The Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI) is a popular measure and the first to attempt to tap into both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism (GN/VN). However, data have raised questions as to whether it appropriately formulates GN and differentiates it from VN. In this study, we examined the Brief-PNI’s structure and construct validity, by using a novel model based on the theoretical notion of GN and VN sharing core features. Participants (N = 1,061) completed the Brief-PNI, and psychological distress and social avoidance questionnaires. Results showed a better fit and differentiation of GN and VN for a model with cross-loading of shared first-order factors on GN and VN, compared with the traditional PNI structure. We concluded that the Brief-PNI can offer an appropriate formulation and differentiation of VN and GN, provided that their shared variance is considered.
BeauducelA.HerzbergP. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
2.
CroweM. L.LoPilatoA. C.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2016). Identifying two groups of entitled individuals: Cluster analysis reveals emotional stability and self-esteem distinction. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(6), 762-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2015_29_229
3.
CronbachL.J.SchönemannP.McKieD. (1965). Alpha coefficient for stratified-parallel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 291-312.
4.
DickinsonK. A.PincusA. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146
5.
DowgwilloE. A.DawoodS.PincusA. L. (2016). The dark side of narcissism. In Zeigler-HillV.MarcusD. K. (Eds.), The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 25-44). American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14854-002
6.
EdershileE. A.SimmsL. J.WrightA. G. (2019). A multivariate analysis of the pathological Narcissism Inventory’s Nomological Network. Assessment, 26(4), 619-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118766412
7.
FirstM. B.GibbonM.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W.BenjaminL. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis-II personality disorders. American Psychiatric Press.
8.
FischerD. G.FickC. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(2), 417-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053002011
9.
FossatiA.BorroniS.GraziolyF.DornettiL.MarcassoliI.MaffetiC.CheekJ. (2009). Tracking the hypersensitive dimension in narcissism: Reliability and validity of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale. Personality and Mental Health, 3(4), 235-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmh.92
10.
FossatiA.SommaA.BorroniS.PincusA. L.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2017). Profiling pathological narcissism according to DSM-5 domains and traits: A study on consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients. Psychological Assessment, 29(11), 1400-1411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000348
11.
GloverN.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.CregoC.WidigerT. A. (2012). The five-factor narcissism inventory: A five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 500-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.670680
12.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
13.
JacksonD. N. (1984). Personality research form manual (3rd ed.). Research Psychologists Press.
14.
JakšićN.MilasG.IvezićE.WertagA.Jokić-BegićN.PincusA. L. (2014). The Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI) in transitional post-war Croatia: Psychometric and cultural considerations. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(4), 640-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9425-2
15.
KarakoulaP.TrilivaS.TsaousisI. (2013). Description of the basic psychometric characteristics and the factor structure of the Greek version of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychology, 20(2), 160-175.
KernbergO. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Aronson.
18.
KernbergO. F. (1992). Aggression in personality disorders and perversions. Yale University Press.
19.
KernbergO. F. (1998a). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical background and diagnostic classification. In RonningstamE. (Ed.), Disorders of narcissism: Diagnostic, clinical, and empirical implications (pp. 29-51). American Psychiatric Association.
20.
KernbergO. F. (1998b). The psychotherapeutic management of psychopathic, narcissistic and paranoid transference. In MillonT.SimonsenE.Birket-SmithM.DavisR. D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, violent and criminal behavior (pp. 372-392). Guilford Press.
LevyK. N. (2012). Subtypes, dimensions, levels, and mental states in narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(8), 886-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21893
23.
LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Psychology Foundation.
MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.GaughanE. T.GentileB.MaplesJ.CampbellW. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
26.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.CampbellW. K. (2016a). Measures of narcissism and their relations toDSM-5pathological traits: A critical reappraisal. Assessment, 23(1), 3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191114522909
27.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.CampbellW. K. (2016b). Rejoinder: A construct validity approach to the assessment of narcissism. Assessment, 23(1), 18-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191115608943
MillerJ. D.McCainJ.LynamD. R.FewL. R.GentileB.MacKillopJ.CampbellW. K. (2014). A comparison of the criterion validity of popular measures of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder via the use of expert ratings. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 958-969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036613
30.
MorfC. C. (2006). Personality reflected in a coherent idiosyncratic interplay of intra- and interpersonal self-regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1527-1556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00419.x
31.
MorfC. C.SchürchE.KüfnerA.SiegristP.VaterA.BackM.MestelR.Schrode-AbeM. (2017). Expanding the nomological net of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory: German validation and extension in a clinical inpatient sample. Assessment, 24(4), 419-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191115627010
32.
PincusA.L.AnsellE. B.PimentelC. A.CainN. M.WrightA. C. G.LevyK. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016530
33.
RaskinR. N.HallC. S. (1981). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Alternate from reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(2), 159-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4502_10
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. É.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
36.
RonningstamE. (2005a). Identifying and understanding narcissistic personality. Oxford University Press.
37.
RonningstamE. (2005b). Narcissistic personality disorder: A review. In MajM.AkiskalH. S.MezzichJ. E.OkashaA. (Eds.), Evidence and experience in psychiatry: Volume 8: Personality disorders (pp. 277-327). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470090383.ch4
38.
RonningstamE. (2011). Narcissistic personality disorder in DSM-V: In support of retaining a significant diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(2), 248-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.248
SchoenleberM.RocheM. J.WetzelE.PincusA. L.RobertsB. W. (2015). Development of a brief version of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1520-1526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000158
41.
ShiD.Maydeu-OlivaresA. (2019). The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(3), 421-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164
ThomasK. M.WrightA. G.LukowitskyM. R.DonnellanM. B.HopwoodC. J. (2012). Evidence for the criterion validity and clinical utility of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory, Assessment, 19(2), 135-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191112436664
44.
ThomasK. M.WrightA. G.LukowitskyM. R.DonnellanM. B.HopwoodC. J. (2016). Correction to “evidence for the criterion validity and clinical utility of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.”Assessment, 23(2), 262-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115584971
45.
TrittS. M.RyderA. G.RingA. J.PincusA. L. (2010). Pathological narcissism and depressive temperament. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122(3), 280-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.09.006
46.
WrightA. G. C. (2016). On the measure and mismeasure of narcissism: A response to “measures of narcissism and their relations to DSM-5 pathological traits: A critical reappraisal.”Assessment, 23(1), 10-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191115599054
47.
WrightA. G. C.LukowitskyM. R.PincusA. L.ConroyD. E. (2010). The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Assessment, 17(4), 467-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191110373227
48.
WrightA. G. C.PincusA. L.ThomasK. M.HopwoodC. J.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2013). Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Assessment, 20(3), 339-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486692
49.
YouJ.LeungF.LaiK. K. Y.FuK. (2013). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory among Chinese university students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(3), 309-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.718303
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
