This study examines the congruency between the recently introduced Dark Factor of Personality (D) and Antagonism (A; low Agreeableness) from the Five-Factor Model of personality. Using two samples (Ns of 365 and 600), we examined simple zero-order correlations between D and A (rs of .69 and .64). In addition, we used a range of relevant external criteria (e.g., antisocial behavior, aggression, domains and facets of personality, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM] personality disorders [PDs], impulsivity, and political skill) to examine the degree of absolute similarity in the relations that D and A bear to these criteria. These similarity coefficients were then compared with the similarities produced by measures of constructs different from D and A but similar among themselves (i.e., psychopathy and narcissism in both samples, plus depression in Sample 1). The degree of similarity between D and A (rICCs = .96 and .93) is consistent with what is observed between other measures of the same construct. We conclude that D and A yield largely identical empirical correlates and thus likely represents an instance of the jangle fallacy. We believe that future efforts would be better spent furthering the literature around the well-established Agreeableness versus Antagonism construct.
AllikJ.McCraeR. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 13–28.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
BachB.HutsebautJ. (2018). Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Utility in capturing personality problems in psychiatric outpatients and incarcerated addicts. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 660–670.
4.
BaderM.HartungJ.HilbigB. E.ZettlerI.MoshagenM.WilhelmO. (2021). Themes of the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 33, 511–525.
5.
BarberB. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319.
6.
BookA.VisserB. A.BlaisJ.Hosker-FieldA.Methot-JonesT.GauthierN. Y.. . . D’AgataM. T. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is atDT the core of the dark tetrad?Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272.
7.
BookA.VisserB. A.VolkA. A. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29–38.
8.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
9.
CaspiA.RobertsB. W.ShinerR. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.
10.
ChristieR.GeisF. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press.
11.
ClarkL. A. (1993). Schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality(SNAP). Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
12.
CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D.GaughanE. T.WidigerT. A.LynamD. R. (2016). Development of the super short form of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 143–150.
13.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Professional manual: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
CredéM.TynanM. C.HarmsP. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 492–511.
15.
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203.
16.
DuT. V.CollisonK. L.VizeC.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2021). Development and validation of the Super-Short Form of the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory (FFMI-SSF). Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(6), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1878525
17.
EysenckS. G.EysenckH. J. (1970). Crime and personality: An empirical study of the three-factor theory. British Journal of Criminology, 10, 225–239.
18.
FerrisG. R.TreadwayD. C.KolodinskyR. W.HochwarterW. A.KacmarC. J.DouglasC.FrinkD. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31, 126–152.
19.
FirstM. B.GibbonM.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W.BenjaminL. S. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II). American Psychiatric Press.
20.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.
21.
FriedE. I. (2017). The 52 symptoms of major depression: Lack of content overlap among seven common depression scales. Journal of Affective Disorders, 208, 191–197.
22.
GentileB.MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.ReidyD. E.ZeichnerA.CampbellW. K. (2013). A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory–13 and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1120–1136.
23.
GrazianoW. G.TobinR. M. (2002). Agreeableness: Dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?Journal of Personality, 70(5), 695–728.
24.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29.
25.
HilbigB. E.MoshagenM.HorstenL. K.ZettlerI. (2021). Agreeableness is dead. Long live agreeableness? Reply to Vize and Lynam. Journal of Research in Personality, 91, 104074.
26.
HilbigB. E.ThielmannI.KleinS. A.MoshagenM.ZettlerI. (2021). The dark core of personality and socially aversive psychopathology. Journal of Personality, 89, 216–227.
27.
JangK. L.LivesleyW. J.AngleitnerA.RiemannR.VernonP. A. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 83–101.
28.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
29.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 102–138). The Guilford Press.
30.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432.
31.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41.
32.
KelleyT. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. World Book Company.
33.
KotovR.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.AchenbachT. M.AlthoffR. R.BagbyR. M.. . . ZimmermanM. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477.
34.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613.
35.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.
36.
LambornS. D.MountsN. S.SteinbergL.DornbuschS. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065.
37.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
38.
LilienfeldS. O.PatrickC. J.BenningS. D.BergJ.SellbomM.EdensJ. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders, 3, 327–340.
39.
LivesleyW. J.JacksonD. N.SchroederM. L. (1992). Factorial structure of traits delineating personality disorders in clinical and general population samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 432–440.
40.
LynamD. R.GaughanE. T.MillerJ. D.MillerD. J.Mullins-SweattS.WidigerT. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124.
41.
LynamD. R.MillerJ. (2019). The basic trait of Antagonism: An unfortunately underappreciated construct. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 118–126.
42.
LynamD. R.SmithG. T.WhitesideS. P.CydersM. A. (2006). The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior [Unpublished report]. Purdue University.
43.
LynamD. R.WidigerT. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(2), 160–178.
44.
MaplesJ. L.GuanL.CarterN. T.MillerJ. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1070–1084.
45.
Maples-KellerJ. L.WilliamsonR. L.SleepC. E.CarterN. T.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2019). Using item response theory to develop a 60-item representation of the NEO PI–R using the International Personality Item Pool: Development of the IPIP–NEO–60. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 4–15.
