The Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Brief Form (PID-5-BF) was developed with an assumption of invariance across sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals. This assumption has yet to be tested empirically. Using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, we examined measurement invariance in the PID-5-BF across the SGM status in clinical (N = 1,174; n = 254 SGM) and nonclinical (N = 1,456; n = 151 SGM) samples. Measurement invariance was supported for the PID-5-BF structure, item thresholds, and factor loadings, but not at the item intercept level. SGM individuals endorsed higher negative affectivity, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism domains in both samples. In the clinical sample, adjusting for partial invariance decreased detachment and antagonism levels for SGM persons. In the nonclinical sample, adjusting for partial invariance reduced antagonism disparities in the SGM group, even rendering original group differences null. Our results support the use of the PID-5-BF in SGM populations but indicate that some measurement bias may drive observed disparities in maladaptive trait domains and, in turn, personality disorder diagnosis.
Al-DajaniN.GralnickT. M.BagbyR. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
3.
AsadiS.BagbyR. M.KruegerR. F.PollockB. G.QuiltyL. C. (2022). Reliability and construct validity of the general factor of personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13, 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000539
4.
AustinA.HerrickH.ProescholdbellS. (2016). Adverse childhood experiences related to poor adult health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302904
5.
BaamsL.GrossmanA. H.RussellS. T. (2015). Minority stress and mechanisms of risk for depression and suicidal ideation among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Developmental Psychology, 51(5), 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038994
6.
BachB.FjeldstedR. (2017). The role of DSM-5 borderline personality symptomatology and traits in the link between childhood trauma and suicidal risk in psychiatric patients. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-017-0063-7
7.
BachB.SellbomM.SimonsenE. (2018). Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in clinical versus nonclinical individuals: Generalizability of psychometric features. Assessment, 25(7), 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117709070
8.
BagbyR. M.KeeleyJ. W.WilliamsC. C.MortezaeiA.RyderA. G.SellbomM. (2022). Evaluating the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Black Americans and White Americans. Psychological Assessment, 34(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001085
9.
BeckerL. G.AsadiS.ZimmermanM.MorganT. A.Rodriguez-SeijasC. (2023). Is there a bias in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder among racially minoritized patients?Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 14, 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000579
10.
BentlerP. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
11.
BoysenG. A.FisherM.DeJesusM.VogelD. L.MadonS. (2011). The mental health stereotype about gay men: The relation between gay men’s self-stereotype and stereotypes about heterosexual women and lesbians. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(4), 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.4.329
CanoK.SumlinE.SharpC. (2022). Screening for borderline personality pathology on college campuses. Personality and Mental Health, 16, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1534
14.
CardonaN. D.MadiganR. J.Sauer-ZavalaS. (2022). How minority stress becomes traumatic invalidation: An emotion-focused conceptualization of minority stress in sexual and gender minority people. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 29, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000054
15.
ChenF. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013193
16.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
17.
ChoateA. M.GoreyC.RappaportL. M.WiernikB. M.BornovalovaM. A. (2021). Alternative model of personality disorders traits predict residential addictions treatment completion. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 228, Article 109011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109011
18.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
19.
CorlissH. L.CochranS. D.MaysV. M. (2002). Reports of parental maltreatment during childhood in a United States population-based survey of homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual adults. Child Abuse, 26, 1165–1178.
20.
CunninghamT. J.FieldsE. C.KensingerE. A. (2021). Boston College daily sleep and well-being survey data during early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Data, 8(1), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00886-y
21.
De LucaS. M.CaramanisC.ZhangA. (2021). A longitudinal study examining the associations of bullying victimization and suicidal ideation among sexual minority adolescents. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 51, 1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12796
22.
DermodyS. S.McGinleyJ.EckstrandK.MarshalM. P. (2020). Sexual minority female youth and substance use disparities across development. Journal of LGBT Youth, 17(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2019.1598313
EatonN. R. (2014). Transdiagnostic psychopathology factors and sexual minority mental health: Evidence of disparities and associations with minority stressors. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(3), 244–254.
25.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
26.
Eubanks-CarterC.GoldfriedM. R. (2006). The impact of client sexual orientation and gender on clinical judgments and diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 751–770.
27.
FeinsteinB. A. (2020). The rejection sensitivity model as a framework for understanding sexual minority mental health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2247–2258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1428-3
28.
