJ. L. (2020). An exploratory study of technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence in online romantic interactions: Can the Internet’s toxic disinhibition exacerbate sexual aggression?Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106314