46.
McCraeR. R. (2008). A note on some measures of profile agreement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 105–109.
47.
MillerJ. D.BagbyR. M.HopwoodC. J.SimmsL. J.LynamD. R. (2022). Normative data for PID-5 domains, facets, and personality disorder composites from a representative sample and comparison to community and clinical samples. Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000548
48.
MillerJ. D.GaughanE. T.MaplesJ.PriceJ. (2011). A comparison of agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: Consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy. Assessment, 18, 335–339.
49.
MillerJ. D.HyattC. S.Maples-KellerJ. L.CarterN. T.LynamD. R. (2017). Psychopathy and Machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference?Journal of Personality, 85, 439–453.
50.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2003). Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 168–178.
51.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory’s nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders, 3(3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024567
52.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2019). The handbook of antagonism: Conceptualizations, assessment, consequences, and treatment of the low end of agreeableness. Academic Press.
53.
MillerJ. D.LymanD. R.WidigerT. A.LeukefeldC. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the five factor model adequately represent psychopathy?Journal of Personality, 69(2), 253–276.
54.
MoshagenM.HilbigB. E.ZettlerI. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125, 656–688.
55.
MoshagenM.ZettlerI.HorstenL. K.HilbigB. E. (2020). Agreeableness and the common core of dark traits are functionally different constructs. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, 103986.
56.
MurisP.MerckelbachH.OtgaarH.MeijerE. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 183–204.
57.
O’BoyleE. H.ForsythD. R.BanksG. C.StoryP. A.WhiteC. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664.
58.
OltmannsJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The personality inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment, 30, 154–169.
59.
Packer WestM. M.MillerJ. D.SpencerC. C.WeissB. M.CroweM. L.CampbellW. K.LynamD. R. (2021). Development and validation of the super-short form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory (FFNI-SSF). Personality and Individual Differences, 177, 110825.
60.
PatrickC. J.FowlesD. C.KruegerR. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.
61.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
62.
PilkonisP. A.ChoiS. W.ReiseS. P.StoverA. M.RileyW. T.CellaD. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18, 263–283.
63.
PonockA.MuenksK.MorellM.YangJ. S.GladstoneJ. R.WigfieldA. (2020). Grit and conscientiousness: Another jangle fallacy. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, 104021.
64.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurements, 1, 385–401.
65.
RaineA.DodgeK.LoeberR.Gatzke-KoppL.LynamD.ReynoldsC.. . . LiuJ. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171.
66.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
67.
SandersB.GiolasM. H. (1991). Dissociation and childhood trauma in psychologically disturbed adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 50–54.
68.
SaundersJ. B.AaslandO. G.BaborT. F.de la FuenteJ. R.GrantM. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.
69.
SchmidtF. T.NagyG.FleckensteinJ.MöllerJ.RetelsdorfJ. (2018). Same, but different? Relations between facets of conscientiousness and grit. European Journal of Personality, 32, 705–720.
70.
SharpeB. M.Van TilK.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2021). Incremental and interactive relations of triarchic psychopathy measure scales with antisocial and prosocial correlates: A preregistered replication of Gatner et al. (2016). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000531
71.
SimmsL. J.GoldbergL. R.RobertsJ. E.WatsonD.WelteJ.RottermanJ. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 380–389.
72.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2012). Development of Big Five domains and facets in adulthood: Mean-level age trends and broadly versus narrowly acting mechanisms. Journal of Personality, 80, 881–914.
73.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251.
74.
TellegenA. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety with an emphasis on self-report. In TumaA. H.MaserJ. D. (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp.681–706). Erlbaum.
75.
ThomasK. M.WrightA. G.LukowitskyM. R.DonnellanM. B.HopwoodC. J. (2012). Evidence for the criterion validity and clinical utility of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Assessment, 19(2), 135–145.
76.
ÜstünT. B.ChatterjiS.KostanjsekN.RehmJ.KennedyC.Epping-JordanJ.. . . PullC. (2010). Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 815–823.
77.
VizeC. E.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2019). Using Bayesian methods to update and expand the meta-analytic evidence of the Five-Factor Model’s relation to antisocial behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 67, 61–77.
78.
VizeC. E.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2020). The “core” of the dark triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders, 11, 91–99.
79.
VizeC. E.LynamD. R. (2021). On the importance of the assessment and conceptualization of Agreeableness: A commentary on “Agreeableness and the common core of dark traits are functionally different constructs.”Journal of Research in Personality, 90, Article 104059.
80.
VizeC. E.LynamD. R.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders, 9, 101–111.
81.
VizeC. E.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2021). Examining the conceptual and empirical distinctiveness of agreeableness and “dark” personality items. Journal of Personality, 89, 594–612.
82.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
83.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395–412.
84.
WigginsJ. S.TrapnellP.PhillipsN. (1988). Psychometric and Geometric Characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530.
85.
ZettlerI.MoshagenM.HilbigB. E. (2020). Stability and change: The dark factor of personality shapes dark traits. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 974–983.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
