Malingered attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may be strongly motivated on college campuses by recreational use of ADHD medications and to obtain unwarranted academic accommodations. Rather than rely on face-valid (easily faked) ADHD checklists, the study focused on the more complex Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth edition (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, 2008). However, the current literature has not yet investigated well-defined detection strategies for feigned WAIS-IV presentations. Using aprioristic standards, four different detection strategies from the feigning literature were adapted to certain WAIS-IV subscales. For example, significantly below-chance performance was applied to visual puzzles. Using a between-subjects simulation design, 74 undergraduate simulators were compared with archival data on 73 outpatients diagnosed with ADHD at a university psychology clinic. Very large effect sizes (Cohen’s ds from 1.66 to 1.90) differentiated between genuine and feigned ADHD. Two strategies (significantly below-chance performance and floor effect) showed strong promise if cross-validated for other feigning presentations. The study concluded with clinical considerations and future avenues for research.
AnfangS. A.GoldL. H.MeyerD. J. (2018). AAPL practice resource for the forensic evaluation of psychiatric disability. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 46(1), 102.
2.
BenderS. D.RogersR. (2004). Detection of neurocognitive feigning: Development of a multi-strategy assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00165-8
3.
Ben-PorathY. S.TellegenA. (2011). MMPI-2-RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
4.
BinderL. M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639308402555
5.
BookshL. R.PellaR. D.SinghA. N.GouvierD. W. (2010). Ability of college students to simulate ADHD on objective measures of attention. Journal of Attention Disorders, 13(4), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054708329927
6.
BooneK.LuP.HerzbergD. S. (2002). The b Test manual. Western Psychological Services.
DuPaulG. J.VolpeR. J. (2009). ADHD and learning disabilities: Research findings and clinical implications. Current Attention Disorders Reports, 1(4), 152-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12618-009-0021-4
9.
FooteW. E. (2016). Evaluations of individuals for disability in insurance and social security contexts. In JacksonR.RoeschR. (Eds.), Learning forensic assessment: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 413-433). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Garcia-WillinghamN. E.BoschC. M.WallsB. D.BerryD. T. R. (2018). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment using standard neuropsychological tests. In RogersR.BenderS. D. (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 329-358). Guilford Press.
12.
GreiffensteinM. F.BakerW. J.GolaT. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6(3), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218
13.
GudjonssonG. H.ShackletonH. (1986). The pattern of scores on Raven’s Matrices during “faking bad” and “non-faking” performance. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1986.tb00668.x
14.
JasinskiL. J.BerryD. T. R.ShanderaA. L.ClarkJ. A. (2011). Use of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Span subtest for malingering detection: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.516743
15.
KatzL. J.BrownF. C.RothR. M.BeersS. R. (2011). Processing speed and working memory performance in those with both ADHD and a reading disorder compared with those with ADHD alone. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(5), 425-433. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr026
MartinR. C.FranzenM. D.OreyS. (1998). Magnitude of error as a strategy to detect feigned memory impairment. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.12.1.84.1722
18.
MaxwellS. E.LauM. Y.HowardG. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean?American Psychologist, 70(6), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400
19.
MertenT.RogersR. (2017). An international perspective on feigned mental disabilities: Conceptual issues and continuing controversies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 35(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2274
MusickJ.OttoR. (2010). The Inventory of Legal Knowledge. Psychological Assessment Resources.
22.
NeathI.BrownG. D. (2006). SIMPLE: Further applications of a local distinctiveness model of memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 46, 201-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(06)46006-0
23.
RobinsonE. V.RogersR. (2018). Detection of feigned ADHD across two domains: The MMPI-2-RF and CAARS for faked symptoms and TOVA for simulated attention deficits. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40(3), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9640-8
24.
RogersR. (2008). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In RogersR. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 14-35, 3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
25.
RogersR. (2018). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In RogersR.BenderS. D. (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception, 4th ed. (pp. 18-41). Guilford Press.
26.
RogersR.BenderS. D. (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
27.
RogersR.CruiseK. R. (1998). Assessment of malingering with simulation designs: Threats to external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025702405865
28.
