Empirical studies of adult cyber-aggression are sparse, partly due to a lack of validated assessments. We evaluated a new measure, the Cyber Motivations for Aggression and Deviance (Cyber-MAD) scale, designed to assess the motivations of adult cyber-aggression. Psychometric properties and factor structure were examined across three adult samples who regularly used the internet and reported a history of cyber-aggression. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the motivations for cyber-aggression indicated an eight-factor model best fit the data, with separable factors emerging for cyber-aggression motivated by a desire to affiliate with others (Social Bonding), advance or defend political/social issues (Social Activism), act on angry feelings (Reactive Aggression), cope with relationship stress (Interpersonal Distress), satisfy impulsive urges (Impulsivity), adopt a new online persona (Virtual Dissociation), experience excitement (Thrill-Seeking), and seek revenge (Vengeance). Overall, the Cyber-MAD scale showed good internal consistency, structural stability across samples, and construct validity, supporting its initial validation.
Álvarez-GarcíaD.Barreiro-CollazoA.NúñezJ. C.DobarroA. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Cyber-aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents (CYBA). European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(2), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.02.003
2.
AngR. P.HuanV. S.FlorellD. (2014). Understanding the relationship between proactive and reactive aggression, and cyberbullying across United States and Singapore adolescent samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505149
3.
AquinoK.TrippT. M.BiesR. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653-668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653
4.
ArcherJ.CoyneS. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212-230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2
5.
BarlettC.GentileD. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028113
6.
BarlettC.GentileD.ChewC. (2016). Predicting cyberbullying from anonymity. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000055
7.
BarlettC.HelmstetterK. (2018). Longitudinal relations between early online disinhibition and anonymity perceptions on later cyberbullying perpetration: A theoretical test on youth. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 561-571. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000149
8.
BaumanS. (2019). Political cyberbullying: Perpetrators and targets of a new digital aggression. Praeger.
9.
BeranT.LiQ. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.2190/8YQM-B04H-PG4D-BLLH
10.
BeranT. N.RinaldiC.BickhamD. S.RichM. (2012). Evidence for the need to support adolescents dealing with harassment and cyber-harassment: Prevalence, progression, and impact. School Psychology International, 33(5), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312446976
11.
BerkowitzL. (1993). Pain and aggression: Some findings and implications. Motivation and Emotion, 17(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992223
12.
BerkowitzL. (2003). Affect, aggression, and antisocial behavior. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Series in affective science: Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 804-823). Oxford University Press.
13.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
14.
BogolyubovaO. (2019). Studies in Cyber-Aggression. In SamoilenkoS. A.IcksM.KeohaneJ.ShiraevE. (Eds)., Routledge handbook of character assassination and reputation management (pp. 375-376). Routledge.
15.
BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67(September), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
16.
BushmanB.BaumeisterR.PhillipsC. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.17.
ÇetinB.YamanE.PekerA. (2011). Cyber victim and bullying scale: A study of validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57, 2261-2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.014.
20.
ChoiM.GlassmanM.CristolD. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & Education, 107(April), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.002
21.
CoelhoG. L.MonteiroR. P.HanelP. H.VilarR.GouveiaV. V.MaioG. R. (2018). Psychometric parameters of an abbreviated vengeance scale across two countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 120(January), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.042
22.
CorcoranL.GuckinC. M.PrenticeG. (2015). Cyberbullying or cyber aggression? A review of existing definitions of cyber-based peer-to-peer aggression. Societies, 5(2), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020245
23.
CraigW.Boniel-NissimM.KingN.WalshS. D.BoerM.DonnellyP. D.Harel-FischY.Malinowska-CieślikM.de MatosM. G.CosmaA.EijndenR. V.VienoA.ElgarF. J.MolchoM.BjereldY.PickettW. (2020). Social media use and cyber-bullying: A cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S100-S108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.006
24.
CrickN. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social–psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.610
25.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60
26.
