Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-6
Toward a Differentiated Assessment of Narcissism in Forensic Contexts: Validating the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire–Short Scale (NARQ-S) in a Forensic Sample
Grandiose narcissism is a multidimensional construct consisting of agentic and antagonistic aspects with markedly distinct correlates and consequences. However, this complexity has not been reflected in how grandiose narcissism is measured and investigated in forensic contexts. To provide a more nuanced picture of narcissism in a forensic context, we harnessed the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept. More precisely, we investigated the psychometric properties of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire–Short Scale (NARQ-S) in self- and informant reports of 199 male prisoners. Results confirmed the two-dimensional structure, acceptable internal consistency, moderate self-other agreement, and a differentiated nomological network for the NARQ-S. Admiration and rivalry showed distinct associations with criminal history, institutional misbehaviors, and social status in the group of prisoners. Together, the findings provide initial evidence for the validity and utility of self- and informant reports of the NARQ-S in forensic contexts and its contribution to security and treatment recommendations.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM.WygantD. B.SalekinR. T.KruegerR. F. (2014). Examining the associations between DSM-5 section III antisocial personality disorder traits and psychopathy in community and university samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(5), 675-697. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_134
3.
AndersonS. A.HawesD. J.SnowP. C. (2016). Language impairments among youth offenders: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 65(June), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.004
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
5.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
6.
BackM. D. (2018). The Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept. In HermannA. D.BrunellA.FosterJ. (Eds.), The handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 57-67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92171-6_6
7.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013-1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
8.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.LeckeltM. (2018). Early impressions of grandiose narcissists: A dual-pathway perspective. In HermannA. D.BrunellA. B.FosterJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 309-316). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92171-6_33
9.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016229
10.
BackM. D.VazireS. (2012). Knowing our personality. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 131-156). Guilford Press.
11.
BackM. D.VazireS. (2015). The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1998
12.
BalsisS.CooperL. D.OltmannsT. F. (2015). Are informant reports of personality more internally consistent than self-reports of personality?Assessment, 22(4), 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114556100
13.
BarryC. T.ChaplinW. F.GrafemanS. J. (2006). Aggression following performance feedback: The influences of narcissism, feedback valence, and comparative standard. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.008
14.
BarryC. T.FrickP. J.AdlerK. K.GrafemanS. J. (2007). The predictive utility of narcissism among children and adolescents: Evidence for a distinction between adaptive and maladaptive narcissism. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 508-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9102-5
15.
BarryC. T.GrafemanS. J.AdlerK. K.PickardJ. D. (2007). The relations among narcissism, self-esteem, and delinquency in a sample of at-risk adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 30(6), 933-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.12.003
16.
BaumeisterR. F.CataneseK. R.WallaceH. M. (2002). Conquest by force: A narcissistic reactance theory of rape and sexual coercion. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 92-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.1.92
17.
BeerA.WatsonD. (2008). Asymmetry in judgments of personality: Others are less differentiated than the self. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 535-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x
18.
BlickleG.SchlegelA.FassbenderP.KleinU. (2006). Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(2), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00226.x
19.
BosinskiH. A. G. (1997). Sexueller Kindesmißbrauch: Opfer, Täter und Sanktionen [Child sexual abuse: Victims, perpetrators and sanctions]. Sexuologie, 2(4), 67-88. http://www.sexualmedizin-kiel.org/ANL16.pdf
20.
BrownR. P.BudzekK.TamborskiM. (2009). On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(7), 951-964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209335461
21.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.219
BushmanB. J.BonacciA. M.Van DijkM.BaumeisterR. F. (2003). Narcissism, sexual refusal, and aggression: Testing a narcissistic reactance model of sexual coercion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1027-1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1027
24.
CainN. M.PincusA. L.AnsellE. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 638-656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.006
25.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.FurrR. M. (2011). Meta-insight: Do people really know how others see them?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 831-846. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024297
26.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.OltmannsT. F. (2011). You probably think this paper’s about you: Narcissists’ perceptions of their personality and reputation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023781
CaspiA.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A.Stouthamer-LoeberM.KruegerR. F.SchmutteP. S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32(2), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01151.x
29.
ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092-1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212
30.
DahleK.-P.HarwardtF.Schneider-NjepelV. (2012). Inventar zur Einschätzung des Rückfallrisikos und des Betreuungs-und Behandlungsbedarfs von Straftätern: LSI-R; deutsche Version des Level of Service Inventory-Revised nach Don Andrews und James Bonta [Inventory for assessing the risk of recidivism and the care and treatment needs of offenders: LSI-R; German version of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised by Don Andrews and James Bonta]. Hogrefe.