RogersR.GillardN. D. (2011). Research methods for the assessment of malingering. In RosenfeldB.PenrodS. D. (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 174-188). Wiley.
29.
RogersR.GranacherR. P.Jr. (2011). Conceptualization and assessment of malingering. In DroginE. Y.DattilioF. M.SadoffR. L.GutheilT. G. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic assessment: Psychological and psychiatric perspectives (pp. 659-678). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118093399.ch29
30.
RogersR.HarrellE. H.LiffC. D. (1993). Feigning neuropsychological impairment: A critical review of methodological and clinical considerations. Clinical Psychology Review, 13(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(93)90023-F
31.
RogersR.HenryS. A.SharfA. J.RobinsonE. V.WilliamsM. M. (2017). Dodging self-incriminations: An examination of feigned Miranda abilities on the SAMA. Assessment, 24(8), 975-986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116634206
32.
RogersR.RobinsonE. V.HenryS. A. (2017). Feigned adjudicative incompetence: Testing effectiveness of the ILK and SAMA with jail detainees. Assessment, 24(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115605613
33.
RogersR.SalekinR. T.SewellK. W.GoldsteinA.LeonardK. (1998). A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and Human Behavior, 22(4), 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025714808591
34.
RogersR.SewellK. W.CruiseK. R.WangE. W.UstadK. L. (1998). The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings. Assessment, 5(4), 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119800500409
35.
RogersR.SewellK. W.DroginE. Y.FiducciaC. E. (2012). Standardized Assessment of Miranda Abilities (SAMA) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
36.
RogersR.TillbrookC. E.SewellK. W. (2004). Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised (ECST-R). Psychological Assessment Resources.
37.
RogersR.VelsorS. F.WilliamsM. M. (in press). A brief commentary on SIRS versus SIRS-2 critiques. Psychological Injury and Law.
38.
RogersR.WilliamsM. M.WinninghamD. B.SharfA. J. (2018). An examination of PAI clinical descriptors and correlates in an outpatient sample: Tailoring of interpretive statements. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40(2), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9627-5
39.
SchroederR. W.Twumasi-AnkrahP.BaadeL. E.MarshallP. S. (2012). Reliable Digit Span: A systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment, 19(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111428764
40.
SharfA. J.RogersR. (2020). Validation of the MMPI-A-RF for youth with mental health needs: A systematic examination of clinical correlates and construct validity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 42(3), 527-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09754-x
41.
SharfA. J.RogersR.WilliamsM. M.HenryS. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(3), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9590-1
42.
SlickD.ShermanE.IversonG. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
43.
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. A. (2019). Digest of Education Statistics 2017. National Center for Education Statistics.
44.
SollmanM. J.BerryD. T. R. (2011). Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic update and extension. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(8), 774-789. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr066
45.
SollmanM. J.RanseenJ. D.BerryD. T. R. (2010). Detection of feigned ADHD in college students. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018857
46.
StevensA.FriedelE.MehrenG.MertenT. (2008). Malingering and uncooperativeness in psychiatric and psychological assessment: Prevalence and effects in a German sample of claimants. Psychiatry Research, 157(1-3), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.003
47.
TombaughT. N.TombaughP. W. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Multi-Health Systems.
48.
WallaceE. R.Garcia-WillinghamN. E.WallsB. D.BoschC. M.BalthropK. C.BerryD. T. R. (2019). A meta-analysis of malingering detection measures for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000659.supp
WogarM. A.van den BroekM. D.BradshawC. M.SzabadiE. (1998). A new performance-curve method for the detection of simulated cognitive impairment. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(3), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01389.x
51.
WoodsD. L.HerronT. J.YundE. W.HinkR. F.KishiyamaM. M.ReedB. (2011). Computerized analysis of error patterns in digit span recall. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(7), 721-734. doi:10.1080/13803395.2010.550602
52.
YoungG. (2014). Malingering, feigning, and response bias in psychiatric/psychological injury: Implications for practice and court. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7899-3
53.
YoungG. (2015). Malingering in forensic disability-related assessments: Prevalence 15 ± 15%. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(3), 188-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9232-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