FischerR.KarlJ. A. (2019). A primer to (cross-cultural) multi-group invariance testing possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507
29.
FishJ. N.BishopM. D.RussellS. T. (2021). Developmental differences in sexual orientation and gender identity–related substance use disparities: Findings from population-based data. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(6), 1162–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.023
30.
FowlerJ. C.LamkinJ.AllenJ. G.MadanA.OldhamJ. M.PetersenN. J.FruehB. C. (2022). Personality trait domains predict psychiatric symptom and functional outcomes. Psychotherapy, 59(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000421
31.
GomezR.WatsonS.BrownT.StavropoulosV. (2023). Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF): Measurement invariance across men and women. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 14, 334–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000569
32.
GomezR.WatsonS.StavropoulosV. (2020). Personality Inventory for DSM-5, Brief Form: Factor structure, reliability, and coefficient of congruence. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000364
33.
GrantJ. E.FlynnM.OdlaugB. L.SchreiberL. R. (2011). Personality disorders in gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender chemically dependent patients. The American Journal on Addictions, 20(5), 405–411.
34.
HatzenbuehlerM. L. (2009). How does sexual minority stigma “get under the skin”? A psychological mediation framework. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016441
35.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
36.
HyattC. S.Maples-KellerJ. L.CroweM. L.SleepC. E.CarterS. T.MichopoulosV.StevensJ. S.JovanovicT.BradleyB.MillerJ. D.PowersA. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief form in a community sample with high rates of trauma exposure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1713138
37.
JacobL.SmithL.McDermottD.HaroJ. M.StickleyA.KoyanagiA. (2021). Relationship between sexual orientation and psychotic experiences in the general population in England. Psychological Medicine, 51(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171900309X
38.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2021). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package version 0.5-5.912). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
39.
KerberA.SchultzeM.MüllerS.RühlingR. M.WrightA. G. C.SpitzerC.KruegerR. F.KnaevelsrudC.ZimmermannJ. (2022). Development of a short and ICD-11 compatible measure for DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits using ant colony optimization algorithms. Assessment, 29(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120971848
40.
KernbergO. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Rowman & Littlefield.
41.
KingA. R. (2022). PID-5 trait indicators of emotional instability and childhood adversity antecedents. Psychological Reports, 125(1), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120973940
42.
KingM.SemlyenJ.TaiS. S.KillaspyH.OsbornD.PopelyukD.NazarethI. (2008). A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. BMC Psychiatry, 8(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-70
43.
KiteB. A.JorgensenT. D.ChenP.-Y. (2018). Random permutation testing applied to measurement invariance testing with ordered-categorical indicators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1421467
44.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
45.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2014). Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form [Data set]. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/t30042-000
46.
LiC.-H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
47.
MahonC. P.Lombard-VanceR.KiernanG.PachankisJ. E.GallagherP. (2022). Social anxiety among sexual minority individuals: A systematic review. Psychology & Sexuality, 13, 818–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1936140
48.
NyeC. D.BradburnJ.OlenickJ.BialkoC.DrasgowF. (2019). How big are my effects? Examining the magnitude of effect sizes in studies of measurement equivalence. Organizational Research Methods, 22(3), 678–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118761122
49.
NyeC. D.DrasgowF. (2011). Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: Understanding the practical importance of differences between groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022955
50.
PachankisJ. E.ClarkK. A.KleinD. N.DoughertyL. R. (2022). Early timing and determinants of the sexual orientation disparity in internalizing psychopathology: A prospective cohort study from ages 3 to 15. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51, 458–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01532-x
51.
PachankisJ. E.HatzenbuehlerM. L.BränströmR.SchmidtA. J.BergR. C.JonasK.PitoňákM.BarosS.WeatherburnP. (2021). Structural stigma and sexual minority men’s depression and suicidality: A multilevel examination of mechanisms and mobility across 48 countries. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(7), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000693
52.
PachankisJ. E.HatzenbuehlerM. L.StarksT. J. (2014). The influence of structural stigma and rejection sensitivity on young sexual minority men’s daily tobacco and alcohol use. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.005
53.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
54.
ReuterT. R.SharpC.KalpakciA. H.ChoiH. J.TempleJ. R. (2016). Sexual orientation and borderline personality disorder features in a community sample of adolescents. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(5), 694–707.