DensonT.PedersenW.MillerN. (2006). The displaced aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1032-1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.1032.
27.
DilmacJ. (2014). Humiliation in the virtual world: Definitions and conceptualization. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 1285-1296. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v11i2.3036
28.
DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1146
29.
FarrellA. D.ThompsonE. L.MehariK. R.SullivanT. N.GoncyE. A. (2020). Assessment of in-person and cyber aggression and victimization, substance use, and delinquent behavior during early adolescence. Assessment, 27(6), 1213-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118792089
30.
FoulkesL.VidingE.McCroryE.NeumannC. S. (2014). Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201
31.
GardnerD.O’DriscollM.Cooper-ThomasH. D.RocheM.BentleyT.CatleyB.TeoS. T. T.TrenberthL. (2016). Predictors of workplace bullying and cyber-bullying in New Zealand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), Article 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050448
32.
GardnerK. J.ArcherJ.JacksonS. (2012). Does maladaptive coping mediate the relationship between borderline personality traits and reactive and proactive aggression?Aggressive Behavior, 38(5), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21437
33.
GeorgeJ. J.LeidnerD. E. (2019). From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), Article 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.001
34.
GriggD. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 20(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143
35.
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.MinorB. L.ElliottV.FernandezM.O’NealL.McLeodL.DelacquaG.DelacquaF.KirbyJ.DudaS. N. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95(July), Article 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
36.
HawleyP. H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000726
37.
HawleyP. H.ShoreyH. S.AldermanP. M. (2009). Attachment correlates of resource-control strategies: Possible origins of social dominance and interpersonal power differentials. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(8), 1097-1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347939
38.
HerringS. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In SchiffrinD.TannenD.HamiltonH. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch32
39.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2019). Connecting adolescent suicide to the severity of bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1492417
40.
HoyleR. H.StephensonM. T.PalmgreenP.LorchE. P.DonohewR. L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(3), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00032-0
41.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
42.
JenaroC.FloresN.FríasC. P. (2018). Systematic review of empirical studies on cyberbullying in adults: What we know and what we should investigate. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 38(January-February), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.12.003
43.
JeonY. A.HaleB.KnackmuhsE.MackertM. (2018). Weight stigma goes viral on the internet: systematic assessment of YouTube comments attacking overweight men and women. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 7(1), Article e6. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.9182
44.
JonesS. E.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 329-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.004
45.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief form (PID-5-BF)-Adult. American Psychiatric Association.
46.
KurekA.JoseP. E.StuartJ. (2019). “I did it for the LULZ”: How the dark personality predicts online disinhibition and aggressive online behavior in adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 98(September), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.027
47.
LiQ. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1777-1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005
48.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(8), 1469-1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.004
49.
MishnaF.Khoury-KassabriM.GadallaT.DaciukJ. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032
50.
MishnaF.RegehrC.Lacombe-DuncanA.DaciukJ.FearingG.Van WertM. (2018). Social media, cyber-aggression and student mental health on a university campus. Journal of Mental Health, 27(3), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2018.1437607
51.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (Version 8). Muthén & Muthén.
52.
NakanoT.SudaT.OkaieY.MooreM. J. (2016). Analysis of cyber aggression and cyber-bullying in social networking. In 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (pp. 337-341). IEEE.
53.
OuvreinG.De BackerC. J.VandeboschH. (2018). Online celebrity aggression: A combination of low empathy and high moral disengagement? The relationship between empathy and moral disengagement and adolescents’ online celebrity aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.029
54.
PauwelsL. J.HardynsW. (2018). Endorsement for extremism, exposure to extremism via social media and self-reported political/religious aggression. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12(1-2), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170229
55.
PellegriniA. D. (2008). The roles of aggressive and affiliative behaviors in resource control: A behavioral ecological perspective. Developmental Review, 28(4), 461-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2008.03.001
56.