31.
DunnO. J.ClarkV. (1969). Correlation coefficients measured on the same individuals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(325), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2283746
32.
EdensJ. F.DeMatteoD.KelleyS. E.ArnoldS. (2018). Personality assessment in forensic psychology. In Zeigler-HillV.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences (pp. 548-572). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451163.n26
33.
FloraD. B.CurranP. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
34.
ForgasJ. P.LahamS. (2009). Halo effects. In BaumeisterR.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 499-502). Sage.
35.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
36.
GannonT. A. (2009). Social cognition in violent and sexual offending: An overview. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(2-3), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802190822
GeukesK.NestlerS.HuttemanR.DufnerM.KüfnerA. C.EgloffB.DenissenJ. J.BackM. D. (2017). Puffed-up but shaky selves: State self-esteem level and variability in narcissists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 769-786. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000093
39.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102(November), 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
40.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
41.
HausamJ.LehmannR. J. B.DahleK.-P. (2018). Predicting offenders’ institutional misconduct and recidivism: The utility of behavioral ratings by prison officers. Frontiers in Psychiatry, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00679
42.
HeilbrunK. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. Kluwer.
43.
HepperE. G.HartC. M.MeekR.CisekS.SedikidesC. (2014). Narcissism and empathy in young offenders and non-offenders. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1939
44.
HolsingerA.LowenkampC.LatessaE. (2006). Predicting institutional misconduct using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(2), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885895
45.
HosserD.LauterbachO.CamehnK. (2008). Validität und Reliabilität des FPI-R beim Einsatz im Strafvollzug [Validity and reliability of the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI-R) when used in the German penal system]. Diagnostica, 54(3), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.3.129
46.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
47.
IlleR.LahousenT.RousF.HofmannP.KapfhammerH. P. (2005). Persönlichkeitsprofile und psychische Abweichungen bei psychiatrisch-forensisch begutachteten Straftätern [Personality profile and psychic deviations in offenders examined for psychiatric-forensic appraisal]. Der Nervenarzt, 76(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-004-1761-0
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
50.
KavanaghL.RoweD.HerschJ.BarnettK. J.ReznikR. (2010). Neurocognitive deficits and psychiatric disorders in a NSW prison population. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.10.004
51.
KreagerD. A.YoungJ. T.HaynieD. L.BouchardM.SchaeferD. R.ZajacG. (2017). Where “old heads” prevail: Inmate hierarchy in a men’s prison unit. American Sociological Review, 82(4), 685-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417710462
52.
KrizanZ.HerlacheA. D. (2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018
53.
KronerD. G.MillsJ. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 471-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385480102800405
54.
KronerD. G.WeekesJ. R. (1996). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity with an offender sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00079-7
55.
KrusemarkE. A.CampbellW. K.CroweM. L.MillerJ. D. (2018). Comparing self-report measures of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and narcissistic personality disorder in a male offender sample. Psychological Assessment, 30(7), 984-990. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000579
LambeS.Hamilton-GiachritsisC.GarnerE.WalkerJ. (2018). The role of narcissism in aggression and violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650190
58.
LauK. S. L.MarseeM. A. (2013). Exploring narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism in youth: Examination of associations with antisocial behavior and aggression. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(3), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9586-0
59.
LauK. S. L.MarseeM. A.KunimatsuM. M.FassnachtG. M. (2010). Examining associations between narcissism, behavior problems, and anxiety in non-referred adolescents. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9135-1
60.
LaVigneM.Van RybroekG. J. (2010). Breakdown in the language zone: The prevalence of language impairments among juvenile and adult offenders and why it matters. US Davis Journal of Juvenile Law and Policy, Article 1127. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1663805
61.
LeckeltM.KüfnerA. C. P.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 856-871. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000057
62.
LeckeltM.WetzelE.GerlachT. M.AckermanR. A.MillerJ. D.ChopikW. J.PenkeL.GeukesK.KüfnerA. C.HuttemanR.RichterD.RennerK.-H.AllroggenM.BrecheenC.CampbellW. K.GrossmannI.BackM. D. (2018). Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire–Short Scale (NARQ-S) in convenience and representative samples. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000433
63.
LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (2014). Age-crime curve. In BruinsmaG.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 12-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_474
64.
MaplesJ. L.CarterN. T.FewL. R.CregoC.GoreW. L.SamuelD. B.WilliamsonR. L.LynamD. R.WidigerT. A.MarkonK. E., E., K.KruegerR. F.MillerJ. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1195-1210. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120
65.
MarkonK. E.QuiltyL. C.BagbyR. M.KruegerR. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20(3), 370-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486513
66.
