Research on the validity of the behavioral inhibition system/behavioral approach system (BIS/BAS) scales focused on adolescent, student and adult populations. This study is the first to examine the psychometric properties of the BIS/BAS scales in a community (n = 368) and a clinical sample (n = 160) of older adults. Exploratory structural equation modelling with target rotation to the Carver and White model supported the construct validity of the BIS/BAS scales. Internal consistencies of the scales were generally satisfactory. Female participants scored higher on BIS and BAS-Reward Responsiveness compared with males. The community-dwelling sample scored higher on BAS-Drive and BAS-Reward Responsiveness compared with the clinical sample. Concerning the nomological net, BIS was positively related to Anxiety, Depression, maladaptive coping strategies, Neuroticism and Cluster C personality disorders. BAS was positively related to Openness, Extraversion, Active Confronting and Cluster B personality disorders and negatively related to the schizoid personality disorder. The BIS/BAS Scales are a useful instrument for measuring Gray’s theory of personality in older adults.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Author.
2.
ArrindellW. A.EttemaJ. H. M. (2003). Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). Swets Test Publishers.
3.
ArrindellW.EttemaJ. H. M.GroenmanN.BrookF.JanssenI.SlaetsJ.ter HeksG.DerksenJ.van der EndeJ.LandH.HofmanK.DostS. (2003). De groeiende inbedding van de Nederlandse SCL-90-R*: Psychodiagnostisch gereedschap [Further Dutch experiences with the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised]. Psycholoog, 38(11), 576-582.
BeckI.SmitsD. J. M.ClaesL.VandereyckenW.BijttebierP. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioural inhibition/behavioural activation system scale and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 407-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.007
6.
BijttebierP.BeckI.ClaesL.VandereyckenW. (2009). Gray’s Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(5), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.04.002
CarstensenL. L.FungH. H.CharlesS. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230
9.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
10.
ClaesL.VertommenS.SmitsD.BijttebierP. (2009). Emotional reactivity and self-regulation in relation to personality disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 948-953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.027
11.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(9), 1412-1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
CorrP. J. (2001). Testing problems in J. A. Gray’s personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30(2), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00028-3
14.
CorrP. J. (2009). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. In CorrP. J.MatthewsG. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology Part IV: Biological perspectives (1st ed., pp. 347-376). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596544.024
15.
CorrP. J. (2016). Reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 89(January), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.045
16.
DebastI.Van AlphenS. P. J.RossiG.TummersJ. H. A.BolwerkN.DerksenJ. J. L.RosowskyE. (2014). Personality traits and personality disorders in late middle and old age: Do they remain stable? A literature review. Clinical Gerontologist, 37(3), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2014.885917
17.
DenissenJ. J. A.GeenenR.van AkenM. A. G.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). Development and validation of a Dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701845229
18.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.BarrettP. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
19.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
20.
FrankenI. H. A. (2002). Behavioral Approach System (BAS) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00030-7
21.
FrankenI. H. A.MurisP.RassinE. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Dutch BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-3262-2
22.
GableL.ReisT. J.ElliotJ. A. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1135-1149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1135
23.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
GrayJ. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 182-205). Springer-Verlag.
26.
GrayJ. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.
27.
GrayJ. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In StrelauJ.AngleitnerA. (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement. Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 105-128). Plenum Press.
28.
GrayJ. A.McNaughtonN. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
HaskingP. A. (2006). Reinforcement sensitivity, coping, disordered eating and drinking behaviour in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(4), 677-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.017
31.
HeubeckB. G.WilkinsonR. B.CologonJ. (1998). A second look at Carver and White’s (1994) BIS/BAS Scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 785-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00124-X
32.
HeymN.FergusonE.LawrenceC. (2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray’s revised RST and Eysenck’s PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White’s BIS/BAS Scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 709-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013
33.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
34.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). Guilford Press.
35.
JormA. F. (1987). Sex differences in neuroticism: A quantitative synthesis of published research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 21(4), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048678709158917
36.