PetitJ.LiC.AliK. (2020). Fewer people, more flames: How pre-existing beliefs and volume of negative comments impact online news readers’ verbal aggression. Telematics and Informatics, 56(January), Article 101471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101471
57.
PittaroM. L. (2007). Cyber stalking: An analysis of online harassment and intimidation. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 1(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0025
58.
PriviteraC.CampbellM. A. (2009). Cyberbullying: The new face of workplace bullying?CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 395-400. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0025
59.
RaineA.DodgeK.LoeberR.Gatzke-KoppL.LynamD.ReynoldsC.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LiuJ. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20115
60.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2012). Stalking in the twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students. Deviant Behavior, 33(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.538364
61.
RossJ. M.BabcockJ. C. (2009). Proactive and reactive violence among intimate partner violent men diagnosed with antisocial and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Family Violence, 24(8), 607-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9259-y
62.
RunionsK. C.BakM.ShawT. (2017). Disentangling functions of online aggression: The cyber-aggression typology questionnaire (CATQ). Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21663
63.
RunionsK. C.SalmivalliC.ShawT.BurnsS.CrossD. (2018). Beyond the reactive-proactive dichotomy: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression predict early high school bully and bully/victim status. Aggressive Behavior, 44(5), 501-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21770
64.
SadehN.JavdaniS.FinyM. S.VeronaE. (2011). Gender differences in emotional risk for self- and other-directed violence among externalizing adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022197
SandersC. E.PhyeG. D. (Eds.). (2004). Bullying: Implications for the classroom. Elsevier/Academic Press.
67.
SchnurrM. P.MahatmyaD.BascheR. A. (2013). The role of dominance, cyber aggression perpetration, and gender on emerging adults’ perpetration of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030601
68.
SchoffstallC. L.CohenR. (2011). Cyber aggression: The relation between online offenders and offline social competence. Social Development, 20(3), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00609.x
69.
ScottL. N.SteppS. D.PilkonisP. A. (2014). Prospective associations between features of borderline personality disorder, emotion dysregulation, and aggression. Personality Disorders, 5(3), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000070
70.
ShapkaJ. D.MaghsoudiR. (2017). Examining the validity and reliability of the cyber-aggression and cyber-victimization scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 69(April), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.015
71.
StruchN.SchwartzS. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.364
72.
SukhodolskyD.GolubA.CromwellE. (2001). Development and validation of the Anger Rumination Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00171-9.
VeronaE.SadehN.CaseS. M.ReedA.BhattacharjeeA. (2008). Self-reported use of different forms of aggression in late adolescence and emerging adulthood. Assessment, 15(4), 493-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191108318250
75.
VitaroF.GendreauP. L.TremblayR. E.OlignyP. (1998). Reactive and proactive aggression differentially predict later conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00333
76.
Vivolo-KantorA. M.MartellB. N.HollandK. M.WestbyR. (2014). A systematic review and content analysis of bullying and cyber-bullying measurement strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.008
77.
WatkinsL. E.MaldonadoR. C.DiLilloD. (2018). The cyber aggression in relationships scale: A new multidimensional measure of technology-based intimate partner aggression. Assessment, 25(5), 608-626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116665696
78.
WernerN. E.CrickN. R. (1999). Relational aggression and social-psychological adjustment in a college sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(4), 615-623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.615
79.
WranghamR. W. (2018). Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(2), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713611115
80.
WrightM.LiY. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21470.
81.
WrightM. F. (2013). The relationship between young adults’ beliefs about anonymity and subsequent cyber aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(12), 858-862. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0009
82.
WrightM. F. (2016). Cyber victimization on college campuses: Longitudinal associations with suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety. Criminal Justice Review, 41(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016816634785
83.
YoungR.MilesS.AlhabashS. (2018). Attacks by Anons: A content analysis of aggressive posts, victim responses, and bystander interventions on a social media site. Social Media + Society, 4(1), Article 762444. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118762444
84.
ZuckermanM.KolinE. A.PriceL.ZoobI. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(6), 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040995
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