MartinezM. A.ZeichnerA.ReidyD. E.MillerJ. D. (2008). Narcissism and displaced aggression: Effects of positive, negative, and delayed feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.012
67.
McCraeR. R. (2018). Method biases in single-source personality assessments. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1160-1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000566
68.
MillerJ. D.CampbellW. K. (2010). The case for using research on trait narcissism as a building block for understanding narcissistic personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1(3), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018229
69.
MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.GaughanE. T.GentileB.MaplesJ.Keith CampbellW. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013-1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
70.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39(4), 765-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00940.x
MotaS.LeckeltM.GeukesK.NestlerS.HumbergS.Schröder-AbéM.SchmukleS. C.BackM. D. (2019). A comprehensive examination of narcissists’ self-perceived and actual socioemotional cognition ability. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.174
73.
MotaS.SchaberS.AllroggenM.BuhlmannU.BackM. D. (2019). Narcissistic Admiration und Rivalry im psychotherapeutischen Kontext: Struktur, nomologisches Netz und die Vorhersage psychopathologischer Symptomatik. [Narcissistic admiration and rivalry in the psychotherapeutic context: Structure, nomological net and prediction of psychopathological symptoms]. Psychotherapeut, 64(6), 436-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-019-00381-1
74.
NiemeyerL. M.GroszM. P.ZimmermannJ.BackM. D. (2020). Assessing maladaptive personality in the forensic context: Development and validation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Forensic Faceted Brief Form (PID-5-FFBF) [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, University of Münster.
75.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2007). The self-report method. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). Guilford Press.
76.
PfäfflinF. (2009). Sexualstraftaten [Sexual offenses]. In VenzlaffU.BorkS. (Eds.), Psychiatrische Begutachtung: Ein praktisches Handbuch für Ärzte und Juristen (pp. 330-355). Elsevier.
77.
PincusA. L.AnsellE. B.PimentelC. A.CainN. M.WrightA. G.LevyK. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016530
RhodewaltF.MorfC. C. (1995). Self and interpersonal correlates of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A review and new findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1995.1001
80.
RogozaR.KowalskiC. M.SchermerJ. A. (2019). Dark Triad traits within the framework of the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Model. Journal of Individual Differences, 40(3), 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000289
81.
RogozaR.Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.RogozaM.PiotrowskiJ.WyszyńskaP. (2016). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry in the context of personality metatraits. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.003
82.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
83.
ScheurerH.RichterP. (2005). Psychologische Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik: Zur Bedeutung von Persönlichkeitsfragebogen bei der Begutachtung der Schuldfähigkeit [Psychological personality diagnostics: On the importance of personality questionnaires in the assessment of criminal liability]. In KröberK.-L.StellerM. (Eds.), Psychologische Begutachtung im Strafverfahren (pp. 39-53). Steinkopff.
84.
SchoenleberM.SadehN.VeronaE. (2011). Parallel syndromes: Two dimensions of narcissism and the facets of psychopathic personality in criminally involved individuals. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021870
SchuppJ.GerlitzJ. Y. (2008). Big Five Inventory-SOEP (BFI-S). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS) [Compilation of social science items and scales]. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis54
87.
SchwindH.-D.BöhmA.JehleJ.-M.LaubenthalK. (2009). Strafvollzugsgesetze: Bund und Länder. Kommentar [Prison laws: Federal and state. Comment]. De Gruyter Recht.
SteinerH.CauffmanE.DuxburyE. (1999). Personality traits in juvenile delinquents: Relation to criminal behavior and recidivism. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(3), 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199903000-00011
90.
VazireS. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.003
91.
VazireS.CarlsonE. N. (2011). Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402478
92.
VazireS.MehlM. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1202-1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013314
93.
von CollaniG.HerzbergP. Y. (2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg [A revised version of the German adaptation of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1024//0170-1789.24.1.3
94.
WehnerC.MaaßU.LeckeltM.BackM. D.ZieglerM. (2020). Validation of the Short Dark Triad in a German sample: Structure, nomological network, and an ultrashort version. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000617
95.
WhiteJ. L.MoffittT. E.CaspiA.BartuschD. J.NeedlesD. J.Stouthamer-LoeberM. (1994). Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(2), 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.103.2.192
WrightB. R. E.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A. (2001). The effects of social ties on crime vary by criminal propensity: A life-course model of interdependence. Criminology, 39(2), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00925.x
98.
Zeigler-HillV.VrabelJ. K.McCabeG. A.CosbyC. A.TraederC. K.HobbsK. A.SouthardA. C. (2019). Narcissism and the pursuit of status. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12392
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
