Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Scale Scores With Well-Established Psychopathology and Academic Achievement Measures in Adolescents With ADHD
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2022
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Scale Scores With Well-Established Psychopathology and Academic Achievement Measures in Adolescents With ADHD
The convergent and discriminant validity of the parent version of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) symptom and impairment scale scores were evaluated with the scale scores from multiple methods including a semistructured diagnostic interview, rating scales, and an academic achievement test. Participants were 82 adolescents (70% male, 78% non-Hispanic White) aged 13 to 17 years (M = 15.01) diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (77% predominantly inattentive presentation) and parents. CABI scale scores showed moderate (rs = .42 to .49) to substantial (rs = .62 to .91) convergent correlations with scores from similar measures. CABI scale scores also showed significant discriminant validity (convergent correlation significantly larger than discriminant correlation) with the scores on the other measures. These findings provide additional support for use of the CABI in research and clinical practice, and copies of the scale and norms are freely available.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
2.
BaşayO.ÇiftçiE.BeckerS. P.BurnsG. L. (2021). Validity of sluggish cognitive tempo in Turkish children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01110-5
3.
BeckerS. P. (2021). Systematic review: Assessment of sluggish cognitive tempo over the past decade. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.10.016
4.
BeckerS. P.BurnsG. L.SchmittA. P.EpsteinJ. N.TammL. (2019). Toward establishing a standard symptom set for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo in children: Evidence from teacher ratings in a community sample. Assessment, 26(6), 1128-1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117715732
5.
BeckerS. P.EpsteinJ. N.TammL.TilfordA. A.TischnerC. M.IsaacsonP. A.SimonJ. O.BeebeD. W. (2019). Shortened sleep duration causes sleepiness, inattention, and oppositionality in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Findings from a crossover sleep restriction/extension study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(4), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAC.2018.09.439
6.
BeckerS. P.FoglemanN. D. (2020). Psychiatric co-occurrence (comorbidity) in adolescents with ADHD. In BeckerS. P. (Ed.), ADHD in adolescents: Development, assessment, and treatment (pp. 170-203). Guilford Press.
7.
BeckerS. P.MossingK. W.ZoromskiA. K.VaughnA. J.EpsteinJ. N.TammL.BurnsG. L. (2020). Assessing sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in elementary students: Empirical differentiation, invariance across sex and grade, and measurement precision. Psychological Assessment, 32(11), 1047-1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000946
8.
BurnsG. L.BeckerS. P. (2019). Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD in nationally representative U.S. children: Empirical and clinical differentiation using categorical and dimensional approaches. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2019.1678165
9.
BurnsG. L.BeckerS. P.ServeraM.BernadM. M.García-BandaG. (2017). Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in the home and school contexts: Parent and teacher invariance and cross-setting validity. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000325
10.
BurnsG. L.GeiserC.ServeraM.BeckerS. P.BeauchaineT. P. (2020). Application of the bifactor S − 1 model to multisource ratings of ADHD/ODD symptoms: An appropriate bifactor model for symptom ratings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(7), 881-894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00608-4
11.
BurnsG. L.PreszlerJ.BeckerS. P. (2020). Psychometric and normative information on the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory in a nationally representative sample of United States children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1852943
12.
BurnsG. L.ServeraM.BeckerS. P. (2021). Psychometric properties and initial normative information on the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory with mother, father, and teacher ratings of Spanish Children. Psicothema, 33(1), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.267
13.
CoxeS.SibleyM. H.BeckerS. P. (2020). Presenting problem profiles for adolescents with ADHD: Differences by sex, age, race, and family adversity. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12441
14.
EbesutaniC.BernsteinA.NakamuraB. J.ChorpitaB. F.Higa-McMillanC. K.WeiszJ. R., & The Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2010). Concurrent validity of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-oriented scales: Correspondence with DSM diagnoses and comparison to syndrome scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(3), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9174-9
15.
JungS.LeeS.BurnsG. L.BeckerS. P. (2020). Internal and external validity of self-report and parent-report measures of sluggish cognitive tempo in South Korean adolescents. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09821-8
16.
KaufmanA.KaufmanN. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT-2). Pearson Assessment.
17.
KaufmanJ.BirmaherB.BrentD.RaoU.FlynnC.MoreciP.WilliamsonD.RyanN. (1997). Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(7), 980-988. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021
18.
KochT.EidM.LochnerK. (2018). The psychometric foundation of the CFA-MTMM models. In IrvingP.T.BoothD. JHughes. (Eds.), Psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 781-845). Wiley Blackwell.
19.
LitsonK.GeiserC.BurnsG. L.ServeraM. (2018). Trait and state variance in multi-informant assessments of ADHD and academic impairment in Spanish first-grade children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(5), 699-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1118693
20.
NakamuraB. J.EbesutaniC.BernsteinA.ChorpitaB. F. (2009). A psychometric analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-Oriented Scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31(3), 178-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-008-9119-8
21.
Navarro-SoriaI.ServeraM.BurnsG. (2020). Association of foster care and its duration with clinical symptoms and impairment: Foster care versus non-foster care comparisons with Spanish children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(2), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01596-1
22.
PowerT. J.DombrowskiS. C.WatkinsM. W.MautoneJ. A.EagleJ. W. (2007). Assessing children’s homework performance: Development of multi-dimensional, multi-informant rating scales. Journal of School Psychology, 45(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.002
23.
PreszlerJ.BurnsG. L.LitsonK.GeiserC.ServeraM. (2017). Trait and state variance in oppositional defiant disorder symptoms: A multi-source investigation with Spanish children. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000313
24.
PreszlerJ.BurnsG. L.LitsonK.GeiserC.ServeraM.BeckerS. P. (2019). How consistent is sluggish cognitive tempo across occasions, sources, and settings? Evidence from latent state–trait modeling. Assessment, 26(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116686178
25.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometrics. Routledge.
26.
SáezB.ServeraM.BeckerS. P.BurnsG. L. (2019). Optimal items for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo in children across mother, father, and teacher ratings. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48(6), 825-839. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1416619
27.
SeijasR.ServeraM.Garcia-BandaG.BurnsG. L.PreszlerJ.BarryC.LitsonK.GeiserC. (2019). Consistency of limited prosocial emotions across occasions, sources, and settings: Trait- or state-like construct in a young community sample?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0415-9
28.
ServeraM.SáezB.BurnsG. L.BeckerS. P. (2018). Clinical differentiation of sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(8), 818-829. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000375
WolraichM. L.LambertW.DoffingM. A.BickmanL.SimmonsT.WorleyK. (2003). Psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent rating scale in a referred population. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28(8), 559-567. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsg046
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
