The Expanded–Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (E-LSRP) was developed by Christian and Sellbom to improve on the psychometric properties of scores on the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. The current study investigated the construct validity of scores on the E-LSRP in 393 male inmates. Results provided support for the reliability and construct validity of E-LSRP scores. Specifically, confirmatory factor analysis results demonstrated support for a three-factor model. Additionally, correlation and multiple regression results provided evidence supporting the convergent and discriminant validity of E-LSRP scores against scores on measures assessing psychopathy-related personality traits (e.g., antagonism, disinhibition) and symptoms of internalizing disorders, respectively. Overall, these findings extend those of previous research by establishing that E-LSRP scores demonstrate validity in assessing psychopathy in correctional settings and thus, may be a useful tool for the assessment of psychopathy in these settings.
ArbleE. P. (2008). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the hypersensitive narcissism scale: Implications for the distinction of covert and overt narcissism [Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI]. https://commons.emich.edu/theses/236/
2.
Ben-PorathY. S.TellegenA. (2008). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
3.
BrinkleyC. A.DiamondP. M.MagalettaP. R.HeigelC. P. (2008). Cross-validation of levenson's psychopathy scale in a sample of federal female inmates. Assessment, 15(4), 464-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191108319043
4.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 111-135). Sage.
7.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
8.
ChristianE.SellbomM. (2016). Development and validation of an expanded version of the Three-Factor Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068176
9.
CleckleyH. (1941). The mask of sanity. Mosby.
10.
CleckleyH. (1988). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Emily S. Cleckley.
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CookeD. J.MichieC. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171
13.
FewL. R.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2013). An examination of the factor structure of the elemental psychopathy assessment. Personality Disorders, 4(3), 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000016
HendinH. M.CheekJ. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray's Narcism Scale. Journal of research in personality, 31(4), 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2204
16.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
JohnsonR. E.RosenC. C.DjurdjevicE. (2011). Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 744. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021504
LeeK. Y.SellbomM. (2021). Further validation of the elemental psychopathy assessment–Short Form (EPA-SF) in a large university sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(3), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1779734
23.
LevensonM. R.KiehlK. A.FitzpatrickC. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.68.1.151
LynamD. R.GaughanE. T.MillerJ. D.MillerD. J.Mullins-SweattS.WidigerT. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021146
26.
LynamD. R.WhitesideS.JonesS. (1999). Self-reported psychopathy: A validation study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73(1), 110-132. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA730108
27.
Maheux-CaronV.GamacheD.SellbomM.ChristianE.LussierY.SavardC. (2018). French adaptation and validation of the expanded version of the three-factor Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Assessment, 27(7), 1448-1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118811607
28.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
29.
MillerJ. D.GentileB.WilsonL.CampbellW. K. (2013). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality trait model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(3), 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.685907
30.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2015) Mplus user's guide. Muthén & Muthén.
31.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide: Statistical Analysis with latent variables. Muthén & Muthén.
32.
PatrickC. J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition (Unpublished test manual, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL).
33.
PatrickC. J.FowlesD. C.KruegerR. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016a). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
36.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
37.
RosenthalS. A.HooleyJ. M.SteshenkoY. (2007). Distinguishing grandiosity from self-esteem: Development of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale. Manuscript in preparation.
38.
RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio. http://www.rstudio.com/
39.
SalekinR. T.ChenD. R.SellbomM.LesterW. S.MacDougallE. (2014). Examining the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale: Is the two-factor model the best fitting model?Personality Disorders, 5(3), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000073
40.
SellbomM. (2011). Elaborating on the construct validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in incarcerated and non-incarcerated samples. Law and Human Behavior, 35(6), 440-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9249-x
41.
SellbomM.Ben-PorathY. S.PatrickC. J.WygantD. B.GartlandD. M.StaffordK. P. (2012). Development and construct validation of MMPI-2-RF indices of global psychopathy, fearless-dominance, and impulsive-antisocial. Personality Disorders, 3(1), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023888
42.
SellbomM.CookeD. J.ShouY. (2019). Development and initial validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality–Self-Report (CAPP-SR). Psycho-logical assessment, 31(7), 878-894. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000714
43.
SellbomM.LilienfeldS.FowlerK.McCraryK. (2018). The self-report assessment of psychopathy, challenges, pitfalls, and promises. In PatrickC. (Ed), The handbook of psychopathy (pp. 211-258). The Guilford Press.
44.
SellbomM.VeronaE. (2004). Differential neuropsychological mechanisms for two psychopathy factors. Poster presented at the 19th annual meeting for the Society for Research in Psychopathology, St. Louis, MO.
45.
ShouY.SellbomM.HanJ. (2017). Evaluating the construct validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in China. Assessment, 24(8), 1008-1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116637421
46.
SkeemJ. L.PolaschekD. L.PatrickC. J.LilienfeldS. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611426706
47.
SleepC. E.WeissB.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2019). An examination of the Triarchic Model of psychopathy's nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 71(July), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.005
48.
SmithS. F.LilienfeldS. O. (2013). Psychopathy in the workplace: The knowns and unknowns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.007
49.
SommaA.FossatiA.PatrickC.MaffeiC.BorroniS. (2014). The three-factor structure of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale: Fool's gold or true gold? A study in a sample of Italian adult non-clinical participants. Personality and Mental Health, 8(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1267
50.
Stasik-O’BrienS. M.BrockR. L.ChmielewskiM.Naragon-GaineyK.KoffelE.McDade-MontezE.O’HaraM. W.WatsonD. (2018). Clinical utility of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS). Assessment, 26(5), 944-960. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118790036
51.
WallT. D.SellbomM.GoodwinB. E. (2013). Examination of intelligence as a compensatory factor in non-criminal psychopathy in a non-incarcerated sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35(4), 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9358-1
52.
WatsonD.O’HaraM. W.Naragon-GaineyK.KoffelE.ChmielewskiM.KotovR.StasikS. M.RuggeroC. J. (2012). Development and validation of new anxiety and bipolar symptom scales for an expanded version of the IDAS (the IDAS-II). Assessment, 19(4), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112449857
53.
WatsonD.O’HaraM. W.Naragon-GaineyK.KoffelE.ChmielewskiM.KotovR.StasikS. M.RuggeroC. J. (2012). Development and validation of new anxiety and bipolar symptom scales for an expanded version of the IDAS (the IDAS-II). Assessment, 19, 399-420.
54.
WatsonD.O’HaraM. W.SimmsL. J.KotovR.ChmielewskiM.McDade-MontezE. A.GamezW.StuartS. (2007). Development and validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS). Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.253
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