JormA. F.ChristensenH.HendersonA. S.JacombP. A.KortenA. E.RodgersB. (1999). Using the BIS/BAS Scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00143-3
37.
KokR. M.VerheyF. R. J. (2002). Gestandaardiseerde versie van de Mini-Mental State Examination [Standardized version of the Mini-Mental State Examination]. GGZ.
38.
LampeI. K.KahnR. S.HeerenT. J. (2001). Apathy, anhedonia and psychomotor retardation in elderly psychiatric patients and healthy elderly individuals. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 14(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/089198870101400104
39.
LeoneL.PeruginiM.BagozziR. P.PierroA.MannettiL. (2001). Construct validity and generalizability of the Carver-White behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system scales. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.415
40.
MacmillanN. A.CreelmanC. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge University Press.
41.
MarshH. W.MorinA. J. S.ParkerP. D.KaurG. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
42.
McFarlandS.HornsbyW. (2016). An analysis of five measures of global human identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 806-817. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2161
PastorM. C.RossS. R.SegarraP.MontañésS.PoyR.MoltóJ. (2007). Behavioral inhibition and activation dimensions: Relationship to MMPI-2 indices of personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(2), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.015
46.
PoythressN. G.SkeemJ. L.WeirJ.LilienfeldS. O.DouglasK. S.EdensJ. F.KennealyP. J. (2008). Psychometric properties of Carver and White’s (1994) BIS/BAS Scales in a large sample of offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 732-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021
47.
RossS. R.MillisS. R.BonebrightT. L.BailleyS. E. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(6), 861-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00196-9
48.
SantensE.ClaesL.DierckxE.DomG. (2020). Effortful control: A transdiagnostic dimension underlying internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. Neuropsychobiology, 79, 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506134
49.
SantensE.ClaesL.DierckxE.LuyckxK.PeuskensH.DomG. (2018). Personality profiles in substance use disorders: Do they differ in clinical symptomatology, personality disorders and coping?Personality and Individual Differences, 131(September), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.018
50.
ScheursP. J. G.van de WilligeG.BrosschotJ. F.TellegenB.GrausG. M. H. (1993). Handleiding Utrechtse Coping Lijst UCL (herziene versie) [Instruction manual Utrechtse Coping List (revised version)]. Swets & Zeitlinger.
51.
SchotteC. K. W.De DonckerD. A. M. (1998). Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders: Measurement of traits and distress characteristics: The ADP-IV. Psychological Medicine, 28(5), 1179-1188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798007041
52.
SmillieL. D.DalgleishL. I.JacksonC. J. (2007). Distinguishing between learning and motivation in behavioral tests of the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 476-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296951
53.
SmillieL. D.PickeringA. D.JacksonC. J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 320-335. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3
54.
SmitsD.De BoeckP. (2006). From BIS/BAS to the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 20(4), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.583
55.
SmitsD.KuppensP. (2005). The relation between anger, coping with anger and aggression, and the BIS/BAS system. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(4), 783-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.023
56.
SunJ.LuoY.ChangH.ZhangR.LiuR.JiangY.XiH. (2020). The mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in BIS/BAS sensitivities, depression, and anxiety among community-dwelling older adults in China. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13(November), 939-948. http://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S269874
57.
UllmanJ. B.BentlerP. M. (2009). Structural equation modelling. In HardyM.BrymmanA. (Eds.), The handbook of data analysis (pp. 431-458). Sage.
58.
WindsorT. D.PearsonE. L.ButterworthP. (2012). Age group differences and longitudinal changes in approach-avoidance sensitivity: Findings from an 8-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 545-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.002
59.
YuC. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California, Los Angeles, CA. http://www.statmodel.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf
60.
ZissersonR. N.PalfaiT. P. (2007). Behavioral Activation System (BAS) sensitivity and reactivity to alcohol cues among hazardous drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 32(10), 2178-2186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.02.016
