The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) is one of the most widely used measure of posttraumatic cognitions. The original factor analysis of the PTCI provided evidence for a three-factor model of negative cognitions about self, world, and self-blame. However, subsequent research has failed to replicate this factor structure without removing multiple items. Given these inconsistent findings, we examined the PTCI factor structure in a sample of trauma-exposed undergraduates (n = 868). First, we conducted a series of four confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) based on previously published models of the PTCI and a modified model based on previously removed items, all which indicated poor fit. Next, we conducted a CFA of the recently published three-factor PTCI-9, which approached adequate fit. We then replicated the CFA of the PTCI-9 in a second independent sample (n = 971), finding a similar pattern of near adequate fit. These findings highlight the need to revise the PTCI. In addition, results indicate the promising nature of the PTCI-9 as an alternative measure of posttraumatic cognitions.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
2.
BeckJ. G.CoffeyS. F.PalyoS. A.GudmundsdottirB.MillerL. M.ColderC. R. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): A replication with motor vehicle accident survivors. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.289
3.
BernatJ. A.RonfeldtH. M.CalhounK. S.AriasI. (1998). Prevalence of traumatic events and peritraumatic predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms in a nonclinical sample of college students. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11(4), 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024485130934
4.
BlevinsC. A.WeathersF. W.DavisM. T.WitteT. K.DominoJ. L. (2015). The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(6), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22059
5.
BrewinC. R.DalgleishT.JosephS. (1996). A dual representation theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review, 103(4), 670-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.670
CromerL. D.SmythJ. M. (2010). Making meaning of trauma: Trauma exposure doesn’t tell the whole story. Journal Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(2), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-009-9130-8
10.
CurranP. J.WestS. G.FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
11.
Daie GabaiA.AderkaI. M.Allon-SchindelI.FoaE. B.Gilboa-SchectmanE. (2011). Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): Psychometric properties and gender differences in an Israeli sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(2), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.09.012
12.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
13.
FoaE. B.EhlersA.ClarkD. M.TolinD. F.OrsilloS. M. (1999). The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.303
14.
GrayM. J.LitzB. T.HsuJ. L.LombardoT. W. (2004). Psychometric properties of the life events checklist. Assessment, 11(4), 330-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104269954
15.
GulecM.KalafatT.BoysanM.BarutY. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) in a non-clinical sample. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 50(2), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.4274/npa.y6336
16.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
HylandP.MurphyJ.ShevlinM.MurphyS.EganA.BoduszekD. (2015). Psychometric properties of the posttraumatic cognition inventory within a Northern Ireland adolescent sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12089
18.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Fourth edition. Guilford Press.
19.
KucharskaJ. (2018). Validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9963-y
20.
McCannI. L.SakheimD. K.AbrahamsonD. J. (1988). Trauma and victimization: A model of psychological adaptation. The Counseling Psychologist, 16(4), 531-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000088164002
21.
MillerL. A.LovlerR. L. (2020). Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach (6th ed.). Sage.
22.
MullerJ.WessaM.RabeS.DorfelD.KnaevelsrudC.FlorH.MaerckerA.KarlA. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) in a German sample of individuals with a history of trauma. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018603
OwensG. P.ChardK. M. (2011). Cognitive distortions among women reporting childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(2), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016002006
25.
RuscioJ.RuscioA. M. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological assessment: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102091002
26.
RuscioJ.RuscioA. M. (2004). Clarifying boundary issues in psychopathology: The role of taxometrics in a comprehensive program of structural research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.24
27.
SextonM. B.DavisM. T.BennettD. C.MorrisD. H.RauchS. A. M. (2018). A psychometric evaluation of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory with veterans seeking treatment following military trauma exposure. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226, 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.048
28.
SilversteinM. W.WitteT. K.LeeD. J.KramerL. B.WeathersF. W. (2018). Dimensions of growth? Examining the distinctiveness of the five factors of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 31(3), 448-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22298
29.
SmithG. T.McCarthyD. M.AndersonK. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
30.
SuY. J.ChenS. H. (2008). The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory-Chinese revised: Validation and refinement with a traumatized college sample in Taiwan. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(7), 1110-1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.11.008
31.
van EmmerikA. A. P.SchoorlM.EmmelkampP. M. G.KamphuisJ. H. (2006). Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(7), 1053-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.07.002
WellsS. Y.MorlandL. A.TorresE. M.KloezemanK.MackintoshM.AaronsG. A. (2019). The development of a brief version of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI-9). Assessment, 26(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116685401
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