55.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. É.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
56.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.EatonN. R.PachankisJ. E. (2019). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders at the intersection of race and sexual orientation: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(4), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000377
57.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.MorganT. A.ZimmermanM. (2020a). Stability and consistency of maladaptive personality domains across multiple admissions to an acute care setting. Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000771
58.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.MorganT. A.ZimmermanM. (2020b). Associations between maladaptive personality domains and premature termination in an acute clinical setting. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(5), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000387
59.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.MorganT. A.ZimmermanM. (2021a). Is there a bias in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder among lesbian, gay, and bisexual patients?Assessment, 28(3), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120961833
60.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.MorganT. A.ZimmermanM. (2021b). A population-based examination of criterion-level disparities in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder among sexual minority adults. Assessment, 28(4), 1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121991922
61.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.RogersB. G.AsadiS. (2023). Personality disorders research and social decontextualization: What it means to be a minoritized human. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 14(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000600
62.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.RuggeroC.EatonN. R.KruegerR. F. (2019). The DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders and clinical treatment: A review. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 6(4), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-019-00187-7
63.
RossL. E.SalwayT.TarasoffL. A.MacKayJ. M.HawkinsB. W.FehrC. P. (2018). Prevalence of depression and anxiety among bisexual people compared to gay, lesbian, and heterosexual individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(4–5), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1387755
64.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
65.
RussellT. D.PocknellV.KingA. R. (2017). Lesbians and bisexual women and men have higher scores on the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) than heterosexual counterparts. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.039
66.
RutkowskiL.SvetinaD. (2017). Measurement invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators and fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 30(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1243540
67.
SalwayT.RossL. E.FehrC. P.BurleyJ.AsadiS.HawkinsB.TarasoffL. A. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of disparities in the prevalence of suicide ideation and attempt among bisexual populations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1150-6
68.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A.MarshH. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
69.
SatorraA. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In HeijmansR. D. H.PollockD. S. G.SatorraA. (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis (Vol. 36, pp. 233–247). Springer US.
70.
SommaA.KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E.BorroniS.FossatiA. (2019). Item response theory analyses, factor structure, and external correlates of the Italian Translation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 short form in community-dwelling adults and clinical adults. Assessment, 26(5), 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118781006
71.
SorrelM. A.GarcíaL. F.AlujaA.RollandJ. P.RossierJ.RoskamI.AbadF. J. (2021). Cross-cultural measurement invariance in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychiatry Research, 304, Article 114134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114134
72.
SuzukiT.SouthS. C.SamuelD. B.WrightA. G. C.YalchM. M.HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M. (2019). Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000291
73.
SvetinaD.RutkowskiL. (2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(7), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117717028
74.
SvetinaD.RutkowskiL.RutkowskiD. (2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019
75.
ThimmJ. C.JordanS.BachB. (2017). Hierarchical structure and cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Norwegian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1223682
76.
ThomaesS.BushmanB. J.OrobiodeCastroB.SteggeH. (2009). What makes narcissists bloom? A framework for research on the etiology and development of narcissism. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1233–1247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409990137
77.
Van den BroeckJ.BastiaansenL.RossiG.DierckxE.De ClercqB. (2013). Age-neutrality of the trait facets proposed for personality disorders in DSM-5: A DIFAS analysis of the PID-5. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35(4), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9364-3
78.
WattersC. A.BagbyR. M. (2018). A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000605
79.
WattersC. A.SellbomM.UliaszekA. A.BagbyR. M. (2019). Clarifying the interstitial nature of facets from the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 using the five factor model of personality. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(4), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000327
80.
WuH.EstabrookR. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
81.
YoonM.MillsapR. E. (2007). Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 435–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301677
82.
ZimmermanM.BenjaminI.Rodriguez-SeijasC. (2022). Psychiatric diagnoses among transgender and gender diverse patients compared with cisgender patients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 83, 21m14062.
83.
ZimmermannJ.KerberA.RekK.HopwoodC. J.KruegerR. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(9), 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
84.
ZimmermanM.TerrillD.D'AvanzatoC.TirpakJ. W. (2021). Telehealth treatment of patients in an intensive acute care psychiatric setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparative safety and effectiveness to in-person treatment. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 82(2). https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20m13815
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
